scholarly journals Sex-chromosome evolution in frogs: what role for sex-antagonistic genes?

2021 ◽  
Vol 376 (1832) ◽  
pp. 20200094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Perrin
Keyword(s):  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Turnover Rate ◽  
Evolutionary Dynamics ◽  
Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Deleterious Mutations ◽  
Sex Chromosome Evolution ◽  
High Turnover ◽  
Y Chromosomes

Sex-antagonistic (SA) genes are widely considered to be crucial players in the evolution of sex chromosomes, being instrumental in the arrest of recombination and degeneration of Y chromosomes, as well as important drivers of sex-chromosome turnovers. To test such claims, one needs to focus on systems at the early stages of differentiation, ideally with a high turnover rate. Here, I review recent work on two families of amphibians, Ranidae (true frogs) and Hylidae (tree frogs), to show that results gathered so far from these groups provide no support for a significant role of SA genes in the evolutionary dynamics of their sex chromosomes. The findings support instead a central role for neutral processes and deleterious mutations. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Challenging the paradigm in sex chromosome evolution: empirical and theoretical insights with a focus on vertebrates (Part I)’.

scholarly journals Sex chromosome evolution: historical insights and future perspectives

2017 ◽  
Vol 284 (1854) ◽  
pp. 20162806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica K. Abbott ◽  
Anna K. Nordén ◽  
Bengt Hansson
Keyword(s):  
Sex Determination ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Analytical Models ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Sex Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Current Thinking

Many separate-sexed organisms have sex chromosomes controlling sex determination. Sex chromosomes often have reduced recombination, specialized (frequently sex-specific) gene content, dosage compensation and heteromorphic size. Research on sex determination and sex chromosome evolution has increased over the past decade and is today a very active field. However, some areas within the field have not received as much attention as others. We therefore believe that a historic overview of key findings and empirical discoveries will put current thinking into context and help us better understand where to go next. Here, we present a timeline of important conceptual and analytical models, as well as empirical studies that have advanced the field and changed our understanding of the evolution of sex chromosomes. Finally, we highlight gaps in our knowledge so far and propose some specific areas within the field that we recommend a greater focus on in the future, including the role of ecology in sex chromosome evolution and new multilocus models of sex chromosome divergence.

scholarly journals Sex chromosome evolution among amniotes: is the origin of sex chromosomes non-random?

2021 ◽  
Vol 376 (1833) ◽  
pp. 20200108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukáš Kratochvíl ◽  
Tony Gamble ◽  
Michail Rovatsos
Keyword(s):  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Divergent Evolution ◽  
Random Pattern ◽  
Sex Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Great Opportunity

Sex chromosomes are a great example of a convergent evolution at the genomic level, having evolved dozens of times just within amniotes. An intriguing question is whether this repeated evolution was random, or whether some ancestral syntenic blocks have significantly higher chance to be co-opted for the role of sex chromosomes owing to their gene content related to gonad development. Here, we summarize current knowledge on the evolutionary history of sex determination and sex chromosomes in amniotes and evaluate the hypothesis of non-random emergence of sex chromosomes. The current data on the origin of sex chromosomes in amniotes suggest that their evolution is indeed non-random. However, this non-random pattern is not very strong, and many syntenic blocks representing putatively independently evolved sex chromosomes are unique. Still, repeatedly co-opted chromosomes are an excellent model system, as independent co-option of the same genomic region for the role of sex chromosome offers a great opportunity for testing evolutionary scenarios on the sex chromosome evolution under the explicit control for the genomic background and gene identity. Future studies should use these systems more to explore the convergent/divergent evolution of sex chromosomes. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Challenging the paradigm in sex chromosome evolution: empirical and theoretical insights with a focus on vertebrates (Part II)’.

scholarly journals Meiosis reveals the early steps in the evolution of a neo-XY sex chromosome pair in the African pygmy mouse Mus minutoides

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Gil-Fernández ◽  
Paul A. Saunders ◽  
Marta Martín-Ruiz ◽  
Marta Ribagorda ◽  
Pablo López-Jiménez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Sex Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Chromosome Differentiation ◽  
Large Segment ◽  
Y Chromosomes ◽  
African Pygmy Mouse ◽  
Mus Minutoides

ABSTRACTSex chromosomes of eutherian mammals are highly different in size and gene content, and share only a small region of homology (pseudoautosomal region, PAR). They are thought to have evolved through an addition-attrition cycle involving the addition of autosomal segments to sex chromosomes and their subsequent differentiation. The events that drive this process are difficult to investigate because sex chromosomes in most mammals are at a very advanced stage of differentiation. Here, we have taken advantage of a recent translocation of an autosome to both sex chromosomes in the African pygmy mouse Mus minutoides, which has restored a large segment of homology (neo-PAR). By studying meiotic sex chromosome behavior and identifying fully sex-linked genetic markers in the neo-PAR, we demonstrate that this region shows unequivocal signs of early sex-differentiation. First, synapsis and resolution of DNA damage intermediates are delayed in the neo-PAR during meiosis. Second, recombination is suppressed in a large portion of the neo-PAR. However, the inactivation process that characterizes sex chromosomes during meiosis does not extend to this region. Finally, the sex chromosomes show a dual mechanism of association at metaphase-I that involves the formation of a chiasma in the neo-PAR and the preservation of an ancestral achiasmate mode of association in the non-homologous segments. We show that the study of meiosis is crucial to apprehend the onset of sex chromosome differentiation, as it introduces structural and functional constrains to sex chromosome evolution. Synapsis and DNA repair dynamics are the first processes affected in the incipient differentiation of X and Y chromosomes, and they may be involved in accelerating their evolution. This provides one of the very first reports of early steps in neo-sex chromosome differentiation in mammals, and for the first time a cellular framework for the addition-attrition model of sex chromosome evolution.AUTHOR SUMMARYThe early steps in the evolution of sex chromosomes are particularly difficult to study. Cessation of recombination around the sex-determining locus is thought to initiate the differentiation of sex chromosomes. Several studies have investigated this process from a genetic point of view. However, the cellular context in which recombination arrest occurs has not been considered as an important factor. In this report, we show that meiosis, the cellular division in which pairing and recombination between chromosomes takes place, can affect the incipient differentiation of X and Y chromosomes. Combining cytogenetic and genomic approaches, we found that in the African pygmy mouse Mus minutoides, which has recently undergone a sex chromosome-autosome fusion, synapsis and DNA repair dynamics are altered along the newly added region of the sex chromosomes, likely interfering with recombination and thus contributing to the genetic isolation of a large segment of the Y chromosome. Therefore, the cellular events that occur during meiosis are crucial to understand the very early stages of sex chromosome differentiation. This can help to explain why sex chromosomes evolve very fast in some organisms while in others they have barely changed for million years.

scholarly journals Y-chromosome haplotypes of varying differentiation to the X are not associated with male fitness in common frogs

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paris Veltsos ◽  
Nicolas Rodrigues ◽  
Tania Studer ◽  
Wen-Juan Ma ◽  
Roberto Sermier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Dimorphism ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Sex Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Chromosome Differentiation ◽  
Y Chromosomes ◽  
Male Phenotype ◽  
Xx Males

AbstractThe canonical model of sex-chromosome evolution assigns a key role to sexually antagonistic (SA) genes on the arrest of recombination and ensuing degeneration of Y chromosomes. This assumption cannot be tested in organisms with highly differentiated sex chromosomes, such as mammals or birds, owing to the lack of polymorphism. Fixation of SA alleles, furthermore, might be the consequence rather than the cause of recombination arrest. Here we focus on a population of common frogs (Rana temporaria) where XY males with genetically differentiated Y chromosomes (non-recombinant Y haplotypes) coexist with both XY° males with proto-Y chromosomes (only differentiated from X chromosomes in the immediate vicinity of the candidate sex-determining locus Dmrt1) and XX males with undifferentiated sex chromosomes (genetically identical to XX females). Our study shows no effect of sex-chromosome differentiation on male phenotype, mating success or fathering success. Our conclusions rejoin genomic studies that found no differences in gene expression between XY, XY° and XX males. Sexual dimorphism in common frogs seems to result from the differential expression of autosomal genes rather than sex-linked SA genes. Among-male variance in sex-chromosome differentiation is better explained by a polymorphism in the penetrance of alleles at the sex locus, resulting in variable levels of sex reversal (and thus of X-Y recombination in XY females), independent of sex-linked SA genes.Impact SummaryHumans, like other mammals, present highly differentiated sex chromosomes, with a large, gene-rich X chromosome contrasting with a small, gene-poor Y chromosome. This differentiation results from a process that started approximately 160 Mya, when the Y first stopped recombining with the X. How and why this happened, however, remain controversial. According to the canonical model, the process was initiated by sexually antagonistic selection; namely, selection on the proto-Y chromosome for alleles that were beneficial to males but detrimental to females. The arrest of XY recombination then allowed such alleles to be only transmitted to sons, not to daughters. Although appealing and elegant, this model can no longer be tested in mammals, as it requires a sex-chromosome system at an incipient stage of evolution. Here we focus on a frog that displays within-population polymorphism is sex-chromosome differentiation, where XY males with differentiated chromosomes coexist with XX males lacking Y chromosomes. We find no effect of sex-chromosome differentiation on male phenotype or mating success, opposing expectations from the standard model. Sex linked genes do not seem to have a disproportionate effect on sexual dimorphism. From our results, sexually antagonistic genes show no association with sex-chromosome differentiation in frogs, which calls for alternative models of sex-chromosome evolution.

scholarly journals The effects of haploid selection on Y chromosome evolution in two closely related dioecious plants

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Sandler ◽  
Felix E.G. Beaudry ◽  
Spencer C.H. Barrett ◽  
Stephen I. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Sex Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Y Chromosomes ◽  
Expression Bias ◽  
Haploid Selection ◽  
Plant Sex

AbstractThe evolution of sex chromosomes is usually considered to be driven by sexually antagonistic selection in the diploid phase. However, selection during the haploid gametic phase of the lifecycle has recently received theoretical attention as possibly playing a central role in sex chromosome evolution, especially in plants where gene expression in the haploid phase is extensive. In particular, male-specific haploid selection might favour the linkage of pollen beneficial alleles to male sex determining regions on incipient Y chromosomes. This linkage might then allow such alleles to further specialise for the haploid phase. Purifying haploid selection is also expected to slow the degeneration of Y-linked genes expressed in the haploid phase. Here, we examine the evolution of gene expression in flower buds and pollen of two species of Rumex to test for signatures of haploid selection acting during plant sex chromosome evolution. We find that genes with high ancestral pollen expression bias occur more often on sex chromosomes than autosomes and that genes on the Y chromosome are more likely to become enriched for pollen expression bias. We also find that genes with low expression in pollen are more likely to be lost from the Y chromosome. Our results suggest that sex-specific haploid selection during the gametophytic stage of the lifecycle may be a major contributor to several features of plant sex chromosome evolution.

scholarly journals Sequence Differentiation Associated With an Inversion on the Neo-X Chromosome of Drosophila americana

Genetics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 165 (3) ◽  
pp. 1317-1328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryant F McAllister
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Geographic Region ◽  
Sex Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Sequence Analyses ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Y Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosomal Pair

Abstract Sex chromosomes originate from pairs of autosomes that acquire controlling genes in the sex-determining cascade. Universal mechanisms apparently influence the evolution of sex chromosomes, because this chromosomal pair is characteristically heteromorphic in a broad range of organisms. To examine the pattern of initial differentiation between sex chromosomes, sequence analyses were performed on a pair of newly formed sex chromosomes in Drosophila americana. This species has neo-sex chromosomes as a result of a centromeric fusion between the X chromosome and an autosome. Sequences were analyzed from the Alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh), big brain (bib), and timeless (tim) gene regions, which represent separate positions along this pair of neo-sex chromosomes. In the northwestern range of the species, the bib and Adh regions exhibit significant sequence differentiation for neo-X chromosomes relative to neo-Y chromosomes from the same geographic region and other chromosomal populations of D. americana. Furthermore, a nucleotide site defining a common haplotype in bib is shown to be associated with a paracentric inversion [In(4)ab] on the neo-X chromosome, and this inversion suppresses recombination between neo-X and neo-Y chromosomes. These observations are consistent with the inversion acting as a recombination modifier that suppresses exchange between these neo-sex chromosomes, as predicted by models of sex chromosome evolution.

scholarly journals Preexisting heterogeneities in gene dosage sensitivity shaped sex chromosome evolution in mammals and birds

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahin Naqvi ◽  
Daniel W. Bellott ◽  
David C. Page
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Mirna Target ◽  
Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Gene Dosage ◽  
Sex Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Y Chromosomes ◽  
Target Sites ◽  
Autosomal Pair

Mammalian X and Y chromosomes evolved from an ordinary autosomal pair; genetic decay decimated the Y, which in turn necessitated X chromosome inactivation (XCI). Genes of the ancestral autosomes are often assumed to have undertaken these transitions on uniform terms, but we hypothesized that they varied in their dosage constraints. We inferred such constraints from conservation of microRNA (miRNA)-mediated repression, validated by analysis of experimental data. X-linked genes with a surviving Y homolog have the most conserved miRNA target sites, followed by genes with no Y homolog and subject to XCI, and then genes with no Y homolog but escaping XCI; this heterogeneity existed on the ancestral autosomes. Similar results for avian Z-linked genes, with or without a W homolog, lead to a model of XY/ZW evolution incorporating preexisting dosage sensitivities of individual genes in determining their evolutionary fates, and ultimately shaping the mammalian and avian sex chromosomes.

scholarly journals Sex determination in the fly Megaselia scalaris, a model system for primary steps of sex chromosome evolution.

Genetics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 1097-1104
Author(s):  
W Traut
Keyword(s):  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosome Pair ◽  
Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Random Amplified Polymorphic Dna ◽  
Sex Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Y Chromosomes ◽  
Megaselia Scalaris ◽  
Primary Male

Abstract The fly Megaselia scalaris Loew possesses three homomorphic chromosome pairs; 2 is the sex chromosome pair in two wild-type laboratory stocks of different geographic origin (designated "original" sex chromosome pair in this paper). The primary male-determining function moves at a very low rate to other chromosomes, thereby creating new Y chromosomes. Random amplified polymorphic DNA markers obtained by polymerase chain reaction with single decamer primers and a few available phenotypic markers were used in testcrosses to localize the sex-determining loci and to define the new sex chromosomes. Four cases are presented in which the primary male-determining function had been transferred from the original Y chromosome to a new locus either on one of the autosomes or on the original X chromosome, presumably by transposition. In these cases, the sex-determining function had moved to a different locus without an obvious cotransfer of other Y chromosome markers. Thus, with Megaselia we are afforded an experimental system to study the otherwise hypothetical primary stages of sex chromosome evolution. An initial molecular differentiation is apparent even in the new sex chromosomes. Molecular differences between the original X and Y chromosomes illustrate a slightly more advanced stage of sex chromosome evolution.

scholarly journals Genetic sex determination and sex-specific lifespan in tetrapods – evidence of a toxic Y effect

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahida Sultanova ◽  
Philip A. Downing ◽  
Pau Carazo
Keyword(s):  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Alternative Hypothesis ◽  
Z Chromosome ◽  
W Chromosome ◽  
Deleterious Mutations ◽  
Recessive Mutations ◽  
Y Chromosomes ◽  
Heterogametic Sex ◽  
Taxonomic Patterns

ABSTRACTSex-specific lifespans are ubiquitous across the tree of life and exhibit broad taxonomic patterns that remain a puzzle, such as males living longer than females in birds and vice versa in mammals. The prevailing “unguarded-X” hypothesis (UXh) explains this by differential expression of recessive mutations in the X/Z chromosome of the heterogametic sex (e.g., females in birds and males in mammals), but has only received indirect support to date. An alternative hypothesis is that the accumulation of deleterious mutations and repetitive elements on the Y/W chromosome might lower the survival of the heterogametic sex (“toxic Y” hypothesis). Here, we report lower survival of the heterogametic relative to the homogametic sex across 138 species of birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians, as expected if sex chromosomes shape sex-specific lifespans. We then analysed bird and mammal karyotypes and found that the relative sizes of the X and Z chromosomes are not associated with sex-specific lifespans, contrary to UXh predictions. In contrast, we found that Y size correlates negatively with male survival in mammals, where toxic Y effects are expected to be particularly strong. This suggests that small Y chromosomes benefit male lifespans. Our results confirm the role of sex chromosomes in explaining sex differences in lifespan, but indicate that, at least in mammals, this is better explained by “toxic Y” rather than UXh effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document