scholarly journals MP64-01 PREDICTING RISK OF SIDE-SPECIFIC EXTRAPROSTATIC EXTENSION IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER USING EXPLAINABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jethro Kwong ◽  
Adree Khondker ◽  
Christopher Tran ◽  
Emily Evans ◽  
Amna Ali ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5555-5555
Author(s):  
Okyaz Eminaga ◽  
Andreas Loening ◽  
Andrew Lu ◽  
James D Brooks ◽  
Daniel Rubin

5555 Background: The variation of the human perception has limited the potential of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate in determining prostate cancer and identifying significant prostate cancer. The current study aims to overcome this limitation and utilizes an explainable artificial intelligence to leverage the diagnostic potential of mpMRI in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) and determining its significance. Methods: A total of 6,020 MR images from 1,498 cases were considered (1,785 T2 images, 2,719 DWI images, and 1,516 ADC maps). The treatment determined the significance of PCa. Cases who received radical prostatectomy were considered significant, whereas cases with active surveillance and followed for at least two years were considered insignificant. The negative biopsy cases have either a single biopsy setting or multiple biopsy settings with the PCa exclusion. The images were randomly divided into development (80%) and test sets (20%) after stratifying according to the case in each image type. The development set was then divided into a training set (90%) and a validation set (10%). We developed deep learning models for PCa detection and the determination of significant PCa based on the PlexusNet architecture that supports explainable deep learning and volumetric input data. The input data for PCa detection was T2-weighted images, whereas the input data for determining significant PCa include all images types. The performance of PCa detection and determination of significant PCa was measured using the area under receiving characteristic operating curve (AUROC) and compared to the maximum PiRAD score (version 2) at the case level. The 10,000 times bootstrapping resampling was applied to measure the 95% confidence interval (CI) of AUROC. Results: The AUROC for the PCa detection was 0.833 (95% CI: 0.788-0.879) compared to the PiRAD score with 0.75 (0.718-0.764). The DL models to detect significant PCa using the ADC map or DWI images achieved the highest AUROC [ADC: 0.945 (95% CI: 0.913-0.982; DWI: 0.912 (95% CI: 0.871-0.954)] compared to a DL model using T2 weighted (0.850; 95% CI: 0.791-0.908) or PiRAD scores (0.604; 95% CI: 0.544-0.663). Finally, the attention map of PlexusNet from mpMRI with PCa correctly showed areas that contain PCa after matching with corresponding prostatectomy slice. Conclusions: We found that explainable deep learning is feasible on mpMRI and achieves high accuracy in determining cases with PCa and identifying cases with significant PCa.


Author(s):  
Renato Cuocolo ◽  
Arnaldo Stanzione ◽  
Riccardo Faletti ◽  
Marco Gatti ◽  
Giorgio Calleris ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To build a machine learning (ML) model to detect extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer (PCa), based on radiomics features extracted from prostate MRI index lesions. Methods Consecutive MRI exams of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for PCa were retrospectively collected from three institutions. Axial T2-weighted and apparent diffusion coefficient map images were annotated to obtain index lesion volumes of interest for radiomics feature extraction. Data from one institution was used for training, feature selection (using reproducibility, variance and pairwise correlation analyses, and a correlation-based subset evaluator), and tuning of a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, with stratified 10-fold cross-validation. The model was tested on the two remaining institutions’ data and compared with a baseline reference and expert radiologist assessment of EPE. Results In total, 193 patients were included. From an initial dataset of 2436 features, 2287 were excluded due to either poor stability, low variance, or high collinearity. Among the remaining, 14 features were used to train the ML model, which reached an overall accuracy of 83% in the training set. In the two external test sets, the SVM achieved an accuracy of 79% and 74% respectively, not statistically different from that of the radiologist (81–83%, p = 0.39–1) and outperforming the baseline reference (p = 0.001–0.02). Conclusions A ML model solely based on radiomics features demonstrated high accuracy for EPE detection and good generalizability in a multicenter setting. Paired to qualitative EPE assessment, this approach could aid radiologists in this challenging task. Key Points • Predicting the presence of EPE in prostate cancer patients is a challenging task for radiologists. • A support vector machine algorithm achieved high diagnostic accuracy for EPE detection, with good generalizability when tested on multiple external datasets. • The performance of the algorithm was not significantly different from that of an experienced radiologist.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document