On the degree of uncertainty which local attraction, if not allowed for, occasions in the map of a country, and in the mean figure of the earth as determined by geodesy ; a method of obtaining the mean figure free from ambiguity by a comparison of the Anglo-Gallic, Russian, and Indian Arcs ; and speculations on the constitution of the earth's crust
1. In former communications to the Royal Society I have shown that Local Attraction, owing to the amount it in some places attains, is a more troublesome element to deal with in geodetical operations than had generally been supposed. The Mountains and the Ocean were shown to combine to make the deviation of the plumb-line as much as 22".71, 17".23, 21".05, 34".16 (or quantities not differing materially from them) in the four principal stations of the Great Arc of India between Cape Comorin and the Himmalayas—viz. at Punnœ (8° 9' 31"), Damargida (18° 3' 15'), Kalianpur (24° 7' 11"), Kaliana (29° 30' 48") ; and how much these might be increased or lessened by the effect of variations of density in the crust below t was difficult to say. Deviations amounting to at least such quantities as 7''.61 and 7".87 were shown to exist in the stations of the Indian Arc, arising from this last cause (see Phil. Trans. 1861, p. 593 (4) and (5)). M. Otto Struve has lately called attention to similarly important deflections caused by local attraction in Russia—and especially to a remarkable difference of deflection at two stations near Moscow, only about eighteen miles apart, amounting to as much as 18", which is attributed to an invisible unknown cause in the strata below (see Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, April 1862).