Transection of Inferior Orbital Fissure Contents for Improved Access and Visibility in Orbital Surgery

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 557-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Ricketts ◽  
Hall F. Chew ◽  
Ian R. P. Sunderland ◽  
Alex Kiss ◽  
Jeffrey A. Fialkov
2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (04) ◽  
pp. 333-347
Author(s):  
Laura Salgado-López ◽  
Luciano C.P. Campos-Leonel ◽  
Carlos D. Pinheiro-Neto ◽  
María Peris-Celda

AbstractAdvances in skull base and orbital surgery have led to an increased need to understand the anatomy of the orbit and surrounding structures to safely perform surgeries in this area. The purpose of this article is to review the surrounding anatomy of the orbit from a practical and operative point of view. We describe the orbit from an inferomedial endoscopic endonasal perspective (focusing on its inferior relationship with the maxillary sinus and related structures and its medial relationship with the ethmoid bone), from a posterior and superolateral intracranial perspective (describing the anatomy of the superior orbital fissure, optic canal, inferior orbital fissure, cavernous sinus, orbitofrontal cortex, and surrounding dura) and from an anterior perspective (focusing on the muscles, connective tissue, lateral and medial canthus, and relevant neurovascular anatomy). A deep knowledge of the critical neurovascular and osseous structures surrounding the orbit is necessary for adequately choosing and performing the most favorable orbital approach in every case.


Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Pekař ◽  
H. Bohutová ◽  
P. Diblík ◽  
A. Nejedý ◽  
J. Mazánek

2021 ◽  
Vol 82 (01) ◽  
pp. 081-090
Author(s):  
Jacquelyn Laplant ◽  
Kimberly Cockerham

Abstract Objective Primary orbital malignancy is rare. Awareness of the characteristic clinical and imaging features is imperative for timely identification and management. Surgery remains an important diagnostic and treatment modality for primary orbital malignancy, but determining the optimal surgical approach can be challenging. The purpose of this article is to explore recent advances in the diagnosis, management, and surgical approaches for primary orbital malignancies. Design In this review, the clinical presentation, imaging features, and medical and surgical management of primary orbital malignancies with representative cases will be discussed. Setting Outpatient and inpatient hospital settings. Participants Patients with diagnosed primary orbital malignancies. Main Outcome Measures Descriptive outcomes. Results Advancements in orbital imaging, microsurgical techniques, and multimodal therapy have improved the diagnosis and management of primary orbital malignancies. Special considerations for biopsy or resection are made based on the tumor's location, characteristics, nearby orbital structures, and goals of surgery. Minimally invasive techniques are supplanting traditional approaches to orbital surgery with less morbidity. Conclusions Advances in imaging technologies and surgical techniques have facilitated the diagnosis and management of primary orbital malignancies. Evolution toward less invasive orbital surgery with focus on preservation and restoration of function is underway.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Hwi Park ◽  
Inhye Kim ◽  
Jun Hyuk Son

Abstract Background Retrobulbar hemorrhage (RBH) is a rare complication after orbital surgery but associated with ocular complications including blindness. The aim of this study was to identify clinical characteristics of patients with RBH requiring emergent orbital decompression after blowout fracture repair. Method A retrospective review of 426 blowout fracture patients at a tertiary oculoplastic clinic provided data regarding demographics, physical examination findings, and computed tomography (CT) images. Extraocular motility had been recorded in patient charts on a scale from 0 to − 4. Patients requiring emergent orbital decompression due to RBH after surgery (RBH group) were compared with those who did not (Control group), using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Incidences of RBH according to primary or secondary surgery were also investigated, using Fisher’s exact test. Result Five (1.2%) of the 426 patients who underwent blowout fracture repair developed RBH requiring emergent intervention. All RBH patients fully recovered after the decompression procedure or conservative treatment. Number of days to surgery was significantly longer in the RBH group (97.0 ± 80.1) than in the Control group (29.0 ± 253.0) (p = 0.05). Preoperative enophthalmos was also significantly greater in the RBH group (RBH vs. Control group, 3.6 ± 1.7 mm versus 1.2 ± 1.3 mm (p = 0.003)). The incidence of RBH was significantly higher in patients that underwent secondary surgery (odds ratio = 92.9 [95% confidence interval, 11.16–773.23], p = 0.001). Conclusions Surgeons should pay more attention to hemostasis and postoperative care in patients with a large preoperative enophthalmic eye, when time from injury to surgery is long and in revision cases. When RBH occurs, time to intervention and surgical decompression is critical for visual recovery and preventing blindness. Trial registration The institutional review board of the Yeungnam University Medical Center approved this study (YUMC 2018-11-010), which was conducted in accord with the Declaration of Helsinki.


2006 ◽  
Vol 135 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P227-P227
Author(s):  
Petra U. Lohnstein ◽  
Joerg Schipper ◽  
Wolfgang Maier

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-319
Author(s):  
P. Tan ◽  
W.F. Siah ◽  
R. Malhotra
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Norms ◽  
Gilbert W. Cleasby
Keyword(s):  

Orbit ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Delle Noci ◽  
F. Mininni ◽  
C. Iaculli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document