scholarly journals V09-06 A NOVEL TECHNIQUE OF CONISATION OF THE URETERO-PELVIC RECONSTRUCTION DURING LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC ASSISTED PYELOPLASTY IN CASES OF URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wael Khoder ◽  
Jacob Michaelis ◽  
Markus Grabbert ◽  
Christian Gratzke ◽  
Alexander Kretschmer ◽  
...  
ISRN Urology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
David D. Thiel

Pyeloplasty is the gold standard therapy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Robotic assisted pyeloplasty has been widely adopted by urologists with and without prior laparoscopic pyeloplasty experience. However, difficult situations encountered during robotic assisted pyeloplasty can significantly add to the difficulty of the operation. This paper provides tips for patient positioning, port placement, robot docking, and intraoperative dissection and repair in patients with the difficult situations of obesity, large floppy liver, difficult to reflect colon (transmesenteric pyeloplasty), crossing vessels, large calculi, and previous attempts at ureteropelvic junction repair. Techniques presented in this paper may aid in the successful completion of robotic assisted pyeloplasty in the face of the difficult situations noted above.


2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Drew A. Freilich ◽  
Hiep T. Nguyen ◽  
Joseph Borer ◽  
Caleb Nelson ◽  
Carlo C. Passerotti

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niwat Lukkanawong ◽  
Masashi Honda ◽  
Shogo Teraoka ◽  
Yusuke Kimura ◽  
Tetsuya Yumioka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The aim of this study is to compare the results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Methods Between March 2008 and May 2019, the patients who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Results Thirteen patients underwent laparoscopically, and 12 patients underwent robotic surgery. The significant difference was found in median operative time between laparoscopic group (296 minutes) and robotic group (199 minutes) (P = 0.001). The median time for drain removal in laparoscopic group was longer than robotic group (3 vs 2 days, respectively, P = 0.029). Conclusions Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is safe and excellent success rates in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. However, our experience study suggested that robotic surgery improves a total operative time, decreases drain removal time and less intraoperative blood loss than laparoscopic approach.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 845.e1-845.e6
Author(s):  
Kristin M. Ebert ◽  
Lauren Nicassio ◽  
Seth A. Alpert ◽  
Christina B. Ching ◽  
Daniel G. Dajusta ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document