Perineal Proctectomy With Bio-Thiersch Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse With Fecal Incontinence

2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. e45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jed F. Calata ◽  
Ajit Pai ◽  
Slawomir Marecik ◽  
Leela M. Prasad ◽  
John J. Park
Keyword(s):  
Fecal Incontinence ◽  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Complete Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Thiersch Procedure

scholarly journals Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: experience and late results with 51 patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 168-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Walter Sobrado ◽  
Desidério Roberto Kiss ◽  
Sérgio C. Nahas ◽  
Sérgio E. A. Araújo ◽  
Victor E. Seid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Fecal Incontinence ◽  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Late Results ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Complete Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Presacral Space ◽  
Perineal Rectosigmoidectomy ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Low Incidence

The "best" surgical technique for the management of complete rectal prolapse remains unknown. Due to its low incidence, it is very difficult to achieve a representative number of cases, and there are no large prospective randomized trials to attest to the superiority of one operation over another. PURPOSE: Analyze the results of surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse during 1980 and 2002. METHOD: Retrospective study. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent surgical treatment during this period. The mean age was 56.7 years, with 39 females. Besides the prolapse itself, 33 patients complained of mucous discharge, 31 of fecal incontinence, 14 of constipation, 17 of rectal bleeding, and 3 of urinary incontinence. Abdominal operations were performed in 36 (71%) cases. Presacral rectopexy was the most common abdominal procedure (29 cases) followed by presacral rectopexy associated with sigmoidectomy (5 cases). The most common perineal procedure was perineal rectosigmoidectomy associated with levatorplasty (12 cases). Intraoperative bleeding from the presacral space developed in 2 cases, and a rectovaginal fistula occurred in another patient after a perineal rectosigmoidectomy. There were 2 recurrences after a mean follow-up of 49 months, which were treated by reoperation. CONCLUSION: Abdominal and perineal procedures can be used to manage complete rectal prolapse with safety and good long-term results. Age, associated medical conditions, and symptoms of fecal incontinence or constipation are the main features that one should bear in mind in order to choose the best surgical approach.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Suture versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children: A Comparative Randomized Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
AbdelAziz Yehya ◽  
Ibrahim Gamaan ◽  
Mohamed Abdelrazek ◽  
Mohamed Shahin ◽  
Ashraf Seddek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fecal Incontinence ◽  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Complete Rectal Prolapse ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Laparoscopic Suture ◽  
Suture Rectopexy ◽  
Group B ◽  
Mesh Rectopexy

Purpose. To compare laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Patients and Methods. The prospective study was conducted at Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt between Feb 2010 and Jan 2015. Seventy-eight children with persistent complete rectal prolapse were subjected to laparoscopic rectopexy. Fourteen parents refused to participate. All patients received initial conservative treatment for more than one year. The remaining 64 patients were randomized divided into two equal groups. Group A; 32 patients underwent laparoscopic mesh rectopexy and group B, 32 underwent laparoscopic suture rectopexy. The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group. Results. Sixty-four cases presented with persistent complete rectal prolapse were the material of this study. They were 40 males and 24 females. Mean age at operation was 8 (5–12) years. All cases were completed laparoscopically. Mean operative time in laparoscopic suture rectopexy was shorter than laparoscopic mesh rectopexy group. No early post-operative complications were encountered. No cases of recurrence with mesh rectopexy group while in suture rectopexy group it was 4 cases (14.2%). Post-operative constipation occurred in one case (3.57%) in suture rectopexy group and occurred in one case (3.3%) in mesh rectopexy group. Fecal incontinence improved in 26/28 cases (92.8%) in suture rectopexy while in mesh rectopexy it was improved in 30/30 cases (100%) of cases. Conclusion. Both laparoscopic mesh and suture rectopexy are feasible and reliable methods for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse in children. However, no recurrence, low incidence of constipation and high improvement of incontinence at follow up more than 36 months with mesh rectopexy accordingly, we considered mesh rectopexy to be the procedure of choice in treatment of complete rectal prolapse.

Simple Technique for Repair of Complete Rectal Prolapse Using a Circular Stapler With Thiersch Procedure

2002 ◽  
Vol 168 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ichiro Hayashi ◽  
Hideki Masuda ◽  
Shigeoki Hayashi ◽  
Tadatoshi Takayama ◽  
Hironobu Sato
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Simple Technique ◽  
Circular Stapler ◽  
Complete Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Thiersch Procedure

scholarly journals Outcome of Fecal Incontinence in Patients with Rectal Prolapse Undergoing the Altemeier Procedure with or without Posterior Levatorplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (01) ◽  
pp. 052-057
Author(s):  
Alimohammad Bananzadeh ◽  
Hamed Shariat Razavi ◽  
Shahin Khodaei ◽  
Maytham Hameed Al-Qanbar ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Kazem Tadayon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fecal Incontinence ◽  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Rectal Surgery ◽  
Complete Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
The Social ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
History Of ◽  
Altemeier Procedure ◽  
Baseline Values

Abstract Objective To compare the fecal incontinence status of patients submitted to theAltemeier procedure with or without posterior levatorplasty. Materials and Methods Medical records of the patients who underwent the Altemeier procedure at Shahid Faghihi Hospital (in Shiraz, Iran) from 2014 to 2018 were retrospectively studied. Patients older than 17 years of age who underwent the Altemeier procedure due to complete rectal prolapse were considered. In some cases, the operation was performed with posterior levatorplasty. Rectal prolapse due to collagen or connective tissue disorders, anal/sacral anomalies, immunodeficiency, history of rectal surgery, and pelvic radiotherapy were the exclusion criteria of the present study. In addition to the demographics (including age, gender, and body mass index), the fecal incontinence status of each case was determined through the Wexner scale preoperatively and 12 months after the surgery. The incontinence scores were then compared against the baseline values of the two groups of patients: those with and those without posterior levatorplasty. The statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US), software, version 21. Results In total, 53 patients (17 men and 36 women) with a mean age of 55.23 ± 18.24 years were analyzed. The comparison of the pre- and postoperative scores on the Wexner scale between the two groups revealed no statistically significant difference (p >0.05). Conclusion Posterior levatorplasty during the Altemeier procedure did not result in significant improvement of the fecal incontinence outcome of the patients.

Robotic Frykman‐Goldberg procedure for complete rectal prolapse – A video vignette

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Sciuto ◽  
Raffaele Emmanuele Maria Pirozzi ◽  
Alfredo Pede ◽  
Gianluca Lanni ◽  
Luca Montesarchio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Complete Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Video Vignette

Reduction of Complete Rectal Prolapse

1992 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 180-180
Author(s):  
D S Bhandarkar ◽  
R G Tamhane
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Complete Rectal Prolapse

scholarly journals Preserving the superior rectal artery in laparoscopic anterior resection for complete rectal prolapse

2002 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ignjatovic ◽  
R. Bergamaschi
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Mesenteric Artery ◽  
Inferior Mesenteric Artery ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Sigmoid Resection ◽  
Complete Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Superior Rectal Artery ◽  
Laparoscopic Anterior Resection

Anterior resection for the treatment of full thickness rectal prolapse has been around for over four decades. 1 However, its use has been limited due to fear of anastomotic leakage and related morbidity. It has been shown that high anterior resection is preferable to its low counterpart as the latter increases complication rates. 2 Although sparing the inferior mesenteric artery in sigmoid resection for diverticular disease has been shown to decrease leak rates in a randomized setting, 3 vascular division is current practice. We shall callenged this current practice of dividing the mesorectum in anterior resection for complete rectal prolapse developing a technique that allows the preservation of the superior rectal artery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document