scholarly journals Structural basis for terminal loop recognition and processing of pri-miRNA-18a by hnRNP A1

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamed Kooshapur ◽  
Nila Roy Choudhury ◽  
Bernd Simon ◽  
Max Mühlbauer ◽  
Alexander Jussupow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Mirna Biogenesis ◽  
Rna Recognition ◽  
Hnrnp A1 ◽  
Sequence Motifs ◽  
Terminal Loop ◽  
Recognition Motifs

Post-transcriptional mechanisms play a predominant role in the control of microRNA (miRNA) production. Recognition of the terminal loop of precursor miRNAs by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) influences their processing; however, the mechanistic and structural basis for how levels of individual or subsets of miRNAs are regulated is mostly unexplored. We previously described a role for hnRNP A1, an RBP implicated in many aspects of RNA processing, as an auxiliary factor that promotes the Microprocessor-mediated processing of pri-mir-18a. Here, we reveal the mechanistic basis for this stimulatory role of hnRNP A1 by combining integrative structural biology with biochemical and functional assays. We demonstrate that hnRNP A1 forms a 1:1 complex with pri-mir-18a that involves binding of both RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) to cognate RNA sequence motifs in the conserved terminal loop of pri-mir-18a. Terminal loop binding induces an allosteric destabilization of base-pairing in the pri-mir-18a stem that promotes its down-stream processing. Our results highlight terminal loop RNA recognition by RNA-binding proteins as a general principle of miRNA biogenesis and regulation.

scholarly journals RNA recognition motifs of disease-linked RNA-binding proteins contribute to amyloid formation

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sashank Agrawal ◽  
Pan-Hsien Kuo ◽  
Lee-Ya Chu ◽  
Bagher Golzarroshan ◽  
Monika Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Amyloid Formation ◽  
Rna Recognition ◽  
Rna Recognition Motifs ◽  
Recognition Motifs

scholarly journals RNA recognition motifs involved in nuclear import of RNA-binding proteins

RNA Biology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Cassola ◽  
Griselda Noé ◽  
Alberto C. Frasch
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Recognition ◽  
Rna Recognition Motifs ◽  
Recognition Motifs

Control of mRNA degradation in trypanosomes

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 520-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Clayton ◽  
Angela Schwede ◽  
Mhairi Stewart ◽  
Ana Robles ◽  
Corinna Benz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rna Interference ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Mrna Degradation ◽  
Rna Recognition ◽  
Rna Recognition Motifs ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Recognition Motifs

Control of gene expression in trypanosomes relies almost exclusively on post-transcriptional mechanisms. Trypanosomes have the normal enzymes for mRNA decay: both the exosome and a 5′–3′-exoribonuclease are important in the degradation of very unstable transcripts, whereas the CAF1/NOT complex plays a major role in the degradation of all mRNAs tested. Targeted RNA interference screening was used to identify RNA-binding proteins that regulate mRNA degradation, and it revealed roles for proteins with RNA recognition motifs or pumilio domains.

hnRNP A1 Selectively Interacts Through its Gly-rich Domain with Different RNA-binding Proteins

1996 ◽  
Vol 259 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Cartegni ◽  
Mariacaterina Maconi ◽  
Elena Morandi ◽  
Fabio Cobianchi ◽  
Silvano Riva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Hnrnp A1 ◽  
Rich Domain

Domain necessary for Drosophila ELAV nuclear localization: function requires nuclear ELAV

1999 ◽  
Vol 112 (24) ◽  
pp. 4501-4512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.M. Yannoni ◽  
K. White
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Nuclear Localization Sequence ◽  
Rna Recognition ◽  
Rna Recognition Motifs ◽  
Mutant Proteins ◽  
Localization Sequence ◽  
Recognition Motifs

The neuron specific Drosophila ELAV protein belongs to the ELAV family of RNA binding proteins which are characterized by three highly conserved RNA recognition motifs, an N-terminal domain, and a hinge region between the second and third RNA recognition motifs. Despite their highly conserved RNA recognition motifs the ELAV family members are a group of proteins with diverse posttranscriptional functions including splicing regulation, mRNA stability and translatability and have a variety of subcellular localizations. The role of the ELAV hinge in localization and function was examined using transgenes encoding ELAV hinge deletions, in vivo. Subcellular localization of the hinge mutant proteins revealed that residues between amino acids 333–374 are necessary for nuclear localization. This delineated sequence has no significant homology to classical nuclear localization sequences, but it is similar to the recently characterized nucleocytoplasmic shuttling sequence, the HNS, from a human ELAV family member, HuR. This defined sequence, however, was insufficient for nuclear localization as tested using hinge-GFP fusion proteins. Functional assays revealed that mutant proteins that fail to localize to the nucleus are unable to provide ELAV vital function, but their function is significantly restored when translocated into the nucleus by a heterologous nuclear localization sequence tag.

scholarly journals A unique ribonucleoprotein complex assembles preferentially on ecdysone-responsive sites in Drosophila melanogaster.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 5323-5330 ◽  
Author(s):  
S A Amero ◽  
M J Matunis ◽  
E L Matunis ◽  
J W Hockensmith ◽  
G Raychaudhuri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Polytene Chromosomes ◽  
Cell Extract ◽  
Sequence Motifs ◽  
Drosophila Cell ◽  
Rnase Digestion

The protein on ecdysone puffs (PEP) is associated preferentially with active ecdysone-inducible puffs on Drosophila polytene chromosomes and contains sequence motifs characteristic of transcription factors and RNA-binding proteins (S. A. Amero, S. C. R. Elgin, and A. L. Beyer, Genes Dev. 5:188-200, 1991). PEP is associated with RNA in vivo, as demonstrated here by the sensitivity of PEP-specific chromosomal immunostaining in situ to RNase digestion and by the immunopurification of PEP in Drosophila cell extract with heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) complexes. As revealed by sequential immunostaining, PEP is found on a subset of chromosomal sites bound by the HRB (heterogeneous nuclear RNA-binding) proteins, which are basic Drosophila hnRNPs. These observations lead us to suggest that a unique, PEP-containing hnRNP complex assembles preferentially on the transcripts of ecdysone-regulated genes in Drosophila melanogaster presumably to expedite the transcription and/or processing of these transcripts.

scholarly journals The structural basis for RNA selectivity by the IMP family of RNA-binding proteins

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeetayu Biswas ◽  
Vivek L. Patel ◽  
Varun Bhaskar ◽  
Jeffrey A. Chao ◽  
Robert H. Singer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Development ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Stability ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Variable Loops

Abstract The IGF2 mRNA-binding proteins (ZBP1/IMP1, IMP2, IMP3) are highly conserved post-transcriptional regulators of RNA stability, localization and translation. They play important roles in cell migration, neural development, metabolism and cancer cell survival. The knockout phenotypes of individual IMP proteins suggest that each family member regulates a unique pool of RNAs, yet evidence and an underlying mechanism for this is lacking. Here, we combine systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) and NMR spectroscopy to demonstrate that the major RNA-binding domains of the two most distantly related IMPs (ZBP1 and IMP2) bind to different consensus sequences and regulate targets consistent with their knockout phenotypes and roles in disease. We find that the targeting specificity of each IMP is determined by few amino acids in their variable loops. As variable loops often differ amongst KH domain paralogs, we hypothesize that this is a general mechanism for evolving specificity and regulation of the transcriptome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document