Comparison Between Real-Time PCR and Pyrosequencing for Detection of BRAF V600E Mutation in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspirates

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 358-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wook Youn Kim ◽  
Hyunkyung Kim ◽  
Tae Sook Hwang ◽  
Seo Young Oh
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyun Liu ◽  
Leticia Loredo ◽  
Houquan Dai ◽  
Aaron Castro ◽  
Yuewei Zhao ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 759-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongjun Jeong ◽  
Yujun Jeong ◽  
Ji Hye Park ◽  
Sun Wook Han ◽  
Sung Yong Kim ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2635-2635
Author(s):  
Mark Ewalt ◽  
Subhadra Nandula ◽  
Adrienne A. Phillips ◽  
Vundavalli Murty ◽  
Mahesh Mansukhani ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2635 BACKGROUND: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare type of B-cell non Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), which is characterized by neoplastic cells exhibiting slender cytoplasmic projections and an activated phenotype. Unlike other B-NHL, HCL lacks characteristic recurrent chromosome abnormalities and its etiology remains elusive. Recently, the BRAF V600E mutation was described to occur at a high frequency in HCL in contrast to other B-NHL, suggesting that the BRAF V600E mutation could represent a disease defining lesion and a possible therapeutic target. In this study, we determined the prevalence of the BRAF V600E mutation in a large series of low and intermediate grade B-NHL and assessed the relationship of this mutation, if any, with microsatellite instability (MSI). METHODS: DNA was extracted from various low and intermediate grade B-NHL (n=100), as defined by the 2008 World Health Organization Classification, which comprised HCL (n=10 from 6 patients), chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=22), mantle cell lymphoma (n=19), marginal zone lymphoma (n=22), follicular lymphoma (n=20) and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=7). Percentage of neoplastic cells was assessed by flow cytometry (n=99) or immunohistochemistry (n=1). Presence of BRAF V600E mutation was determined using a real time PCR assay using allele-specific hydrolysis (“Taqman”) probes. The detection limit of the assay was determined by diluting DNA extracted from a fresh HCL sample with normal high molecular weight DNA extracted by the same method. MSI analysis was performed using a multiplex reaction for 5 quasi monomorphic mononucleotide repeat markers (BAT-25, BAT-26, MONO-27, NR-21 and NR-24) and two highly polymorphic penta nucleotide markers (Penta C and Penta D) as sample identifiers. In the absence of normal DNA for comparison, a sample was considered MSI-H if greater than two markers showed an altered pattern, indeterminate if only two showed an alteration and MSS if no marker showed an altered allele. RESULTS: The ubiquitous occurrence and high specificity of the BRAF V600E mutation for HCL was confirmed in our series of B-NHL. The HCL samples consisted of 10 specimens from 6 patients and were the initial diagnostic specimen in 2 patients. The percentage of neoplastic cells in these samples ranged from 1% to 78.4% (median 18.2%). The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 7 of 10 (70%) samples of HCL from 5 of 6 (83%) patients. The proportion of hairy cells was ≤5% in samples where the mutation was not detected. All 90 of the other low and intermediate grade B-NHL (>50% tumor burden) were negative for the V600E mutation. Compared to the reported sensitivity of approximately 30% tumor cells for detecting the BRAF V600E mutation by Sanger sequencing, our real time PCR assay allowed detection of the mutation in samples containing ≥9.8% tumor cells. Analysis of the HCL cases for MSI revealed that all cases had a microsatellite stable (MSS) phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: The BRAF V600E mutation appears specific for HCL among low and intermediate grade B-NHL and is not associated with microsatellite instability. These characteristics thus warrant inclusion in disease definition. Further refinements of a realtime PCR based approach for detecting the BRAF V600E mutation might be of utility in diagnosis and disease monitoring, as the neoplastic cellular yield is often limited in HCL due to underlying myelofibrosis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Cytopathology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanupriya Agrawal ◽  
Liqiang Xi ◽  
Winnifred Navarro ◽  
Mark Raffeld ◽  
Snehal B. Patel ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Ståhlberg ◽  
Pierre Åman ◽  
Börje Ridell ◽  
Petter Mostad ◽  
Mikael Kubista

Abstract Background: An abnormal IgLκ:IgLλ ratio has long been used as a clinical criterion for non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas. As a first step toward a quantitative real-time PCR-based multimarker diagnostic analysis of lymphomas, we have developed a method for determination of IgLκ:IgLλ ratio in clinical samples. Methods: Light-up probe-based real-time PCR was used to quantify IgLκ and IgLλ cDNA from 32 clinical samples. The samples were also investigated by routine immunohistochemical analysis and flow cytometry. Results: Of 32 suspected non-Hodgkin lymphoma samples analyzed, 28 were correctly assigned from real-time PCR measurements assuming invariant PCR efficiencies in the biological samples. Four samples were false negatives. One was a T-cell lymphoma, one was a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and one was reanalyzed and found lymphoma-positive by in situ calibration, which takes into account sample-specific PCR inhibition. Twelve of the samples were fine-needle aspirates, and these were all correctly assigned. Conclusions: This work is a first step toward analyzing clinical samples by quantitative light-up probe-based real-time PCR. Quantitative real-time PCR appears suitable for high-throughput testing of cancers by measuring expression of tumor markers in fine-needle aspirates.


2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 190-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Ewalt ◽  
Subhadra Nandula ◽  
Adrienne Phillips ◽  
Bachir Alobeid ◽  
Vundavalli V. Murty ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 2644-2650 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet ◽  
J. A. Lindeboom ◽  
J. M. Prins ◽  
M. F. Peeters ◽  
E. C. J. Claas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document