What Patient Characteristics Could Potentially Affect Patient Satisfaction Scores During Spine Clinic?

Spine ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (13) ◽  
pp. 1039-1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse E. Bible ◽  
Harrison F. Kay ◽  
David N. Shau ◽  
Kevin R. OʼNeill ◽  
P. Bradley Segebarth ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Damian Ryan ◽  
Jennifer Miller ◽  
Joanne Campbell

Abstract Objectives Comparison of the short peripheral cannula (SPC) complication rate of patients with cellulitis receiving IV cefazolin via an elastomeric infuser with those receiving twice-daily bolus treatment (control group) in the Hospital in the Home service. Methods A randomized controlled study using elastomeric infuser versus bolus delivery of IV cefazolin via an SPC of patients referred to the Hospital in the Home service in the Northern Illawarra for treatment of cellulitis. A total of 104 patients were enrolled during the time period of May 2018 to January 2019. Primary outcome measures were SPC complications including phlebitis with a secondary outcome of patient satisfaction. Results A total of 104 patients enrolled. After randomization there were 60 in the infuser group and 44 in the bolus group. Patient characteristics of age, gender, weight and mobility were similar for the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the endpoint of cannula complication rates. Patient satisfaction scores showed patient acceptance of both forms of treatment. Conclusions This study suggests that using elastomeric infusers to deliver cefazolin via a short peripheral IV catheter has similar complication rates to traditional bolus delivery. Patients surveyed showed high levels of satisfaction with both forms of antibiotic delivery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e000688
Author(s):  
Czer Anthoney Enriquez Lim ◽  
Julie Oh ◽  
Erick Eiting ◽  
Catherine Coughlin ◽  
Yvette Calderon ◽  
...  

BackgroundRecent trends towards more cost-efficient and patient-centred treatment are converging to provide opportunities to improve the care of children. Observation units are hospital areas dedicated to the ongoing evaluation and management of patients for a brief period of time for well-defined conditions. We describe the implementation of a paediatric observation unit (POU) adjacent to a paediatric emergency department (PED) in an urban, academic, community hospital.MethodsStaffing models were designed to provide paediatric services to patients in both the PED and POU. Admission criteria, workflow and transfer guidelines were developed. Quality improvement initiatives were undertaken and evaluated. Unit throughput, patient outcomes and patient satisfaction data were collected and analysed.ResultsOver a 2-year period, there were 24 038 patient visits to the PED. Of these, 1215 (5.1%) patients required admission. Seven hundred and seventy-seven (64.0%) of these children were admitted to the POU. One hundred and nineteen (15.3%) of these patients were subsequently converted to inpatient hospitalisation. The average length of stay (LOS) was 25.7 hours in 2017 and 26.5 hours in 2018. Ten patients returned to the PED within 72 hours of discharge from the POU and four were readmitted. Patient satisfaction scores regarding ‘likelihood to recommend’ improved from the 36th to the 92nd percentile rank over a 1-year period. Close monitoring of patient outcomes allowed for the adjustment of admission guidelines, increased unit census and optimised utilisation.ConclusionA combined PED-POU has been successful at our institution in meeting benchmark goals set for LOS and conversion rates. In addition, quality improvement interventions increased patient census and improved patient satisfaction scores while reducing the inpatient burden on the referring children’s hospital.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Corné van Loon ◽  
Niels Baas ◽  
Verdonna Huey ◽  
James Lesko ◽  
Geert Meermans ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The purpose of the study was to identify the earliest time point where subjects realized the greatest clinical improvement after TKA, and the time when post-operative scores became superior to pre-operative scores. Post-hoc exploratory analyses were conducted to investigate predictors of early post-operative outcomes and patient satisfaction. Methods Six investigators across 4 sites in the Netherlands prospectively implanted 200 subjects with a contemporary cemented rotating platform device. Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) KOOS-PS, PKIP, and EQ-5D were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively through 2-years. PROMs change from pre-operative baseline were summarized, along with radiographic outcomes and adverse events (AEs). Pre-operative patient characteristics were explored for correlation with patient outcomes, and patient satisfaction for correlation with KOOS-PS. Results Follow-up compliance was 99% at 6-months, and 95.5% at 2-years. The percentage with higher KOOS-PS compared to baseline was 81.3% at 6-months. KOOS-PS, PKIP, and PKIP subscore means were all better at 6-weeks versus baseline. Gender, BMI, hypertension, and pre-operative KOOS-PS were weakly correlated with 6-week KOOS-PS (multivariate R-squared = 14.1%), but only pre-operative KOOS-PS demonstrated correlation with post-operative KOOS-PS at 6-months or later (R-squared < 5% at 6-months and 2 years). Satisfaction was moderately correlated with concurrent KOOS-PS at each post-operative time point, with (R-squared = 35.3% at 6-months, and 37.5% at 2 years). Conclusion The greatest mean clinical improvement occurred within the first 6-weeks. Although some pre-operative factors were correlated with higher early post-operative KOOS-PS outcomes, these advantages disappeared by 6-months aside from weak correlation with pre-operative KOOS-PS. Post-operative KOOS-PS was moderately correlated with concurrent post-operative satisfaction. These results may be used for pre-operative counseling and management of patient’s postoperative expectations. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02339610. Registered 15 January 2015.


2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric W. Ford ◽  
Timothy R. Huerta ◽  
Mark L. Diana ◽  
Abby Swanson Kazley ◽  
Nir Menachemi

2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (7) ◽  
pp. 1253-1259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Otto S. Lin ◽  
Richard A. Kozarek ◽  
Andrew Arai ◽  
Michael Gluck ◽  
Geoffrey C. Jiranek ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 1285-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian E. Etier ◽  
Scott P. Orr ◽  
Jonathan Antonetti ◽  
Scott B. Thomas ◽  
Steven M. Theiss

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document