Interval Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment for Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma: A Feasibility Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 912-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Véronique D’Hondt ◽  
Frédéric Goffin ◽  
Lise Roca ◽  
Damien Dresse ◽  
Chantal Leroy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

ObjectivesWe conducted a phase 2 trial to assess the feasibility of interval cytoreductive surgery (CS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin in patients with stage III and IV pleural ovarian carcinoma in first-line treatment with no macroscopic residual disease after surgery.MethodsPatients could be treated either with primary CS with HIPEC followed by 6 conventional cycles of chemotherapy or with 3 or 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before CS with HIPEC and 3 postoperative chemotherapy cycles. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy was performed with cisplatin (50 mg/m2) for 60 minutes, only in case of complete cytoreduction.ResultsNineteen patients were included in the study, and they all underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy before CS. Sixteen patients underwent complete CS with HIPEC. There was no mortality, and morbidity of CS with HIPEC was acceptable. The HIPEC procedure did not prevent the administration of the standard first-line treatment. In the 16 patients who underwent CS with HIPEC, the outcomes were very good.ConclusionOur study shows an acceptable toxicity of adding HIPEC to the standard first-line treatment in patients with stage III ovarian carcinoma treated with interval CS. Further studies are needed to confirm the role of HIPEC in the treatment of ovarian carcinoma.

Dose-dense carboplatin and paclitaxel versus three weekly regimen in the first-line treatment of ovarian carcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18059-e18059
Author(s):  
Rafaela Pirolli ◽  
Felipe Leonardo Estati ◽  
Viviane Alencar ◽  
Mariana Romero de Oliveira ◽  
Adriana Regina Goncalves Ribeiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Serous Carcinoma ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
First Line Treatment

e18059 Background: The benefit of dose dense chemotherapy (ddCT) in the adjuvant treatment of ovarian carcinoma (OC) is not clear. There is one positive Japanese trial and two negative trials in non-Asian patients, which differed from the JGOG 3016 trial for the use of bevacizumab in one of them and the use of neoadjuvant CT (NCT) in half the patients in the other. In this study, we aimed to compare progression free survival (PFS) of ddCT to conventional regimen. Methods: We did a retrospective review of medical records from patients with OC treated in a Brazilian cancer center from 2007 to 2018. All patients treated with ddCT or conventional carboplatin and paclitaxel regimen (3wCT) in the first line setting were included. PFS and overall survival (OS) were compared. To address selection bias we performed a second analysis in a propensity score matched cohort. Patients were matched according to age, ECOG performance status, CA 125, stage, residual disease and histological subtype, in a 1:2 ratio. Results: A total of 615 cases were enrolled for analysis, 62 were treated with ddCT. Patients treated with ddCT presented better ECOG and more frequently presented advanced stage, high-grade serous carcinoma and residual disease ≤ 1cm. Only 10% of patients were treated with NCT in both groups. In the multivariate analysis ddCT showed a non-significant benefit over conventional CT (PFS HR 0.646, 95% CI 0.384–1.087, p = 0.10). In the propensity score matched cohort 186 patients were included, 62 treated with ddCT and 124 3wCT. Groups were well balanced. After a median follow-up of 48.1 months, median PFS was 32 (18-45.9) versus 22.7 (18.8-26.6) months, favoring dose dense treatment (p = 0.059). In the multivariate cox regression ddCT showed a 45% lower risk of progression (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35–0.88, p = 0.01). Overall survival data is immature, but suggested better outcomes for ddCT (NR versus 76.1 months; p = 0.02). Conclusions: There is no prospective study in a Western population with the same design as the JGOG 3016 trial. In our study, in a population with the same treatment schedules of the Japanese trial, ddCT was associated with longer PFS. This finding suggests that a weekly regimen of paclitaxel might still be a reasonable option for first-line treatment for women with advanced ovarian cancer, and should be further prospectively evaluated.

scholarly journals Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of women with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer

Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 692-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie Elit ◽  
Thomas K. Oliver ◽  
Allan Covens ◽  
Janice Kwon ◽  
Michael Fung-Kee Fung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

scholarly journals Comparison of dose-dense vs. 3-weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer in a propensity score-matched cohort

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafaela Pirolli ◽  
Viviane Teixeira Loiola de Alencar ◽  
Felipe Leonardo Estati ◽  
Adriana Regina Gonçalves Ribeiro ◽  
Daniella Yumi Tsuji Honda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Western Population ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background Benefit of carboplatin and dose-dense weekly paclitaxel (ddCT) in first line treatment of ovarian cancer patients has been different in Western and Asian studies. In the present study we compare progression-free survival (PFS) of ddCT to three-weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (CT) in first-line treatment of ovarian carcinoma in a single institution in a Western population. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective review of medical records from patients with ovarian carcinoma treated in a tertiary cancer center from 2007 to 2018. All patients treated with ddCT or CT in the first-line setting were included. Patients who received first-line bevacizumab were not included. PFS and overall survival (OS) were compared in a propensity score-matched cohort to address selection bias. Patients were matched according to age, ECOG performance status, CA 125, FIGO stage, residual disease, and histological subtype, in a 1:2 ratio. Results Five hundred eighty-eight patients were eligible for propensity score matching, the final cohort consisted of 69 patients treated with ddCT and 138 CT group. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced. After a median follow-up of 65.1 months, median PFS was 29.3 vs 20.0 months, favouring ddCT treatment (p = 0.035). In the multivariate cox regression ddCT showed a 18% lower risk of progression (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68–0.99, p = 0.04). Overall survival data is immature, but suggested better outcomes for ddCT (not reached versus 78.8 months; p = 0.07). Conclusion Our retrospective study has shown superior PFS of ddCT over CT regimen in first-line treatment of ovarian carcinoma in a Western population not treated with bevacizumab.

scholarly journals Selecting the first line treatment in non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma - comparing clinical practice guidelines

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumya Jogi ◽  
Radha Varanai ◽  
Sravani S. Bantu ◽  
Ashish Manne
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Locoregional Therapy ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Tumor Boards ◽  
First Line Treatment

Primary malignancy of the liver or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unique in its presentation, disease process, and management. Unlike breast or colon cancer, the staging of HCC depends on performance status and baseline liver function along with pathological characteristics. Apart from traditional options like surgery and systemic therapy, effective management can be achieved in selected cases with liver transplant and locoregional therapy (LRT) like transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and ablation. Liver study societies and cancer groups across the globe proposed guidelines to aid the treating physicians in choosing first-line treatment for liver cancer. It is tough to compare these guidelines as they differ not only in treatment recommendations but also in risk assessment (and staging). The approach to the same patient may be different in the country he or she is managed. In clinical practice, decisions are usually taken on the consensus of multidisciplinary tumor boards and do not necessarily adhere to any guidelines. In the early (and very early) stage HCC, curative options like surgery, transplant, and ablation are recommended. In intermediate stage HCC, LRT (TACE and TARE) is preferred in the first line and systemic therapy for treatment failure or residual disease. Systemic therapy, including the atezolizumab/bevacizumab combination and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) like sorafenib and lenvatinib, is used for advanced stages. Supportive care is advised for terminal stage HCC.

scholarly journals ATIM-13. MULTIMODAL IMMUNOTHERAPY WITH IO-VAC® FOR PATIENTS WITH GBM: A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi4-vi4
Author(s):  
Stefaan Van Gool ◽  
Jennifer Makalowski ◽  
Wilfried Stuecker
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Antigens ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Autologous Tumor ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product ◽  
Advanced Therapy ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Multimodal immunotherapy (Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) + modulated electrohyperthermia + IO-VAC® + immunomodulatory strategies) is an innovative treatment for primary GBM and might prolong overall survival (OS). IO-VAC® consists of DCs loaded with autologous tumor antigens and matured with cytokine cocktail and NDV. We retrospectively reviewed 132 cases of primary GBM. Multimodal immunotherapy was integrated as individualized treatment approach and following different scenario’s in combination with standard treatment in the first line treatment in 71 patients, used at time of first or subsequent relapse as treatment with or without chemotherapy in 61 cases. Median ages were resp. 55 and 53 y. Median KPI at start of immunotherapy was 90 and 80. Median OS for the patients treated with immunotherapy as part of first-line treatment was 20 months with 2-y OS of 40% (CI95%: -13,+13). Median OS for patients treated at time of relapse was 7 months with but still with 18-m OS of 16% (CI95%: -12,+9). Two resp. 1 patients were lost of follow up. A subgroup of 34 GBM patients (10 females) with median age 58y (20–67) was detected, who received NDV + modulated electrohyperthermia during Temozolomide maintenance cycles followed by two IO-VAC® DC vaccinations, and further NDV + modulated electrohyperthermia courses. Median KPI was 70 (60–100). MGMT status was methylated (12), unmethylated (13), unknown (9). Median OS for this subgroup was 23.4 months with 2-year OS of 48% (CI95%: -18,+20). Immunotherapy was feasible without immunotherapy-related side effects of grade III or more. The data suggest that multimodal immunotherapy with IO-VAC® already during and after maintenance chemotherapy, at time of achieved minimal residual disease with local therapy, might help in prolongation of OS. Prolongation of OS in a small group of patients at time of relapse was also demonstrated. IO-VAC® is an approved advanced therapy medicinal product (DE-NW-04-GMP-2015-0030).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document