Responding to Major Burn Disasters in Resource-Limited Settings: Lessons Learned From an Oil Tanker Explosion in Nakuru, Kenya

2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 573-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eline van Kooij ◽  
Inge Schrever ◽  
Walter Kizito ◽  
Martine Hennaux ◽  
George Mugenya ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina M. Slusher ◽  
Andrew W. Kiragu ◽  
Louise T. Day ◽  
Ashley R. Bjorklund ◽  
Arianna Shirk ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S21-S22
Author(s):  
I Gutierrez Tobar ◽  
M Vázquez ◽  
B Happ ◽  
I Kopsidas ◽  
I Tinoco Martín ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Infectious in pediatric patients with cancer are common and can be life-threatening. Understanding risks for infections, mechanisms of progression, and diagnostic and therapeutic interventions is essential for quality care. Clinical guidance emerges frequently from high-income countries and dissemination of information using traditional methods takes time to reach resource-limited settings. By using case-based learning (CBL) strategies, we sought to expedite this process to improve practices worldwide. We report the implementation of a network-based platform for discussion of infections in the immunocompromised child in resource-limited settings and the potential for dynamic sharing of best care practices. Methods Using a virtual meeting platform, we established a weekly appointment and invited members of our regional networks, mainly comprising pediatricians with training / interest in infection care and prevention who care for children with cancer. We solicited cases for discussion by providing an electronic case submission form, a presentation template, a presentation checklist, and a protected health information reminder sheet. Materials were prepared in Spanish and English, launching initially in Spanish (October 2019), then expanding to English (September 2020) alternating between Spanish and English-led discussions. Based on the case of the week, a panel of experts, worldwide infectious disease experts, provided recommendations for care based on published evidence, standardized guidelines, and best practices. Detailed written summaries were captured and shared with case submitters. We recorded attendance and evaluated participant satisfaction and the use of discussed information. Additional CBL materials were developed post-launch to support and expand CBL beyond the live meeting sessions. Results From October 2019 to December 2020, we hosted 45 online meetings with clinical cases presented from 15 countries and 23 institutions across the globe. We have had a total of 1054 attendees, with an average of 28 participants per live meeting. Discussions included complications grouped by viral, fungal, and mycobacterial infection. A quarterly survey revealed that participants found the case discussions most beneficial for reviewing recent literature and learning practices from invited guest experts. Most respondents have very often or always adopted the recommendations discussed during online meetings for the management of patients locally. Additional materials include: a protected virtual community space for storing all CBL materials and promoting continued participant engagement; a growing index of infections with prepared PubMed searches for quick and easy navigation to peer-reviewed literature (n=9); and, written case summary reports, indexed by infection, made available to all audience members for reference (5=in draft, 12=published). During the first part of the COVID-19 pandemic, we incorporated a journal club structure to discuss emerging literature on the virus, and specifically the implications for children with / without cancer. Participants indicated that COVID-19 activities were extremely useful for discussing and digesting the rapidly evolving scientific literature for SARS-CoV-2 and being able to apply lessons learned in real-time. Conclusions A virtual platform for CBL provides a critical resource that expedites information-sharing and can potentially improve patient care by expanding access to expertise and experience for best care practices beyond geographic boundaries.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e32898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Kwasa ◽  
Deanna Cettomai ◽  
Edwin Lwanya ◽  
Dennis Osiemo ◽  
Patrick Oyaro ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e59906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Shanks ◽  
Derryck Klarkowski ◽  
Daniel P. O'Brien

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s395-s396
Author(s):  
Matthew Westercamp ◽  
Paul Malpiedi ◽  
Amber Vasquez ◽  
Danica Gomes ◽  
Carmen Hazim ◽  
...  

Background: Since 2015, the CDC has supported the development and implementation of healthcare-associated infection (HAI) surveillance in resource-limited settings through technical support of case definitions and methods that are feasible with existing surveillance capacity and integration with clinical care to maximize sustainability and data use for action. Methods: Surveillance initiatives included facility-level implementation programs in Kenya, Sierra Leone, Thailand, and Georgia; larger national or regional network-level projects in India and Vietnam were also supported. For assessment and planning, surveillance capacities were grouped into 3 domains: staff, informatics, and diagnostic capacities. Based on these capacities, simplified case definitions surveillance methodologies were devised to balance resources and effort with the anticipated value and use of findings. Results: There was broad understanding of the importance of HAI surveillance; however, the required resources and other challenges (eg, training, staffing, quality of available data) were underappreciated. Staff capacities were often influenced by a lack of dedicated surveillance staff and limited experience in systematic data collection and analysis. Informatics capacities were generally limited by the lack of digital data management, nonstandardized clinical data collection and storage, and the inability to assign and maintain unique patient identifiers. We found that capacity for diagnostics, a critical component of traditional HAI surveillance systems, was limited by its availability, frequency of use, and inconsistent rationale in clinical care. We found that successful surveillance strategies were generally simple, matched existing capacities, and targeted specific HAI priorities identified by clinical teams. For example, in Kenya and Sierra Leone, participating facilities established, with minimal external support, simplified SSI surveillance among post–caesarean-delivery patients. These initiatives improved integration of surveillance with clinical care through encouraging participation of the clinical team in surveillance and planning. Furthermore, these models directly linked surveillance activities to improved patient care (eg, combined clinical checklists with surveillance data collection forms). Discussion: In resource-limited settings, the local cost and effort required to establish and sustain the necessary infrastructure for HAI surveillance can be substantial. Establishing actionable and sustainable HAI surveillance can be achieved through simplifying HAI surveillance to match existing capacities and can result in valuable surveillance programs, even in very resource-limited settings.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document