scholarly journals Pressure Injury Prevention for Complex Cardiovascular Patients in the Operating Room and Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Pittman ◽  
Dawn Horvath ◽  
Terrie Beeson ◽  
Karrie Bailey ◽  
Annie Mills ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-255
Author(s):  
Gülzade Uysal ◽  
Duygu Sönmez Düzkaya ◽  
Tülay Yakut ◽  
Gülçin Bozkurt

The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a pressure injury prevention guide used in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) on the occurrence of pressure injuries. The design is a pre-post intervention with a control group and a prospective intervention group. Pressure injuries occurred on 9.4% of children in the nontreatment group, and in 3.6% of children in the treatment group. There was a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of pressure injuries between the nontreatment group and the treatment group ( p = .033). The average Braden Q pressure injury score was 12.20 ± 2.280 at the beginning of the intensive care hospitalization, and 13.73 ± 3.312 at discharge in the treatment group ( p < .001). The results show that the risk of pressure injuries was reduced and pressure injuries occurred later when an evidence-based pressure injury prevention guide was used.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 100102
Author(s):  
Jared A. Herman ◽  
Ivan Urits ◽  
Alan D. Kaye ◽  
Richard D. Urman ◽  
Omar Viswanath

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-71
Author(s):  
Cheryl Cruz

Practice Problem: Pressure injuries (PIs) are a significant healthcare problem globally. Adult patients in the intensive care setting are especially vulnerable to the development of PIs given the acuity of their diagnoses requiring extensive treatments, procedures and the use of multiple medical devices. PICOT: The PICOT question that guided this project was, “In adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients, how does the effect of implementing a pressure injury prevention bundle compare in patients who received the bundle, and patients receiving standard pressure injury prevention in reducing the incidence of pressure injuries after two months?” Evidence: Evidence exist that bundle implementation significantly reduced incidence of PIs in adult ICU patients. Intervention: A pressure injury preventive bundle consisting of six evidence-based interventions were consistently and collectively implemented to reduce incidence of PIs in adult ICU patients at a tertiary hospital in South Texas. Further, a multidisciplinary approach, monitoring, auditing, and providing constructive feedback to staff were employed to ensure appropriate implementation and increase likelihood of achieving positive outcomes. Outcome: Findings revealed a 7.37% reduction in incidence after two months of bundle implementation. Also, findings showed more than 90% compliance with five out of the six components of the bundle. Conclusion: The reduction in the incidence of PIs with the implementation of a pressure injury preventive bundle in adult ICU patients was not statistically significant. However, the reduction indicated a clinically meaningful improvement in pressure injury outcomes two months after implementing the bundle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document