scholarly journals The genus name Methanothrix Huser et al. 1983 and the species combination Methanothrix soehngenii Huser et al. 1983 do not contravene Rule 31a and are not to be considered as rejected names, the genus name Methanosaeta Patel and Sprott 1990 refers to the same taxon as Methanothrix soehngenii Huser et al. 1983 and the species combination Methanothrix thermophila Kamagata et al. 1992 is rejected: Supplementary information to Opinion 75. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (Pt_10) ◽  
pp. 3597-3598 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Tindall
Keyword(s):  
Type Species ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Species Combination ◽  
Rejected Names

The Judicial Commission affirms that the genus name Methanothrix Huser et al. 1983 and the species combination Methanothrix soehngenii Huser et al. 1983 do not contravene Rule 31a and are not to be considered as rejected names. The genus name Methanosaeta Patel and Sprott 1990 applies to the same taxon as Methanothrix Huser et al. 1983 and is therefore a later heterotypic synonym. The combinations Methanothrix thermoacetophila corrig. Nozhevnikova and Chudina 1988 and Methanothrix thermophila Kamagata et al. 1992 are considered to refer to the same taxon, a consequence of which is that Methanothrix thermophila Kamagata et al. 1992 contravenes Rule 51b and is placed on the List of Rejected Names.

scholarly journals The status of the species Bacillus aerophilus and Bacillus stratosphericus. Request for an Opinion

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (Pt_3) ◽  
pp. 1101-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Branquinho ◽  
Günter Klein ◽  
Peter Kämpfer ◽  
Luísa V. Peixe
Keyword(s):  
Type Species ◽  
Bacillus Pumilus ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Culture Collection ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
The Status ◽  
Type Strains ◽  
Rejected Names

During a study assessing the diversity of the Bacillus pumilus group it became apparent that the type strains of both Bacillus aerophilus and Bacillus stratosphericus were not available from any established culture collection, nor from the authors who originally described them. Therefore, type strains of these species cannot be included in any further scientific studies. It is therefore proposed that the Judicial Commission of the International Committee of Systematics of Prokaryotes place the names Bacillus aerophilus and Bacillus stratosphericus on the list of rejected names, if suitable replacements for the type strains are not found or if neotype strains are not proposed within two years following the publication of this Request for an Opinion.

scholarly journals Opinions 100, 101 and 102

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (9) ◽  
pp. 5177-5181 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Arahal
Keyword(s):  
Type Strain ◽  
Type Species ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Type Material ◽  
Strain Atcc ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Nomenclatural Type ◽  
Link Type

The International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes has formally made final decisions, taking into account the conclusions of the Judicial Commission, on three pending Requests for an Opinion, thereby allowing the corresponding Opinions to be issued. According to Opinion 100, the request for the recognition of strain A1-86 (=DSM 17629=NCIMB 14373) as the neotype strain of Eubacterium rectale (Hauduroy et al. 1937) Prévot 1938 (Approved Lists 1980) is denied, ruling that a neotype does not need to be designated for E. rectale because strain VPI 0990 (=ATCC 33656=CIP 105953) is considered to be a duplicate isolate of the same strain as VPI 0989 (=ATCC 25578) and may serve as its nomenclatural type. Opinion 101 approves the request that strain ATCC 25946 (=DSM 14877) serves as the type strain of Melittangium lichenicola instead of strain ATCC 25944, formally correcting the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Opinion 102 concludes that strain Cc m8 (=DSM 14697=CIP 109128=JCM 12621) is an established neotype strain for the species Myxococcus macrosporus , replacing the designated type strain Windsor M271, and that strain Mx s8 (=DSM 14675=JCM 12634) is an established neotype strain for the species Myxococcus stipitatus , replacing the designated type strain Windsor M78, with some additional considerations about the nature of the type material replaced and about the name Corallococcus ( Myxococcus ) macrosporus.

scholarly journals The designated type strain of Pseudomonas halophila Fendrich 1989 is DSM 3051, the designated type strain of Halovibrio variabilis Fendrich 1989 is DSM 3050, the new name Halomonas utahensis ( Fendrich 1989 ) Sorokin and Tindall 2006 is created for the species represented by DSM 3051 when treated as a member of the genus Halomonas, the combination Halomonas variabilis ( Fendrich 1989 ) Dobson and Franzmann 1996 is rejected, and the combination Halovibrio denitrificans Sorokin et al. 2006 is validly published with an emendation of the description of the genus Halovibrio Fendrich 1989 emend. Sorokin et al. 2006. Opinion 93. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (Pt_10) ◽  
pp. 3588-3589 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Tindall
Keyword(s):  
Type Strain ◽  
Type Species ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Content Type ◽  
New Name ◽  
Link Type

The Judicial Commission affirms that, according to information presented to it, the designated type strain of Pseudomonas halophila Fendrich 1989 is DSM 3051 (replacing DSM 3050) and the designated type strain of Halovibrio variabilis Fendrich 1989 is DSM 3050 (replacing DSM 3051). A new name, Halomonas utahensis (Fendrich 1989) Sorokin and Tindall 2006 nom. nov., is created for the species represented by DSM 3051 when treated as a member of the genus Halomonas , because the combination Halomonas halophila (Quesada et al. 1984) Dobson and Franzmann 1996 has priority based on the fact that the epithet halophila in the combination Halomonas halophila (Quesada et al. 1984) Dobson and Franzmann 1996 (basoynm Deleya halophila Quesada et al. 1984) has priority over the epithet halophila should the taxon Pseudomonas halophila Fendrich 1989 be treated as a member of the genus Halomonas . The combination Halomonas variabilis (Fendrich 1989) Dobson and Franzmann 1996 is rejected. The combination Halovibrio denitrificans Sorokin et al. 2006 is validly published with an emendation of the description of the genus Halovibrio Fendrich 1989 emend. Sorokin et al. 2006.

scholarly journals The subgenus names Moraxella and Branhamella (in the genus Moraxella) are not in accordance with the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and are therefore not validly published: Supplementary information to Opinion 83. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (Pt_10) ◽  
pp. 3595-3596 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Tindall
Keyword(s):  
International Committee ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
International Code ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Code Of Nomenclature ◽  
International Code Of Nomenclature

The publication of Opinion 83, which dealt with the valid publication of the subgenus names Moraxella and Branhamella (in the genus Moraxella ), has highlighted a problem relating to the absence of descriptions associated with these names at the time they were effectively published. This calls into question whether the ruling outlined in Opinion 83, that these names should have qualified for inclusion on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names, and their inclusion on Validation List 15 are not in accordance with Rule 27 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria governing the valid publication of a name. The subgenus names Moraxella and Branhamella (in the genus Moraxella ) are not to be considered to be included on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names, nor are they to be considered to be validly published by inclusion on Validation List 15.

scholarly journals ATCC 43642 replaces ATCC 23581 as the type strain of Leptospira interrogans (Stimson 1907) Wenyon 1926. Opinion 91. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (Pt_10) ◽  
pp. 3584-3585 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Tindall
Keyword(s):  
Type Strain ◽  
Type Species ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Leptospira Interrogans ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type

The Judicial Commission affirms that, according to information presented to it, the type strain of Leptospira interrogans (Stimson 1907) Wenyon 1926 designated on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names (ATCC 23581) has been shown not to represent an authentic culture of strain RGA (a member of the serovar Icterohaemorrhagiae) and ATCC 43642, derived from an authentic strain of strain RGA, a member of the serovar Icterohaemorrhagiae, is designated the type strain of Leptospira interrogans (Stimson 1907) Wenyon 1926.

scholarly journals The status of the species Hyphomonas rosenbergii Weiner et al. 2000. Request for an Opinion

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (Pt_1) ◽  
pp. 321-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiliang Lai ◽  
Chongping Li ◽  
Zongze Shao
Keyword(s):  
Type Strain ◽  
Type Species ◽  
Gene Sequence ◽  
Culture Collection ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Gene Sequence Analysis ◽  
The Status ◽  
Rejected Names

On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and several key phenotypic features, it was ascertained that the culture cited as the type strain of the species Hyphomonas rosenbergii , ATCC 43869T, does not conform to the description of the species, [Weiner, R. M., Melick, M., O’Neill, K. & Quintero, E. (2000). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 459–469]. The type strain does not exist in any other established culture collection or with the authors who described this species. Therefore, it cannot be included in any scientific study. It is proposed that the Judicial Commission place the name Hyphomonas rosenbergii on the list of rejected names if a suitable replacement type strain is not found or a neotype is not proposed within two years following the publication of this Request for an Opinion.

scholarly journals The status of the genus Prolinoborus (Pot et al. 1992) and the species Prolinoborus fasciculus (Pot et al. 1992)

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (9) ◽  
pp. 5165-5171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie P. Glaeser ◽  
Dipen Pulami ◽  
Jochen Blom ◽  
Tobias Eisenberg ◽  
Alexander Goesmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
16S Rrna ◽  
16S Rrna Gene ◽  
Type Species ◽  
Sequence Similarity ◽  
Phylogenetic Analyses ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Culture Collections ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Rejected Names

On the basis of two other publications (Yarza et al. 2013; Nemec et al. 2019) and on the basis of resequencing of the 16S rRNA gene of Prolinoborus fasciculus CIP 103579T it is concluded that Prolinoborus fasciculus CIP 103579T, which is the only available strain of the species from culture collections, does not conform to the original description given by Pot et al. (1992). The strain investigated is a member of the genus Acinetobacter within the Moraxellaceae , a family of the Gammaproteobacteria and not a member of the Betaproteobacteria as originally proposed. Prolinoborus fasciculus CIP 103579T shared 99.8 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity with Acinetobacter lwoffii DSM 2403T. The two strains clustered together by rpoB- and core genome-based phylogenetic analyses and shared an average nucleotide identity of 96.47% (reciprocal, 96.56 %) and a digital genome distance calculation (GGDC) value of 66.9 %. Furthermore, the two strains shared matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight MS profiles to a high extent and showed highly similar cellular fatty acid profiles and physiological substrate utilization patterns. It is proposed that the Judicial commission consider (1) that the strain currently deposited as CIP 103579 be recognized as a member of Acinetobacter lwoffii ; (2) placing Prolinoborus fasciculus (Pot et al. 1992) on the list of rejected names if a suitable replacement strain, or a neotype strain cannot be found within 2 years of publication of this request; and (3) place the genus name Prolinoborus (Pot et al. 1992) on the list of rejected names [Recommendation 20D (3) of the Code].

scholarly journals The combination Enterobacter agglomerans is to be cited as Enterobacter agglomerans (Beijerinck 1888) Ewing and Fife 1972 and the combination Pantoea agglomerans is to be cited as Pantoea agglomerans (Beijerinck 1888) Gavini et al. 1989. Opinion 90. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (Pt_10) ◽  
pp. 3582-3583 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Tindall
Keyword(s):  
Type Species ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Pantoea Agglomerans ◽  
Enterobacter Agglomerans ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type

The Judicial Commission affirms that, according to information presented to it, the combination Enterobacter agglomerans is to be cited as Enterobacter agglomerans (Beijerinck 1888) Ewing and Fife 1972 and the combination Pantoea agglomerans is to be cited as Pantoea agglomerans (Beijerinck 1888) Gavini et al. 1989.

scholarly journals The status of the name Lactobacillus rogosae Holdeman and Moore 1974. Opinion 88.Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (Pt_10) ◽  
pp. 3578-3579 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Tindall
Keyword(s):  
Type Strain ◽  
Type Species ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Strain Atcc ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
The Status

The Judicial Commission affirms that the combination Lactobacillus rogosae Holdeman and Moore 1974 represented by the type strain ATCC 27753 listed on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names does not appear to be currently represented by an extant type strain. Further work is needed to determine whether a derivative of the original type can be found or whether a neotype can be designated.

scholarly journals The epithet aurantiaca in Micromonospora aurantiaca Sveshnikova et al. 1969 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate and requires a replacement epithet. Opinion 89. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (Pt_10) ◽  
pp. 3580-3581 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Tindall
Keyword(s):  
Type Species ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Specific Epithet ◽  
Different Types

The Judicial Commission affirms that the combination Micromonospora aurantiaca Sveshnikova et al. 1969 (Approved Lists 1980) may not serve as the correct name of the taxon because Rule 12b states that no specific or subspecific epithets within the same genus may be the same if based on different types and the specific epithet aurantiaca in Micromonospora aurantiaca Sveshnikova et al. 1969 (Approved Lists 1980) is the same as the subspecific epithet aurantiaca in Micromonospora carbonacea subsp. aurantiaca Luedemann and Brodsky 1964 (Approved Lists 1980) and the latter has priority. According to Rule 53, the duplication of the same specific or subspecific epithet based on different types creates an illegitimate epithet with the principle of priority determining which is to be replaced as specified in Rule 54. The replacement of the specific epithet aurantiaca in Micromonospora aurantiaca Sveshnikova et al. 1969 (Approved Lists 1980) also requires that the authorship of the original authors is retained. However, action of this nature requires that the original epithet is maintained in the original combination. There currently appears to be no mechanisms where such action can be taken.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document