scholarly journals Sexual selection is a form of social selection

2012 ◽  
Vol 367 (1600) ◽  
pp. 2266-2273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce E. Lyon ◽  
Robert Montgomerie
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Social Interactions ◽  
Social Selection ◽  
Reproductive Competition ◽  
Selection Theory ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Female Roles ◽  
Comprehensive Framework ◽  
Natural And Sexual Selection ◽  
Lines Of Evidence

Social selection influences the evolution of weapons, ornaments and behaviour in both males and females. Thus, social interactions in both sexual and non-sexual contexts can have a powerful influence on the evolution of traits that would otherwise appear to be detrimental to survival. Although clearly outlined by West-Eberhard in the early 1980s, the idea that social selection is a comprehensive framework for the study of ornaments and weapons has largely been ignored. In West-Eberhard's view, sexual selection is a form of social selection—a concept supported by several lines of evidence. Darwin's distinction between natural and sexual selection has been useful, but recent confusion about the limits of sexual selection suggests that some traits are not easily categorized as naturally or sexually selected. Because social selection theory has much to offer the current debates about both sexual selection and reproductive competition in females, it is sometimes viewed, narrowly, to be most useful when considering female roles. However, social selection theory encompasses much more than female reproductive competition. Our goal here was to provide that broader perspective.

4. Sex roles and stereotypes

2018 ◽  
pp. 52-68
Author(s):  
Leigh W. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Mate Choice ◽  
Sexual Behaviour ◽  
Sex Roles ◽  
Animal Species ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Mating Competition ◽  
Characteristic Behaviour ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Female Roles

‘Sex roles and stereotypes’ examines the notion, implicit in many of the original ideas about sexual selection, that males and females have natural ‘roles’ with characteristic behaviour associated with each sex. It also explores further the reasons behind deviations from the ‘typical’ sex roles in mate choice and in mating competition. Are there ‘standard’ male and female roles in both humans and other animal species? One version of sex roles holds that males are generally dominant and females submissive, stemming from the way that sexual selection favours different behaviours in each sex. This could mean that sexual selection dictates particular behaviours in males and females. But in fact, sexual behaviour is extraordinarily varied in nature.

scholarly journals Variation in Chin and Mandibular Symphysis Size and Shape in Males and Females: A CT-Based Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 4249
Author(s):  
Tatiana Sella Tunis ◽  
Israel Hershkovitz ◽  
Hila May ◽  
Alexander Dan Vardimon ◽  
Rachel Sarig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Anatomical Landmark ◽  
Anatomical Structure ◽  
Sexually Dimorphic ◽  
Selection Theory ◽  
Size And Shape ◽  
Size Index ◽  
Sexual Selection Theory ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Anthropological Literature

The chin is a unique anatomical landmark of modern humans. Its size and shape play an important role from the esthetic perspective. However, disagreement exists in the dental and anthropological literature regarding the sex differences in chin and symphysis morphometrics. The “sexual selection” theory is presented as a possible reason for chin formation in our species; however, many other contradictory theories also exist. This study’s aims were therefore to determine how chin and symphysis size and shape vary with sex, and to discuss “sexual selection” theory as a reason for its formation. Head and neck computed tomography (CT) scans of 419 adults were utilized to measure chin and symphysis sizes and shapes. The chin and symphysis measures were compared between the sexes using an independent-samples t-test, a Mann–Whitney test, and the F-statistic. The chin width was significantly greater in males than in females (p < 0.001), whereas the chin height, area, and size index were significantly greater in females (p < 0.001). Symphysis measures did not differ significantly between the sexes. Size accounted for 2–14% of the chin variance and between 24–33% of the symphysis variance. Overall, the chin was found to be a more heterogeneous anatomical structure than the symphysis, as well as more sexually dimorphic.

Differences in male and female cognitive abilities: Sexual selection or division of labor?

1996 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-255
Author(s):  
Michael T. Ghiselin
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Natural Selection ◽  
Sexual Dimorphism ◽  
Division Of Labor ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Reproductive Competition ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Males And Females

AbstractIn Darwinian terminology, “sexual selection” refers to purely reproductive competition and is conceptually distinct from natural selection as it affects reproduction generally. As natural selection may favor the evolution of sexual dimorphism by virtue of the division of labor between males and females, this possibility needs to be taken very seriously.

scholarly journals Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression?

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 249-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Archer
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Physical Aggression ◽  
Role Theory ◽  
Social Roles ◽  
Social Role ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Reproductive Competition ◽  
Threat Displays ◽  
Males And Females

AbstractI argue that the magnitude and nature of sex differences in aggression, their development, causation, and variability, can be better explained by sexual selection than by the alternative biosocial version of social role theory. Thus, sex differences in physical aggression increase with the degree of risk, occur early in life, peak in young adulthood, and are likely to be mediated by greater male impulsiveness, and greater female fear of physical danger. Male variability in physical aggression is consistent with an alternative life history perspective, and context-dependent variability with responses to reproductive competition, although some variability follows the internal and external influences of social roles. Other sex differences, in variance in reproductive output, threat displays, size and strength, maturation rates, and mortality and conception rates, all indicate that male aggression is part of a sexually selected adaptive complex. Physical aggression between partners can be explained using different evolutionary principles, arising from the conflicts of interest between males and females entering a reproductive alliance, combined with variability following differences in societal gender roles. In this case, social roles are particularly important since they enable both the relatively equality in physical aggression between partners from Western nations, and the considerable cross-national variability, to be explained.

scholarly journals Sexual selection in females across the animal tree of life

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salom&eacute Fromonteil ◽  
Lennart Winkler ◽  
Lucas Marie-Orleach ◽  
Tim Janicke
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sexual Reproduction ◽  
Tree Of Life ◽  
Selection Theory ◽  
Sexual Selection Theory ◽  
Males And Females

The pioneers of sexual selection theory proposed that males are generally "eager" whereas females are rather "coy" with respect to mating. This male-centred perspective on sexual selection continues to permeate our perception of sex differences across disciplines. Despite an increased awareness that females also compete for mating partners, we still tend to consider sexual selection in females a rare peculiarity. Here we present meta-analytic evidence from 72 species across a broad range of animal taxa to show that sexual selection in females is widespread and should be considered the norm rather than the exception. Thereby, our results extend our general understanding of sexual reproduction and may contribute to a more balanced perspective of how sexual selection operates in both males and females.

scholarly journals The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition

2012 ◽  
Vol 367 (1600) ◽  
pp. 2274-2293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Tobias ◽  
Robert Montgomerie ◽  
Bruce E. Lyon
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Social Selection ◽  
Ecological Resources ◽  
Female Ornaments ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Sexual Selection Theory ◽  
Mating Opportunities ◽  
History Of ◽  
Mate Acquisition ◽  
Males And Females

Ornaments, weapons and aggressive behaviours may evolve in female animals by mate choice and intrasexual competition for mating opportunities—the standard forms of sexual selection in males. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that selection tends to operate in different ways in males and females, with female traits more often mediating competition for ecological resources, rather than mate acquisition. Two main solutions have been proposed to accommodate this disparity. One is to expand the concept of sexual selection to include all mechanisms related to fecundity; another is to adopt an alternative conceptual framework—the theory of social selection—in which sexual selection is one component of a more general form of selection resulting from all social interactions. In this study, we summarize the history of the debate about female ornaments and weapons, and discuss potential resolutions. We review the components of fitness driving ornamentation in a wide range of systems, and show that selection often falls outside the limits of traditional sexual selection theory, particularly in females. We conclude that the evolution of these traits in both sexes is best understood within the unifying framework of social selection.

scholarly journals Are sex-biased genes more dispensable?

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith E. Mank ◽  
Hans Ellegren
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Molecular Evolution ◽  
Gene Expression Pattern ◽  
Selective Constraint ◽  
Sexually Dimorphic ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Natural And Sexual Selection ◽  
Rates Of Molecular Evolution

Many genes show different expression levels in males and females, and these form the basis of sexually dimorphic phenotypes. Sex-biased genes experience accelerated rates of protein evolution, which has been attributed to sexual selection. However, it is possible that the increased rates of molecular evolution, and more importantly the sex-biased gene expression pattern itself, are due to decreased selective constraint. This notion may explain many of the patterns associated with sex-biased gene expression, and changes how we should view the role of natural and sexual selection in relation to these genes.

scholarly journals Body size and climate as predictors of plumage colouration and sexual dichromatism in parrots

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisana Carballo ◽  
Kaspar Delhey ◽  
Mihai Valcu ◽  
Bart Kempenaers
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Social Interactions ◽  
Life Histories ◽  
Sexual Dichromatism ◽  
Cavity Nesting ◽  
Mutual Mate Choice ◽  
Parrot Species ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Nesting Habits

AbstractPsittaciformes (parrots, cockatoos and lorikeets) comprise one of the most colourful clades of birds. Their unique pigments and cavity nesting habits are two potential explanations for their colourful character. However, plumage colour varies substantially between parrot species and sometimes also between males and females of the same species. Here, we use comparative analyses to evaluate what factors correlate with colour elaboration, colour diversity and sexual dichromatism. Specifically, we test the association between different aspects of parrot colouration and (1) the intensity of sexual selection and social interactions, (2) variation along the slow-fast life-history continuum and (3) climatic variation. We show that larger species and species that live in warm environments display more elaborated colours, yet smaller species have higher levels of sexual dichromatism. Larger parrots tend to have darker and more blue and red colours. Parrots that live in humid environments are darker and redder, whilst species inhabiting warm regions have more blue plumage colours. In general, the variables we considered explain small to moderate amounts of variation in parrot colouration (up to 20%). Our data suggest that sexual selection may be acting more strongly on males in small, short-lived parrots leading to sexual dichromatism. More elaborate colouration in both males and females of the larger, long-lived species with slow tropical life-histories suggests that mutual mate choice and reduced selection for crypsis may be important in these species, as has been shown for passerines.

On the Measurement of Natural and Sexual Selection: Theory

Evolution ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stevan J. Arnold ◽  
Michael J. Wade
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Selection Theory ◽  
Sexual Selection Theory ◽  
Natural And Sexual Selection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document