Comparison of three techniques for calculation of the Parkland formula to aid fluid resuscitation in paediatric burns

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 483-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen Bodger ◽  
Abrie Theron ◽  
David Williams
2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S107-S107
Author(s):  
Jan V Stevens ◽  
Nina Prieto ◽  
Elika Ridelman ◽  
Justin D Klein ◽  
Christina M Shanti

Abstract Introduction Current practice for major pediatric burns includes fluid resuscitation using formulas that estimate fluid requirements based on weight and/or body surface area (BSA) along with percent total burn surface area (TBSA). Adult studies have shown that these formulas can cause fluid overload in obese patients and increase risk of complications. These findings have not been validated in pediatric patients. This study aims to evaluate whether a weight-based resuscitation formula increases the risk of complications in obese children following burn injuries and compares fluid estimates to those that incorporate BSA. Methods A retrospective review was conducted on 110 children (≤ 18 years old) admitted to an ABA-verified urban pediatric burn center from October 2008 to May 2020. Patients had ≥15% TBSA, were resuscitated with the weight-based Parkland formula, and had fluids titrated to urine output every two hours (1 ml/kg/hr if ≤ 30kg; 0.5 ml/kg/hr if > 30kg). Demographics, burn type, and TBSA were collected on admission. BSA-based Galveston and BSA-incorporated Cincinnati formula resuscitation predictions were also calculated. Output and input volumes were collected at 8h and 24h post-injury. Complications were collected throughout the hospital stay. Patients were classified into CDC-defined weight groups based on percentile ranges. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics version 10.0. Results This study included 11 underweight, 60 normal weight, 18 overweight, and 21 obese children. Our patients had a mean age-based weight CDC percentile of 62.2%, and mean TBSA of 25.4%. Predicted resuscitation volumes increased as CDC percentile increased for all three formulas (p=0.033, 0.092, 0.038), however there were no significant differences between overweight and obese children. Total fluid administered was higher as CDC percentile increased (p=0.023). However, overweight children received more total fluid than obese children. The difference between total fluids given and Galveston predicted resuscitation volumes were significant across all groups (p=0.042); however, the difference using the Parkland and Cincinnati formulas were not statistically significant. There were more children in the normal weight group who developed complications compared to other groups, but these findings were not significant. Conclusions The Parkland formula tended to underpredict fluid needs in the underweight, normal weight, and overweight children, and it overpredicted fluid needs for the obese. Further research is needed to determine the value of weight-based vs BSA-based or incorporated formulas in terms of their risk of complications.


2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Cartotto ◽  
Marilyn Innes ◽  
Melinda A. Musgrave ◽  
Manuel Gomez ◽  
Andrew B. Cooper

Author(s):  
Daniel Ardian Soeselo ◽  
Etheldreda Alexandria Stephanie Suparman

BACKGROUND <br />Burns constitute a severe health problem in many countries. In Indonesia burns rank 4th of all trauma-related diseases and are a burden on the country’s health system. Adequate fluid resuscitation is the initial management of burns that determines the success of treatment. This study aimed to determine the relationship between adequate fluid resuscitation and incidence of acute renal failure in burn patients. <br /><br />METHODS<br />A retrospective study of cross-sectional design was conducted on 30 burn patients who came to the Emergency Unit (ER) from January 2015-December 2017. Medical records were reviewed to examine the data on fluid resuscitation according to the Parkland formula and the laboratory data. Acute renal failure was defined as a creatinine level of more than 2.1 mg/dL after 7 days. Hypoalbuminemia was defined as an albumin level of less than 3.4 g/dL. Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the data.<br /><br />RESULTS<br />Twenty-two subjects received fluid resuscitation according to the Parkland formula and 8 did not. Twenty-five experienced complications such as acute renal failure (ARF) (13.3%), hypoalbuminemia (46.7%) and a combination of ARF and hypoalbuminemia (23.3%). One person died. Adequate fluid resuscitation was significantly associated with decrease incidence of ARF (p=0.015), but not significantly with hypoalbuminemia (p=0.214) and with mortality (p=0.267).<br /><br />CONCLUSION<br />Adequate fluid resuscitation decreased the incidence of ARF in burn patients. Consensus protocols for initial burn resuscitation and treatment are crucial to avoid the consequences of ARF after burn injury.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1104-1110
Author(s):  
Anthony P Mai ◽  
Christopher R Fortenbach ◽  
Lucy A Wibbenmeyer ◽  
Kai Wang ◽  
Erin M Shriver

Abstract Burn patients receiving aggressive fluid resuscitation are at risk of developing orbital compartment syndrome (OCS). This condition results in elevated orbital pressures and can lead to rapid permanent vision loss. Risk factors and monitoring frequency for OCS remain largely unknown. A retrospective review was therefore conducted of admitted burn patients evaluated by the ophthalmology service at an American Burn Association verified Burn Treatment Center. Demographic, burn, examination, and fluid resuscitation data were compared using two-sided t-tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and linear regression. Risk factors for elevated intraocular pressures (IOPs; a surrogate for intraorbital pressure) in patients resuscitated via the Parkland formula were found to be total body surface area (% TBSA) burned, resuscitation above the Ivy Index (&gt;250 ml/kg), and Parkland formula calculated volume. Maximum IOP and actual fluid resuscitation volume were linearly related. Analysis of all patients with elevated IOP found multiple patients with significant IOP increases after initial evaluation resulting in OCS within the first 24 hours postinjury. While %TBSA, Ivy Index, and resuscitation calculated volume are OCS risk factors in burn patients, two patients with facial burns developed OCS (25% of all patients with OCS) despite not requiring resuscitation. Orbital congestion can develop within the first 24 hours of admission when resuscitation volumes are the greatest. In addition to earlier and more frequent IOP checks in susceptible burn patients during the first day, the associated risk factors will help identify those most at risk for OCS and vision loss.


1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Wardhana ◽  
Shiera Septrisya

Backgrounds: For decades, fluid resuscitation in burn patients has been done as a routine process; most clinicians continue to adjust volume requirements using Parkland formula for the initial 24- hour period. In a variety of situations, there is increasing recognition of using significantly greater volumes than anticipated by the Parkland formula; clinicians tend to escalate volume requirements to drive the urine output to the higher end of any desired range. This excessive fluid could result in numerous edema-related complications, which currently coined as “fluid creep” phenomenon. Besides optimizing titration of fluid infusion rate, there have been studies of earlier and more liberal use of colloids, and even the use of hypertonic saline. The overall goal is to reduce the resuscitation volume requirements and subsequently, early edema formation.Conclusion: Current research in fluid resuscitation now concentrates on approaches to minimize fluid creep, including tighter control of fluid infusion rate. The single most important principle in using the Parkland formula, however, is that it should be used only as a guideline. The resuscitation rate and volume must be continually adjusted based on the response of the patient. Studies have been demonstrated to compare the use of crystalloids with early colloid in the first 24 hours post burn. At present, there are still wide variations in the timing of colloid resuscitation. However, use of 5% albumin in the second 24 hours seems to be an acceptable alternative.


2019 ◽  
pp. 89-94
Author(s):  
Rowan Pritchard-Jones ◽  
Chris Seaton ◽  
Kayvan Shokrollahi

This chapter guides the reader through the phases of resuscitating a burn-injured patient and monitoring response. It explains when to resuscitate, the reasons fluids are important in the care of burn injured patients and describes the use of both the Parkland Formula and Muir and Barclay Protocol. The chapter further describes how to monitor and respond to the patients changing physiology during fluid resuscitation, and how to identify and respond to myoglobinuria.


2013 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
pp. 142-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Medhat Emil Habib ◽  
Said Al-Busaidi ◽  
Gihan Adly Latif ◽  
Ali Saleem Mehdi ◽  
C. Thomas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document