scholarly journals The Diagnosis and Treatment of Infantile Nystagmus Syndrome (INS)

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1385-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangeeta Khanna ◽  
Louis F. Dell'Osso

The successful treatment of infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS) depends primarily on accurate and repeatable diagnosis of the type(s) of nystagmus present as well as their variation with gaze and convergence angles or fixating eye. Research over the past 40 years has demonstrated that the only way to achieve both is by making and analyzing ocular motility recordings. Determination of the direct effects of peripheral and central INS therapies can only be made by pre- and post-therapy comparisons of the nystagmus characteristics, specifically of the quality of the foveation periods within each cycle. If one is only interested in cosmetic improvements, diminution of the nystagmus amplitude is all that need be measured. However, if improvement of visual function is the primary goal of therapy, then measurement of the pre- and post-therapy foveation quality must be made, both in primary position and over a broad range of gaze angles. The use of the eXpanded Nystagmus Acuity Function (NAFX) on nystagmus data yields both an accurate measure of foveation quality and a prediction of maximum potential acuity for the patient's waveform. When used with the patient's measured, pre-therapy visual acuity, the NAFX demonstrates the amount of visual acuity loss that is due to sensory abnormalities, demonstrates the amount due to the nystagmus waveform, and estimates the measured post-therapy acuity for all values of improved NAFX and gaze angles measured. The ability to predict visual acuity improvement was not possible before the use of the NAFX. The failure to incorporate accurate measures of nystagmus waveform and foveation quality into their diagnostic evaluation continues to deprive patients of the best possible standard of care and results in mistaken diagnoses as well as inappropriate and, in some cases, unneeded multiple surgeries.

2018 ◽  
Vol 235 (04) ◽  
pp. 416-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Voide ◽  
Nicole Hoeckele ◽  
Pierre-François Kaeser

Abstract Background The Spot Vision Screener (SVS) is designed to detect significant ametropia, anisometropia, and strabismus in non-dilated eyes. This study evaluates the efficacy of the SVS in paediatric visual screening. Patients and Methods All children screened during the paediatric visual screening day in Lausanne in 2016 were evaluated with the SVS, conventional monocular autorefractors, and clinical orthoptic examination. Recommendations for a further eye examination of the SVS were compared with those issued from traditional clinical screenings (monocular refraction and orthoptic examination). Results One hundred and sixty-eight consecutive children were included. The median age was 3.9 years. The SVS median spherical equivalent (SE) was + 0.25 D OU and it detected seven cases of (4.2%) anisometropia (SE difference ≥ 1 D). The conventional monocular autorefractor median SE was − 0.13 D OU and 20 cases of anisometropia (11.9%) were detected. Refraction could not be measured in 1.2% of patients with SVS versus 17.2% with monocular refractors. The SVS screened two manifest strabismus cases against five manifest and > 100 latent strabismus with orthoptic examination. As expected, the SVS was unable to assess reactions to monocular occlusion, visual acuity, and stereovision as well as to detect ocular motility disorders without strabismus in the primary position, and missed two cases of abnormal Brückner reflexes. Overall, the SVS identified 66 suspect patients (39.3%) against 102 (60.7%) after complete clinical examination. Conclusions The SVS can be a useful objective screening tool for non-ophthalmologists. However, because it fails to detect ocular motility troubles, organic visual acuity loss, or to assess the visual potential, it should only be used in association with a clinical examination, even in routine screening procedures.


2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 760-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher James Doig ◽  
David A. Zygun

“I think there’s a big strong belief in [...] the community … and maybe it’s in the world at large that somehow the doctors are more concerned about harvesting the organs than what’s best for the patient.”1 In the past 45 years, organ and tissue recovery and transplantation have moved from the occasional and experimental to a standard of care for end-stage organ failure; receiving an organ transplant is for many the only opportunity for increased quantity and/or quality of life. The increasing prevalence of diseases such as viral hepatitis, diabetes, and hypertension has significantly increased the incidence of end-organ failure. Additionally, surgical advances have permitted less stringent qualification criteria, so that people of advanced age or patients who may be in a physiologically fragile state are now eligible to be organ recipients. These changes have created a significant demand for organs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-270
Author(s):  
Ruaridh Weaterton ◽  
Shinn Tan ◽  
John Adam ◽  
Harneet Kaur ◽  
Katherine Rennie ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Gonder ◽  
Valery M. Walker ◽  
Martin Barbeau ◽  
Nancy Zaour ◽  
Bryan H. Zachau ◽  
...  

Purpose. To characterize the economic and quality of life burden of diabetic macular edema (DME) in Canadian patients.Patients and Methods. 145 patients with DME were followed for 6 months with monthly telephone interviews and medical chart reviews at months 0, 3, and 6. Visual acuity in the worst-seeing eye was assessed at months 0 and 6. DME-related healthcare costs were determined over 6 months, and vision-related (National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire) and generic (EQ-5D) quality of life was assessed at months 0, 3, and 6.Results. Mean age of patients was 63.7 years: 52% were male and 72% had bilateral DME. At baseline, visual acuity was categorized as normal/mild loss for 63.4% of patients, moderate loss for 10.4%, and severe loss/nearly blind for 26.2%. Mean 6-month DME-related costs/patient were as follows: all patients (n=135), $2,092; normal/mild loss (n=88), $1,776; moderate loss (n=13), $1,845; and severe loss/nearly blind (n=34), $3,007. Composite scores for vision-related quality of life declined with increasing visual acuity loss; generic quality of life scores were highest for moderate loss and lowest for severe loss/nearly blind.Conclusions. DME-related costs in the Canadian healthcare system are substantial. Costs increased and vision-related quality of life declined with increasing visual acuity severity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1217.2-1217
Author(s):  
I. Hernandez ◽  
L. Abasolo ◽  
B. Fernandez ◽  
A. Madrid García ◽  
J. Font ◽  
...  

Background:Uveitis are characterized by inflammation of the middle layer of the eye wall. In developed countries uveitis are the second major treatable cause of blindness in those 20–65 years of age. Additionally, more than 50% of the subjects affected with these conditions will develop complications related to the uveitis, and more than 30% will suffer visual impairment. As a result, these conditions are associated with an important burden. The assessment of the patient’s quality of life (QoL) through standardized and validated questionnaires allows us to evaluate objectively the burden of the disease. Several studies have shown that the QoL of uveitis patients is reduced when compared with that of general population. Moreover, several socio-demographic and clinical related characteristics have been associated with impaired QoL. However, no longitudinal analysis of the vision-related (VR) QoL in clinical practice has been carried out.Objectives:To describe VR-QoL in non-infectious uveitis (NIU) patients during a follow-up period of two years. Furthermore, to analyse the influence of socio-demographic, clinical and treatment factors on the progression of VR-QoL.Methods:Longitudinal prospective study which includes patients examined in a multidisciplinary tertiary uveitis clinic, with a diagnosis of NIU. In each of these patients a yearly determination of VR-QoL was carried out following the VFQ-25 questionnaire, finally including all those who had completed at least an initial questionnaire and a second one after two years of follow-up. Analysis of risk factors at baseline in repeated VFQ-25 measurements was carried out by generalized estimating equations (GEE) models. Variables related to demographic, clinical and treatment factors with a determination of p-value <0.15 were included in multivariable models, which were then compared using theQuasi Akaike Information Criteria(qAIC). A local Ethics Committee approved the execution of this project.Results:128 patients were included, 117 of which also had an evaluation after the first year of follow-up. 55.5% were female with a median age of 34 years at the start of symptoms and of 37 years at the moment of attending our clinic for the first time. First evaluation of VR-QoL was determined a median (p25-p75) of 6.1 (1.8-13.1) years after that first visit. The most frequent locations of NIU were anterior (41.1%), panuveitis (27.4%), posterior (16.1%) and intermediate (15.3%). At our first evaluation, 27.3% of patients were receiving treatment with topical steroids, 22.3% oral, 49.2% immunosuppressant drugs (both synthetic and/or biological) and 19.05% biological therapies. The median (p25-p75) VFG25 determinations at baseline, first and second years of follow-up were 0.87 (0.78-0.93), 0.88 (0.80-0.93) y 0.89 (0.81-0.94), with no significant differences (first year vs. Baseline p = 0.54; 2 years vs. Baseline p = 0.61).In the GEE multivariable models the presence at baseline of permanent incapacity due to NIU, concomitant thyroid disease, worse visual acuity, unilateral pattern, cataracts, retinal vasculitis, epiretinal membrane and use of azathioprine were independently associated with a worse VR-QoL (Table 1).Table 1.Risk factors related to VR-QoL in patients with NIUVariablesCoef. (IC 95%)p-valueVisual acuity23.6 (12.3 - 34.8)<0.01Permanent incapacity-24.8 (-33.7 - -15.9)<0.01Unilateral NIU-2.9 (-5.7 - -0.006)0.05Cataracts-5.2 (-10 - -0.3)0.037Vasculitis-13.3 (-23.4 - -3.1)0.011Epiretinal membrane-6.8 (-12.7 - -0.8)0.026Azathioprine-7.5 (-14.7 - -0.3)0.041Conclusion:During these two years of follow-up, no significant changes have taken place regarding VR-QoL in patients with NIU assessed at a tertiary centre. Other than visual acuity at baseline, certain ocular manifestations and clinical comorbidities have also been shown to have an independent effect on the VR-QoL of these patients.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 149-154
Author(s):  
Alexandra Doina Boangiu ◽  
◽  
Gabriela Mihailescu ◽  

Visual acuity loss can be due to eye ball diseases or to lesions of the optic nerves, visual pathway or cortical projection of vision. The differential diagnosis can be challenging and though patients go first to the ophthalmologist, there is not always the ophthalmologist who can diagnose and treat the patient. For a great number of causes/diseases, a neurologist should also see the patient, even if there is a transient or persistent monocular or binocular visual acuity loss a disturbance of the visual field or of the perception of colours. Visual acuity loss can be more than this. It can be a symptom or a sign of a neurological or systemic disease and a rapid diagnosis and specific treatment are mandatory in order to treat the symptoms and improve the patient’s quality of life.


2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 1404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria L. N. Fu ◽  
Richard A. Bilonick ◽  
Joost Felius ◽  
Richard W. Hertle ◽  
Eileen E. Birch

2005 ◽  
Vol 139 (4) ◽  
pp. 716-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongsheng Yang ◽  
Richard W. Hertle ◽  
Vanessa M. Hill ◽  
Deana J. Stevens

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document