Third-Generation Dual-Source Computed Tomography for Coronary Angiography With Individually Tailored Scan Protocols Can Achieve a Low Radiation Dose With Good Image Quality in Unselected Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeliz Basar ◽  
Tugana Akbas ◽  
Deniz Alis ◽  
Sıla Ulus ◽  
Cagdas Topel ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 119 (8) ◽  
pp. 1156-1161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Apfaltrer ◽  
Dieter H. Szolar ◽  
Eric Wurzinger ◽  
Richard A.P. Takx ◽  
John W. Nance ◽  
...  

Dose-Response ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 155932581880583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Forte ◽  
Serena Monti ◽  
Chiara Anna Parente ◽  
Lukas Beyer ◽  
Roberto De Rosa ◽  
...  

Purpose: To compare image quality and radiation dose among different protocols in patients who underwent a 128-slice dual source computed tomography coronary angiography (DSCT-CTCA). Methods: Ninety patients were retrospectively grouped according to heart rate (HR): 26 patients (group A) with stable HR ≤60 bpm were acquired using high pitch spiral mode (FLASH); 48 patients (group B) with irregular HR ≤60 bpm or stable HR between 60 and 70 bpm using step and shoot mode; and 16 patients (group C) with irregular HR >60 bpm or stable HR ≥70 bpm by retrospective electrocardiogram pulsing acquisition. Signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) were measured for the main vascular structures. Moreover, the dose-length product and the effective dose were assessed. Results: Both SNR and CNR were higher in group A compared to group C (18.27 ± 0.32 vs 11.22 ± 0.50 and 16.75 ± 0.32 vs 10.17 ± 0.50; P = .001). The effective dose was lower in groups A and B (2.09 ± 1.27 mSv and 4.60 ± 2.78 mSv, respectively) compared to group C (9.61 ± 5.95 mSv) P < .0001. Conclusion: The correct selection of a low-dose, HR-matched CTCA scan protocol with a DSCT scanner provides substantial reduction of radiation exposure and better SNR and CNR.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Joon Choi ◽  
So Hyun Park ◽  
Seong Ho Park ◽  
Seong Yong Pak ◽  
Jae Won Choi ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveTo compare the radiation dose, objective and subjective image quality, and diagnostic performances of 80 kVp and 80/150 kVp with tin filter (80/Sn150 kVp) computed tomography (CT) in oncology patients.MethodsOne hundred forty-five consecutive oncology patients who underwent third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT of the abdomen for evaluation of malignant visceral, peritoneal, extraperitoneal, and bone tumor were retrospectively recruited. Two radiologists independently reviewed each observation in 80 kVp CT and 80/Sn150 kVp CT. Modified line-density profile of the tumor and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Diagnostic confidence, lesion conspicuity, and subjective image quality were calculated and compared between image sets.ResultsModified line-density profile analysis revealed higher attenuation differences between the tumor and the normal tissue in 80 kVp CT than in 80/Sn150 kVp CT (127 vs. 107, P = 0.05). The 80 kVp CT showed increased CNR in the liver (8.0 vs. 7.6) and the aorta (18.9 vs. 16.3) than the 80/Sn150 kVp CT. The 80 kVp CT yielded higher enhancement of organs (4.9 ± 0.2 vs. 4.7 ± 0.4, P < 0.001) and lesion conspicuity (4.9 ± 0.3 vs. 4.8 ± 0.5, P = 0.035) than the 80/Sn150 kVp CT; overall image quality and confidence index were comparable. The effective dose reduced by 45.2% with 80 kVp CT (2.3 mSv ± 0.9) compared to 80/Sn150 kVp CT (4.1 mSv ± 1.5).ConclusionsThe 80 kVp CT performed similar or better than 80/Sn150 kVp CT for abdominal tumor evaluation with 45.2% radiation dose reduction in oncology patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document