Characteristics of State Policies Impact Health Care Delivery, Medical Care, September 2018

Medical Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Michal Horný ◽  
Richard Duszak

A method of detailed technological planning is described in which a subsystem of the total health care delivery system is identified, and the components within it created and integrated with one another. The components produced are termed a microplan, since they concern planning for technical detail. A project for microplanning in Indonesia is discussed, and some of the promising features of the new method described.


Medical Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Michal Horný ◽  
Michael Shwartz ◽  
Richard Duszak ◽  
Cindy L. Christiansen ◽  
Alan B. Cohen ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 20 (02) ◽  
pp. 197-201
Author(s):  
John F. Hoadley

Fact: As a nation, medical care expenditures represent 10.6% of the gross national product. The portion of the nation's medical care dollar coming from federal sources declined slightly (42.6% to 41.4%) between 1981 and 1984, but this share is more than 15 percentage points above the comparable figure from the years prior to 1965 (Anderson, 1985).As these numbers illustrate, paying for health care is a very expensive proposition in the United States, consuming a higher proportion of our nation's resources than is true for most developed nations. While we have strongly resisted any move to a government-run system of health care delivery, the above numbers also show clearly that the federal government pays for a substantial share of all health care in this country.Three major themes have dominated the health policy agenda during recent years: access to health care, cost containment, and quality of care. The fates of these issues have waxed and waned over the years as changes in health care delivery, federal budgetary politics, and shifting public opinion have altered the environment over time. In the 1960s, access was the key issue, as Democratic administrations used government programs to make health care more readily available to all Americans. As inflation levels soared in the 1970s, cost containment was forced onto the agenda, resulting in a series of attempts to reduce federal expenditures on hospital care. Finally, by the mid-1980s, cost containment pressures were modifying slightly; we have recently witnessed a return to access issues and the emergence of quality as a new political issue.


2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris MacKnight ◽  
Colin Powell

Why measure?Before we consider what to measure and how to measure outcomes in the rehabilitation of frail older adults, an antecedent question is, why measure these things? Without an answer satisfactory for both measurers and measured, much effort and ingenuity will be expended with resultant perspiration and exasperation and little else.Traditionally, medical care, i.e. that identified by physicians, has assumed that its principal objective was patient care, i.e. that appreciated by patients. Outcomes of care from the viewpoint of the patient, of his or her informal supporters, of the involved health care professionals, and of the health care delivery system have to be clarified and made operationally explicit. This recognition requires definition and measurement. Thus a powerful reason for measuring outcomes for recipients and providers of health care, as well as the health care delivery system, is to know what is happening (the descriptive question) and with what effect (the analytical question).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document