Effect of Emergency Department Care on Outcomes in Pediatric Trauma: What Approaches Make a Difference in Quality of Care?

2007 ◽  
Vol 63 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S136-S139 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Denise Dowd
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Emergency Department Care

scholarly journals Accessibility and quality of care received in emergency departments by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 648 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P Thomas ◽  
Ian P Anderson ◽  
Margaret A Kelaher
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Torres Strait Islander ◽  
Torres Strait Islander People ◽  
Similar Time ◽  
Emergency Department Care ◽  
Torres Strait

Objectives: To examine the accessibility and quality of care received in emergency departments by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people compared with other Australians. Methods: We examined 2004?05 data from the National Non-admitted Patient Emergency Department Care database from the Northern Territory and Western Australia, the only jurisdictions where Indigenous identification in the database was considered acceptable. Results: In the NT, Indigenous people were 1.7 times as likely to present to an emergency department as non-Indigenous people. Indigenous patients in the NT and WA do not appear to use EDs for ?primary care? problems more than non- Indigenous patients. More NT Indigenous patients walked out before being seen or before their treatment was completed. However, Indigenous patients generally waited a similar time, and often slightly shorter, to be seen as similar non-Indigenous patients in WA and the NT. Conclusions: We recommend the regular monitoring of equity in the accessibility and quality of ED care for Indigenous people compared with other Australians. Indigenous identification in the database needs to improve so monitoring of ED performance can extend beyond WA and the NT.

scholarly journals National Trends in Emergency Department Care Processes for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2005 to 2015

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshay Pendyal ◽  
Craig Rothenberg ◽  
Jean E. Scofi ◽  
Harlan M. Krumholz ◽  
Basmah Safdar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Real World ◽  
The United States ◽  
Emergency Department Care ◽  
Care Processes ◽  
Ed Visits

Background Despite investments to improve quality of emergency care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), few studies have described national, real‐world trends in AMI care in the emergency department (ED). We aimed to describe trends in the epidemiology and quality of AMI care in US EDs over a recent 11‐year period, from 2005 to 2015. Methods and Results We conducted an observational study of ED visits for AMI using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative probability sample of US EDs. AMI visits were classified as ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non‐STEMI. Outcomes included annual incidence of AMI, median ED length of stay, ED disposition type, and ED administration of evidence‐based medications. Annual ED visits for AMI decreased from 1 493 145 in 2005 to 581 924 in 2015. Estimated yearly incidence of ED visits for STEMI decreased from 1 402 768 to 315 813. The proportion of STEMI sent for immediate, same‐hospital catheterization increased from 12% to 37%. Among patients with STEMI sent directly for catheterization, median ED length of stay decreased from 62 to 37 minutes. ED administration of antithrombotic and nonaspirin antiplatelet agents rose for STEMI (23%–31% and 10%–27%, respectively). Conclusions National, real‐world trends in the epidemiology of AMI in the ED parallel those of clinical registries, with decreases in AMI incidence and STEMI proportion. ED care processes for STEMI mirror evolving guidelines that favor high‐intensity antiplatelet therapy, early invasive strategies, and regionalization of care.

Quality of Care in an Emergency Department from the Perspective of Traffic Injury Patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carin Franzén ◽  
Ulf Björnstig ◽  
Christine Bruhlin ◽  
Lilian Jansson ◽  
Hans Stenlund
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Traffic Injury

Piloting a Statewide Emergency Department Take‐Home Naloxone Program: Improving the Quality of Care for Patients at Risk of Opioid Overdose

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Dora‐Laskey ◽  
Joan Kellenberg ◽  
Chin Hwa Dahlem ◽  
Elizabeth English ◽  
Monica Gonzalez Walker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Patients At Risk

Use of medical emergency call data as a marker of quality of emergency department care in the post-National Emergency Access Target era

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 607
Author(s):  
Lorraine Westacott ◽  
Judy Graves ◽  
Mohsina Khatun ◽  
John Burke
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Emergency Admission ◽  
Emergency Call ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Model Of Care ◽  
Emergency Calls

Objectives Any new model of care should always be accompanied by rigorous monitoring to ensure that there are no negative consequences, especially any that impact upon patient safety. In 2013, ‘THERMoSTAT’ (Two- Hour Evaluation and Referral Model for Shorter Turnaround Times), an emergency department model of care developed by Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital staff was launched to gain efficiencies and improve hospital National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) compliance. The aim of this study was to trial the use of medical emergency call data as a novel marker of the quality of care delivered by our emergency department. Methods Incidence of medical emergency calls for hospital emergency admission patients for the 2 years pre- and 1 year post-THERMoSTAT were compared after standardising for overall hospital activity. Results During the study period, hospital activity increased 10%, and the emergency department experienced a total of 222 645 presentations, 68 000 (30.5%) of which converted into an admission. THERMoSTAT improved NEAT compliance by 17% (from 57.7% to 74.9%) with no change in any patient-safety indicators. A total of 8432 medical emergency calls were made on 5930 patients, 2831 of whom were emergency admissions. After adjusting for hospital activity, there was no change in the average number of patients per week who triggered a medical emergency call after the introduction of THERMoSTAT. These results were reproduced when data was analysed for: total number of inpatients triggering calls; emergency admission patients; and emergency admission patients within the first 24 h or first 4 h of admission. Conclusions This is the first report to investigate the correlation between inpatient medical emergency call incidence and emergency department model of care. Medical emergency call data showed significant promise as a measure of morbidity and as a more direct, objective, simple, quantitative and meaningful measure of patient safety. What is known about the topic? It is well established that extended emergency department lengths of stay are associated with poorer patient outcomes. The corollary of this is not always true however; shorter emergency department length of stay does not automatically translate into better care. Although the underlying philosophy of NEAT is to enhance patient care, there is a risk of negative consequences if NEAT is seen as an end in itself. Many of the commonly used emergency department key performance indicators focus on the timeliness of care and there is a scarcity of easily quantifiable markers that reliably reflect the quality of that care. What does this paper add? This study builds on the concept of medical emergency call incidence as a marker of safety and quality. It explores the utility of using the number of medical emergency calls made in the first few hours of an emergency admission as an indicator of the quality of care delivered by the emergency department. This is significant because it introduces a measure that has a focus that embraces more than the timeliness of care only. What are the implications for practitioners? If medical emergency call incidence in early emergency admissions can be proven to accurately reflect emergency department quality of care then it would provide an easily monitored, objective, quantitative and prompt measure that evaluates dimensions other than timeliness.

scholarly journals How to improve quality of care in overcrowded emergency departments? Development and evaluation of a virtual research environment. (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles-Henri Houze Cerfon ◽  
Christine Vaissié ◽  
Laurent Gout ◽  
Bruno Bastiani ◽  
Sandrine Charpentier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Simulated Patients ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Research Environment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ed Overcrowding ◽  
Virtual Research Environment

BACKGROUND Despite wide literature on ED overcrowding, scientific knowledge on emergency physicians’ cognitive processes coping with overcrowding is limited. OBJECTIVE We sought to develop and evaluate a virtual research environment that will allow us to study the effect of physicians’ strategies and behaviours on quality of care in the context of emergency department overcrowding. METHODS A simulation-based observational study was conducted over two stages: the development of a simulation model and its evaluation. A research environment in Emergency Medicine combining virtual reality and simulated patients has been designed and developed. Then, twelve emergency physicians took part in simulation scenarios and had to manage thirteen patients during a 2-hour period. The study outcome was the authenticity of the environment through realism, consistency and mastering. The realism was the resemblance perceived by the participants between virtual and real Emergency Department. The consistency of the scenario and the participants’ mastering of the environment was expected for 90% of the participants. RESULTS The virtual emergency department was considered realistic with no significant difference from the real world concerning facilities and resources except for the length of time of procedures that was perceived to be shorter. 100% of participants deemed that patient information, decision-making and managing patient flow were similar to real clinical practice. The virtual environment was well-mastered by all participants over the course of the scenarios. CONCLUSIONS The new simulation tool, Virtual Research Environment in Emergency Medicine has been successfully designed and developed. It has been assessed as perfectly authentic by emergency physicians compared to real EDs and thus offers another way to study human factors, quality of care and patient safety in the context of ED overcrowding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document