Changes in bleeding patterns in von Willebrand disease after institution of long-term replacement therapy

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Holm ◽  
Thomas C. Abshire ◽  
Joel Bowen ◽  
M. Teresa Álvarez ◽  
Paula Bolton-Maggs ◽  
...  
Haematologica ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (9) ◽  
pp. 1486-1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin P.M. van Galen ◽  
Piet de Kleijn ◽  
Wouter Foppen ◽  
Jeroen Eikenboom ◽  
Karina Meijer ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (04) ◽  
pp. 326-338
Author(s):  
Ulrike Nowak-Göttl ◽  
Wolfgang Miesbach ◽  
Jürgen Koscielny ◽  
Carl-Erik Dempfle ◽  
Marc Maegele ◽  
...  

AbstractIn patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD), replacement therapy may be indicated in the case of spontaneous bleeding, surgical interventions and injuries/trauma or as a prophylaxis of spontaneous bleeding episodes. The deficient von Willebrand factor (VWF) is replaced with or without factor VIII (FVIII). Dual VWF/FVIII concentrates can be beneficial in the case of low FVIII level, while repeated dosing may lead to very high FVIII levels, with a potential thrombogenic effect in individual VWD patients. An excessive FVIII:C increase can be limited by using a VWF product with a low level of FVIII, achieving a haemostatic adequate FVIII:C increase after 6 to 12 hours. Replacement therapy in patients with VWD shall be individualised considering VWD type, history and risk of bleeding and risk of thrombosis, as well as indication and the individually variable VWF and FVIII increase. Deviations from the dosages and minimum trough levels mentioned in guidelines or recommendations can be considered in justified cases. The objective of this review is to provide recommendations for specific constellations of replacement therapy based on the VWD-specific guidelines available in Europe, the available evidence, own experiences and the consensus of the interdisciplinary German author group.


Blood Reviews ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 100572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flora Peyvandi ◽  
Peter Kouides ◽  
Peter L. Turecek ◽  
Edward Dow ◽  
Erik Berntorp

Vox Sanguinis ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Rodeghiero ◽  
Giancarlo Castaman ◽  
Dominique Meyer ◽  
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Anushka Bhaskar ◽  
Nathan T. Connell

Introduction: von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder with significant variability in clinical phenotype. Patients with the most severe forms of VWD suffer from frequent bleeding complications including mucosal bleeding, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, hemarthrosis, and muscle hematomas. Long-term prophylaxis with von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrate has been shown to reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes, but higher costs associated with regular VWF concentrate administration remains a barrier to access. Methods: We constructed a Markov state transition model to compare the cost-effectiveness of on-demand treatment (ODT) with long-term prophylaxis (PRO) from a United States (US) societal perspective with costs inflated to 2020 US dollars using the Consumer Price Index. Cycle-length was one month with a one-year time horizon and during each cycle, patients could experience either major (hemarthrosis, gastrointestinal bleeding, muscle hematoma), minor (epistaxis, other mucosal bleeding), or no bleeding. Model inputs for event probabilities, costs, and utility were obtained from previously published literature; while there are no specific utility data for these treatment strategies in VWD patients, we assumed they would be similar to published age-specific utilities used in hemophilia analyses and performed sensitivity analyses to assess these assumptions. The base case scenario was modeled on a 70 kg patient with severe VWD receiving plasma-derived VWF concentrate. In the PRO strategy, patients received 60 units/kg every 3 days. ODT patients were only treated for specific bleeding events (minor bleeding: 60 units/kg every 12 hours for 3 days in the outpatient setting; major bleeding: VWF concentrate 60 units/kg every 12 hours for 5 days in the hospital). Microsimulation of 1000 trials was performed using to calculate mean quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs associated with the two treatment strategies. TreeAge Pro 2017 (TreeAge Software, Williamstown, MA) was used to construct the model and perform analyses. Results: In the base-case scenario using plasma-derived VWF concentrate, on-demand treatment resulted in a mean cost of US$1,140,586 (± $65,215) generating 0.52 QALYs (±0.01) while the prophylaxis strategy resulted in a mean cost of US$918,329 (± $94,983) generating 0.8 QALYs (±0.04). The microsimulation was repeated to reflect the cost of recombinant VWF concentrate for prophylaxis and a single dose of recombinant factor VIII. Using recombinant VWF, on-demand treatment resulted in a mean cost of US$1,568,005 (± $94206) and generated 0.52 QALYs (±0.01) while the prophylaxis strategy resulted in a mean cost of US$1,343,715 (± $124,974) and generated 0.8 QALYs (±0.04). One-way sensitivity analysis of model inputs showed this result to be robust, as prophylaxis remained the preferred strategy at a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of US$150,000/QALY for both plasma-derived and recombinant therapies (Figure). Conclusions: With greater effectiveness and lower total societal health care costs, the prophylaxis strategy dominated the on-demand treatment strategy. While the cost of long-term prophylaxis is primarily due to the high cost of VWF concentrate every 3 days, this strategy results in significantly fewer bleeding episodes per year resulting in more QALYs. Our findings suggest that when compared to on-demand treatment, long-term prophylaxis with VWF concentrate is a cost-effective strategy in patients with severe forms of VWD, which helps to avoid expensive hospitalizations and decreased quality of life due to bleeding episodes and their complications. Figure 1 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3961-3961
Author(s):  
John T. Salter ◽  
Amy D. Shapiro ◽  
Matt Sulkin ◽  
Meadow Heiman ◽  
Anne Greist ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Type 2M Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) results from a mutation in the Von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene resulting in decreased or absent binding to platelet glycoprotein Ib. Bleeding episodes in type 2M VWD are variable, but can be severe or life-threatening; effective treatment requires administration of exogenous normal VWF. Pregnant women with type 2M VWD require close monitoring to prevent adverse bleeding events. Following a fatal post-partum hemorrhage in a woman from a large kindred with type 2M VWD, routine prophylactic doses of VWF were administered both pre- and postpartum to women with this disorder. This population is uninsured and utilized product is donated for their care. To determine if the amount of VWF could be safely reduced, a tiered risk stratification and replacement therapy program was developed to manage women with type 2M vWD during labor, delivery and the peuperium. We report the results of this tiered risk stratification in terms of the total product utilized and the rate of bleeding experienced. Methods: Between Jan–Mar 2007, we followed 7 Amish women from a large kindred with type 2M VWD (mutation 4120 C-->T on exon 28). This rural community has limited access to sophisticated hematologic monitoring and is uninsured. Women were risk stratified into 1 of 3 tiers (T) based on their personal or immediate family history of bleeding with childbirth. A nurse provided peripartum monitoring via home visits on postpartum days 1, 3, 5, 10 with a portable hematocrit (Hct) machine. Women in T1 were at lowest risk and given VWF replacement only in the event of excessive bleeding or postpartum Hct <30; T2 (intermediate risk) were given a single prophylactic VWF replacement dose immediately prior to delivery then monitored as T1; T3 received prophylactic VWF dose immediately prior to delivery, at 12 hours postpartum, then monitored by serial Hct per the other tiers. Women requiring Cesarean section were placed into T3 but treated with further VWF replacement due to the surgical intervention. Results: The 7 women fell into the following tiers; T1: 4; T2: 2; T3: 1. Of the 4 women in T1, none experienced excessive bleeding and no VWF therapy was required. In the 2 women in T2, there were no bleeding events requiring additional VWF. Postpartum Hct remained >30 on all evaluations in T1 and 2. One woman was delivered by elective caesarean section for complicated twin pregnancy, and given VWF prior to surgery and once daily for three consecutive postoperative days. She had no bleeding complications, and maintained Hct >30. Compared with the prior method of required pre- and post-partum prophylactic VWF administration regardless of tier or Hct, this pilot protocol safely decreased VWF usage in women assigned to T1 and 2 without adverse bleeding outcome or the need for transfusion. Conclusions: Women with type 2M VWD can be safely managed with a tiered risk stratification system and close postpartum clinical/Hct monitoring that utilizes conservative VWF replacement. For T1 and 2 this lead to a reduction in VWF administration of 83% compared with the prior method of mandatory pre- and postpartum VWF administration. This further translated into a substantial cost savings while still achieving safe hemostatic outcomes. Women at highest risk continue to receive prophylactic VWF pre- and postpartum to prevent serious hemorrhagic events.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 236-236
Author(s):  
Erik Berntorp ◽  
Thomas C. Abshire ◽  
Augusto B. Federici

Abstract 236 The bleeding patterns of severe von Willebrand Disease (VWD), mainly type 3, adversely affect short- and long-term quality of life, and may be life threatening. The index case of VWD, described by Erik von Willebrand in 1926, was a girl who had a history of serious bleeds from mucous membranes and ankles, and died during her fourth menstrual period. There is no doubt that there is a role for long-term prophylaxis with VWF-containing concentrates, but the experience is scarce and restricted to a retrospective follow-up of 37 patients in Sweden, and a few other small cohorts in Europe. All studies have shown favorable results; however, unresolved issues remain, such as to whom prophylaxis should be given, optimal dose and dose interval, and when to start. The von Willebrand Disease Prophylaxis Network (VWD PN) was formed to investigate the role of prophylaxis in clinically severe VWD that is non-responsive to other treatment(s). The VWD International Prophylaxis (VIP) Study, a combination of prospective and retrospective studies, is an initiative of the VWD PN. Using a retrospective study design, the effect of prophylaxis on bleeding frequency was studied among 39 individuals enrolled from 11 centers in Europe and North America. Data were collected from center records, diaries, and bleeding logs. The period of study was one year prior to start of prophylaxis plus at least 6 months following onset of treatment. Subject demographics, VWD type, and primary bleeding indication for prophylaxis were collected. Annualized bleeding rates were calculated for the period prior to onset of prophylaxis, during prophylaxis for the total group, and by primary bleeding indication defined as the most frequent bleeding symptom. In 4 cases, data were not available to identify the primary indication. Differences (after – before) were calculated. The Wilcoxan Signed Rank test of the differences in the medians was used. The median age (range) at onset of prophylaxis was 29 years (2 to 76). Fifty-one percent were female and 49% male. The vast majority were of European descent, 84.6%, with 12.8% and 2.6% reported as Hispanic and of African descent, respectively. Type 3 VWD accounted for the largest number: 24 (61.5%). Two subjects (5.1%) were type 1, 7 (18.0%) type 2A, 5 (12.8%) type 2B, and 1 (2.6%) type 2M. The usual number of infusions of VWF during prophylaxis was 2 to 3 times per week, with a median usual dose of 45 U VWF:RCo per kg per infusion. The median (range) number of bleeding episodes per year prior to the onset of prophylaxis was 12 (2 – 54), compared to a median (range) of 4 (0 – 24) during prophylaxis, p<0.0001. Changes in bleeding for the total group, as well as the most common primary indications for prophylaxis, are shown in the figure. In 7 cases (not included in the figure) the bleeding pattern was mixed with no primary indication (N=3), or the primary indications occurred with low frequency (N=4). Annualized bleeding rates were lower during prophylaxis for all primary indications, and significantly so (p<0.05) for joint bleeding, epistaxis and GI bleeding. When we examined the effect of prophylaxis by age for subjects <18, and those ≥18, we found that it was similar in both groups. The median number of bleeds per year during prophylaxis was significantly lower, p=0.001 and p<0.0001 respectively, compared to the number prior to prophylaxis. While the primary indications of epistaxis and joint bleeding occurred with similar frequency in both age groups, GI bleeding and menorrhagia were not reported as the primary bleeding indication for prophylaxis for anyone <18. We conclude from this international, multi-center cohort that prophylactic treatment of VWD is efficacious. A network-initiated prospective study is underway, the objectives of which are to provide guidelines for dosing, and address issues of cost-effectiveness and quality of life. Disclosures: Berntorp: CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding. Abshire:CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding. Federici:CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding.


2008 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Erik Berntorp ◽  
Sharyne M Donfield ◽  
Thomas C Abshire ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document