Percutaneous Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated with Improved Short- and Long-Term Survival

ASAIO Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Hryniewicz ◽  
Yader Sandoval ◽  
Michael Samara ◽  
Mosi Bennett ◽  
Barry Cabuay ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petter Schiller ◽  
Laila Hellgren ◽  
Per Vikholm

Objectives: Survival after different short-term mechanical circulatory support is difficult to compare because various systems are used and patient disease severity is most often not adjusted for. This study compares the outcome after the use of Impella and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in refractory cardiogenic shock, adjusted for disease severity through the survival after the VA-ECMO (SAVE) score. Methods: Patients with refractory shock treated with either VA-ECMO or Impella between January 2003 and August 2015 were included. Data were analysed to assess short and long-term survival and complications. The SAVE score was calculated for the two groups and outcome was compared adjusted for the SAVE score. Results: There was no difference between VA-ECMO patients ( n=46) and Impella patients ( n=48) in mean age or renal failure. ECMO patients were more often intubated and had lower diastolic blood pressure at device implantation. ECMO patients had a lower SAVE score (–0.4 (6.5)) compared to Impella patients (4.1 (5.4)). There was no difference in intensive care unit survival between ECMO patients 65% (52–80) or Impella patients 63% (55–79), or long-term survival between groups. When stratified into worse (III–IV) or better SAVE class (I–II) there was no difference in survival between the groups. Conclusions: Short and long-term survival is not measurably different among patients treated with Impella or VA-ECMO due to refractory cardiogenic shock, after adjustment for disease severity through the SAVE score.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 949-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidan J.C. Burrell ◽  
Vincent A. Pellegrino ◽  
Rory Wolfe ◽  
Wen Kai Wong ◽  
David Jamie Cooper ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Meani ◽  
Matteo Matteucci ◽  
Federica Jiritano ◽  
Dario Fina ◽  
Francesco Panzeri ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 747
Author(s):  
Georgios Chatzis ◽  
Styliani Syntila ◽  
Birgit Markus ◽  
Holger Ahrens ◽  
Nikolaos Patsalis ◽  
...  

Since mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become integral component in the therapy of refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS), we identified 67 patients in biventricular support with Impella and venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for RCS between February 2013 and December 2019 and evaluated the risk factors of mortality in this setting. Mean age was 61.07 ± 10.7 and 54 (80.6%) patients were male. Main cause of RCS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (74.6%), while 44 (65.7%) were resuscitated prior to admission. The mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA) score on admission was 73.54 ± 16.03 and 12.25 ± 2.71, respectively, corresponding to an expected mortality of higher than 80%. Vasopressor doses and lactate levels were significantly decreased within 72 h on biventricular support (p < 0.05 for both). Overall, 17 (25.4%) patients were discharged to cardiac rehabilitation and 5 patients (7.5%) were bridged successfully to ventricular assist device implantation, leading to a total of 32.8% survival on hospital discharge. The 6-month survival was 31.3%. Lactate > 6 mmol/L, vasoactive score > 100 and pH < 7.26 on initiation of biventricular support, as well as Charlson comorbity index > 3 and prior resuscitation were independent predictors of survival. In conclusion, biventricular support with Impella and VA-ECMO in patients with RCS is feasible and efficient leading to a better survival than predicted through traditional risk scores, mainly via significant hemodynamic improvement and reduction in lactate levels.


2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 854-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian A. Bermudez ◽  
Prasad S. Adusumilli ◽  
Kenneth R. McCurry ◽  
Diana Zaldonis ◽  
Maria M. Crespo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document