scholarly journals Traumatic Urethral Injury without Pelvic Fracture in an Adult Female

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 308-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan A. Bockholt ◽  
Kenneth G. Nepple ◽  
Charles R. Powell ◽  
Karl J. Kreder

A 23-year-old female was involved in a motor vehicle collision with multiple injuries, including a right acetabular fracture, but no pelvic fracture. Urology consultation was obtained due to difficulty placing a urethral catheter. Examination revealed a longitudinal urethral tear with vaginal laceration extending 2 cm from the urethral meatus proximally toward the bladder neck. The longitudinal urethral tear was repaired primarily. Traumatic female urethral injury in the absence of a pelvic fracture is an exceedingly rare occurrence.

2017 ◽  
Vol 197 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pankaj Joshi ◽  
Devang Desai ◽  
Sandesh Surana ◽  
Hazem Orabi ◽  
Craig Hunter ◽  
...  

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 179-183
Author(s):  
Hafiz Al Asad ◽  
Nahid Rahman Zico ◽  
AKM Shahadat Hossain ◽  
Zulfia Zinat Chowhury ◽  
Md Mostafizur Rahman ◽  
...  

Background: Dhaka Medical College Hospital is the highest referral center for PFUI. As anstomotic urethroplasty is a challenging surgery and most of the surgeons refer these type of injuries to our center, we performed this study to evaluate the outcome of our cases. Objective: This study aims to find the outcome and complications of perineal end to end anastomotic urethroplasty in the management of posterior urethral injury resulting from pelvic fracture. Materials and Methods: We performed 147 perineal bulbo-prostatic anastomotic urethroplasty for PFUIs from January, 2013 to May, 2019. Mean age was 37 years with majority between 21 to 50 years (>85%). Nine patients had history of failed anastomotic urethroplasty. After surgical intervention patients were discharged with a supra-pubic catheter (SPC) and per urethral catheter in situ. On 22nd POD urethral catheter was removed and SPC on the next day if patient can void normally. 1st and 2nd follow up done on of 3rd and 6th month respectively following surgery. If patient voided well and Qmax>15ml/ sec; repair was defined as successful. Results: Success rate of anastomotic urethroplasty for PFUI was 93.87%. Total 9 procedures were failed including 2 urethro-cutaneous fistula and needed re-do anastomosis. Erectile dysfunction (ED) was present in 18 patients before operation and after surgery 12 more patients developed ED and total number was 30 during first follow up, which reduced to 24 during second follow-up. Two patient developed incontinence which improved in subsequent follow-up. Conclusion: Anastomotic urethroplasty remains the gold standard in the management of PFUI. Erectile dysfunction is the main issue to be concerned and need special attention. KYAMC Journal Vol. 10, No.-4, January 2020, Page 179-183


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. e231166
Author(s):  
Devanshu Bansal ◽  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Siddharth Jain ◽  
Prem Nath Dogra

Iatrogenic creation of false tract in posterior urethra while managing a case of pelvic fracture urethral injury is a dreadful complication. The spectrum of presentation ranges from complete urinary incontinence to urinary retention. We describe three such cases created due to railroading or attempted repair. Case 1 presented with total urinary incontinence following open perineal urethroplasty for posterior urethral trauma while two cases presented with failure to void after endoscopic or open surgical management for the same. One patient was managed with endoscopic resection of the septum between the false passage and true posterior urethra; two cases required redo urethroplasty. All patients voided well postoperatively and were continent. Surgeon experience and meticulous endoscopic evaluation are the keys to success. Forceful attempt at per urethral catheter placement in the acute setting should be avoided. Blind railroading of the catheter and unnecessarily forceful passage of suprapubic metal bougie during urethroplasty should be condemned.


2015 ◽  
Vol 193 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Hunter ◽  
Walid Shahrour ◽  
Pankaj Joshi ◽  
Sandesh Surana ◽  
Vikram shah Batra ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-7
Author(s):  
Charles N. Brooks ◽  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract Multiple factors determine the likelihood, type, and severity of bodily injury following a motor vehicle collision and, in turn, influence the need for treatment, extent of disability, and likelihood of permanent impairment. Among the most important factors is the change in velocity due to an impact (Δv). Other factors include the individual's strength and elasticity, body position at the time of impact, awareness of the impending impact (ie, opportunity to brace, guard, or contract muscles before an impact), and effects of braking. Because Δv is the area under the acceleration vs time curve, it combines force and duration and is a useful way to quantify impact severity. The article includes a table showing the results of a literature review that concluded, “the consensus of human subject research conducted to date is that a single exposure to a rear-end impact with a Δv of 5 mph or less is unlikely to result in injury” in most healthy, restrained occupants. Because velocity incorporates direction as well as speed, a vehicular occupant is less likely to be injured in a rear impact than when struck from the side. Evaluators must consider multiple factors, including the occupant's pre-existing physical and psychosocial status, the mechanism and magnitude of the collision, and a variety of biomechanical variables. Recommendations based solely on patient history and physical findings (and, perhaps, imaging studies) may be ill-informed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 105956
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Swain ◽  
Gerald McGwin ◽  
Joanne M. Wood ◽  
Cynthia Owsley

Injury ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pora Kuperman ◽  
Yelena Granovsky ◽  
Shiri Fadel ◽  
Noam Bosak ◽  
Chen Buxbaum ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document