scholarly journals Evaluation of Serological SARS-CoV-2 Lateral Flow Assays for Rapid Point of Care Testing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven E Conklin ◽  
Kathryn Martin ◽  
Yukari C Manabe ◽  
Haley A Schmidt ◽  
Morgan Keruly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Specific Antibodies ◽  
Testing Performance ◽  
Lateral Flow Assays ◽  
Point Of Care Tests

Background. Rapid point-of-care tests (POCTs) for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies vary in performance. A critical need exists to perform head-to-head comparison of these assays. Methods. Performance of fifteen different lateral flow POCTs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies was performed on a well characterized set of 100 samples. Of these, 40 samples from known SARS-CoV-2-infected, convalescent individuals (average of 45 days post symptom onset) were used to assess sensitivity. Sixty samples from the pre-pandemic era (negative control), that were known to have been infected with other respiratory viruses (rhinoviruses A, B, C and/or coronavirus 229E, HKU1, NL63 OC43) were used to assess specificity. The timing of seroconversion was assessed on five POCTs on a panel of 272 longitudinal samples from 47 patients of known time since symptom onset. Results. For the assays that were evaluated, the sensitivity and specificity for any reactive band ranged from 55%-97% and 78%-100%, respectively. When assessing the performance of the IgM and the IgG bands alone, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0%-88% and 80%-100% for IgM and 25%-95% and 90%-100% for IgG. Longitudinal testing revealed that median time post symptom onset to a positive result was 7 days (IQR 5.4, 9.8) for IgM and 8.2 days (IQR 6.3 to 11.3). Conclusion. The testing performance varied widely among POCTs with most variation related to the sensitivity of the assays. The IgM band was most likely to misclassify pre-pandemic samples. The appearance of IgM and IgG bands occurred almost simultaneously.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Serological SARS-CoV-2 Lateral Flow Assays for Rapid Point of Care Testing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven E. Conklin ◽  
Kathryn Martin ◽  
Yukari C Manabe ◽  
Haley A Schmidt ◽  
Jernelle Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Specific Antibodies ◽  
Testing Performance ◽  
Lateral Flow Assays ◽  
Point Of Care Tests

Background. Rapid point-of-care tests (POCTs) for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies vary in performance. A critical need exists to perform head-to-head comparison of these assays. Methods. Performance of fifteen different lateral flow POCTs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies was performed on a well characterized set of 100 samples. Of these, 40 samples from known SARS-CoV-2-infected, convalescent individuals (average of 45 days post symptom onset) were used to assess sensitivity. Sixty samples from the pre-pandemic era (negative control), that were known to have been infected with other respiratory viruses (rhinoviruses A, B, C and/or coronavirus 229E, HKU1, NL63 OC43) were used to assess specificity. The timing of seroconversion was assessed on five LFAs on a panel of 272 longitudinal samples from 47 patients of known time since symptom onset. Results. For the assays that were evaluated, the sensitivity and specificity for any reactive band ranged from 55%-97% and 78%-100%, respectively. When assessing the performance of the IgM and the IgG bands alone, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0%-88% and 80%-100% for IgM and 25%-95% and 90%-100% for IgG. Longitudinal testing revealed that median time post symptom onset to a positive result was 7 days (IQR 5.4, 9.8) for IgM and 8.2 days (IQR 6.3 to 11.3) for IgG. Conclusion. The testing performance varied widely among LFAs with most variation related to the sensitivity of the assays. The IgM band was most likely to misclassify pre-pandemic samples. The appearance of IgM and IgG bands occurred almost simultaneously.

scholarly journals Application of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification combined with colorimetric and lateral flow dipstick visualization as the potential point-of-care testing for diphtheria

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Anna Zasada ◽  
Aldona Wiatrzyk ◽  
Urszula Czajka ◽  
Klaudia Brodzik ◽  
Kamila Formińska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Detection Limit ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Lamp Assay ◽  
Corynebacterium Diphtheriae ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Suspected Case ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification

Abstract Background Diphtheria outbreaks occurred in endemic areas and imported and indigenous cases are reported in UE/EEA. Because of the high infectiveness and severity of the disease, early and accurate diagnosis of each suspected case is essential for the treatment and management of the case and close contacts. The aim of the study was to establish simple and rapid testing methods based on Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) assay for the detection of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and differentiation between toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains.Methods Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans isolates from the National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene collection were used for the development of LAMP assay for the diagnosis of diphtheria and nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae infections. Various colorimetric methods for visualization of results were investigated. Sensitivity and specificity of the assay were examined using a collection of DNA samples from various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.Results The LAMP assay for tox and dtxR genes was developed. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay were calculated as 100%. The detection limit was estimated as 1.42 pg/µl concentration of DNA template when the reaction was conducted for 60 min. However, the detection limit was lowered 10 times for every 10 minutes of reduction in the time of incubation during the reaction. Positive results were successfully detected colorimetrically using hydroxynaphthol blue, calcein, QuantiFluor, and lateral flow Milenia HybriDetect dipsticks.Conclusion The assay developed in the study might be applied for point-of-care testing of diphtheria and other C. diphtheriae infections. It is highly sensitive, specific, inexpensive, easy to use, and suitable for low-resource settings.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Six Commercial Mid- to High-Volume Antibody and Six Point-of-Care Lateral Flow Assays for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen L. Charlton ◽  
Jamil N. Kanji ◽  
Kam Johal ◽  
Ashley Bailey ◽  
Sabrina S. Plitt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Acute Infection ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Respiratory Viruses ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Deep Blue ◽  
Lateral Flow Assays

ABSTRACT Coronavirus disease (COVID) serological tests are essential to determine the overall seroprevalence of a population and to facilitate exposure estimates within that population. We performed a head-to-head assessment of enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and point-of-care lateral flow assays (POCTs) to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies. Demographics, symptoms, comorbidities, treatment, and mortality of patients whose sera were used were also reviewed. Six EIAs (Abbott, Affinity, Bio-Rad, DiaSorin, Euroimmun, and Roche) and six POCTs (BTNX, Biolidics, Deep Blue, Genrui, Getein BioTech, and Innovita) were evaluated for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in known COVID-19-infected individuals. Sensitivity of EIAs ranged from 50 to 100%, with only four assays having overall sensitivities of >95% after 21 days after symptom onset. Notably, cross-reactivity with other respiratory viruses (parainfluenza virus [PIV-4] [n = 5], human metapneumovirus [hMPV] [n = 3], rhinovirus/enterovirus [n = 1], CoV-229E [n = 2], CoV-NL63 [n = 2], and CoV-OC43 [n = 2]) was observed; however, overall specificity of EIAs was good (92 to 100%; all but one assay had specificity above 95%). POCTs were 0 to 100% sensitive >21 days after onset, with specificity ranging from 96 to 100%. However, many POCTs had faint banding and were often difficult to interpret. Serology assays can detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies as early as 10 days after symptom onset. Serology assays vary in their sensitivity based on the marker (IgA/IgM versus IgG versus total) and by manufacturer; however, overall only 4 EIAs and 4 POCTs had sensitivities of >95% >21 days after symptom onset. Cross-reactivity with other seasonal coronaviruses is of concern. Serology assays should not be used for the diagnosis of acute infection but rather in carefully designed serosurveys to facilitate understanding of seroprevalence in a population and to identify previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

scholarly journals Application of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification combined with colorimetric and lateral flow dipstick visualization as the potential point-of-care testing for Corynebacterium diphtheriae

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Anna Zasada ◽  
Aldona Wiatrzyk ◽  
Urszula Czajka ◽  
Klaudia Brodzik ◽  
Kamila Formińska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Detection Limit ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Lamp Assay ◽  
Corynebacterium Diphtheriae ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Suspected Case ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification

Abstract Background Diphtheria outbreaks occurred in endemic areas and imported and indigenous cases are reported in UE/EEA. Because of the high infectiveness and severity of the disease, early and accurate diagnosis of each suspected case is essential for the treatment and management of the case and close contacts.The aim of the study was to establish simple and rapid testing methods based on Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) assay for the detection of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and differentiation between toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains.Methods Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans isolates from the National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene collection were used for the development of LAMP assay for the diagnosis of diphtheria and nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae infections. Various colorimetric methods for visualization of results were investigated. Sensitivity and specificity of the assay were examined using a collection of DNA samples from various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.Results The LAMP assay for tox and dtxR genes was developed. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay were calculated as 100%. The detection limit was estimated as 1.42 pg/µl concentration of DNA template when the reaction was conducted for 60 min. However, the detection limit was lowered 10 times for every 10 minutes of reduction in the time of incubation during the reaction. Positive results were successfully detected colorimetrically using hydroxynaphthol blue, calcein, QuantiFluor, and lateral flow Milenia HybriDetect dipsticks.Conclusion The assay developed in the study might be applied for point-of-care testing of diphtheria and other C. diphtheriae infections as well as for other infections caused by diphtheria-toxin producing Corynebacterium species. It is highly sensitive, specific, inexpensive, easy to use, and suitable for low-resource settings.

scholarly journals Application of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification combined with colorimetric and lateral flow dipstick visualization as the potential point-of-care testing for Corynebacterium diphtheriae

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Anna Zasada ◽  
Aldona Wiatrzyk ◽  
Urszula Czajka ◽  
Klaudia Brodzik ◽  
Kamila Formińska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Detection Limit ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Lamp Assay ◽  
Corynebacterium Diphtheriae ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Suspected Case ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification

Abstract Background Diphtheria outbreaks occurred in endemic areas and imported and indigenous cases are reported in UE/EEA. Because of the high infectiveness and severity of the disease, early and accurate diagnosis of each suspected case is essential for the treatment and management of the case and close contacts. The aim of the study was to establish simple and rapid testing methods based on Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) assay for the detection of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and differentiation between toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains. Methods Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans isolates from the National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene collection were used for the development of LAMP assay for the diagnosis of diphtheria and nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae infections. Various colorimetric methods for visualization of results were investigated. Sensitivity and specificity of the assay were examined using a collection of DNA samples from various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Results The LAMP assay for tox and dtxR genes was developed. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay were calculated as 100%. The detection limit was estimated as 1.42 pg/µl concentration of DNA template when the reaction was conducted for 60 min. However, the detection limit was lowered 10 times for every 10 minutes of reduction in the time of incubation during the reaction. Positive results were successfully detected colorimetrically using hydroxynaphthol blue, calcein, QuantiFluor, and lateral flow Milenia HybriDetect dipsticks. Conclusion The assay developed in the study might be applied for point-of-care testing of diphtheria and other C. diphtheriae infections as well as for other infections caused by diphtheria-toxin producing Corynebacterium species. It is highly sensitive, specific, inexpensive, easy to use, and suitable for low-resource settings.

scholarly journals Application of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification combined with colorimetric and lateral flow dipstick visualization as the potential point-of-care testing for Corynebacterium diphtheriae

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Anna Zasada ◽  
Aldona Wiatrzyk ◽  
Urszula Czajka ◽  
Klaudia Brodzik ◽  
Kamila Formińska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Detection Limit ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Lamp Assay ◽  
Corynebacterium Diphtheriae ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Suspected Case ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification

Abstract Background Diphtheria outbreaks occurred in endemic areas and imported and indigenous cases are reported in UE/EEA. Because of the high infectiveness and severity of the disease, early and accurate diagnosis of each suspected case is essential for the treatment and management of the case and close contacts. The aim of the study was to establish simple and rapid testing methods based on Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) assay for the detection of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and differentiation between toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains. Methods Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans isolates from the National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene collection were used for the development of LAMP assay for the diagnosis of diphtheria and nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae infections. Various colorimetric methods for visualization of results were investigated. Sensitivity and specificity of the assay were examined using a collection of DNA samples from various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Results The LAMP assay for tox and dtxR genes was developed. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay were calculated as 100%. The detection limit was estimated as 1.42 pg/µl concentration of DNA template when the reaction was conducted for 60 min. However, the detection limit was lowered 10 times for every 10 minutes of reduction in the time of incubation during the reaction. Positive results were successfully detected colorimetrically using hydroxynaphthol blue, calcein, QuantiFluor, and lateral flow Milenia HybriDetect dipsticks. Conclusion The assay developed in the study might be applied for point-of-care testing of diphtheria and other C. diphtheriae infections as well as for other infections caused by diphtheria-toxin producing Corynebacterium species. It is highly sensitive, specific, inexpensive, easy to use, and suitable for low-resource settings.

Recent advancements in structural improvements of lateral flow assays towards point-of-care testing

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 13-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tohid Mahmoudi ◽  
Miguel de la Guardia ◽  
Behnaz Shirdel ◽  
Ahad Mokhtarzadeh ◽  
Behzad Baradaran
Keyword(s):  
Point Of Care ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Lateral Flow Assays

scholarly journals Application of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification combined with colorimetric and lateral flow dipstick visualization as the potential point-of-care testing for Corynebacterium diphtheriae

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Anna Zasada ◽  
Aldona Wiatrzyk ◽  
Urszula Czajka ◽  
Klaudia Brodzik ◽  
Kamila Formińska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Detection Limit ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Lamp Assay ◽  
Corynebacterium Diphtheriae ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Suspected Case ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification

Abstract Background: Diphtheria outbreaks occurred in endemic areas and imported and indigenous cases are reported in UE/EEA. Because of the high infectiveness and severity of the disease, early and accurate diagnosis of each suspected case is essential for the treatment and management of the case and close contacts.The aim of the study was to establish simple and rapid testing methods based on Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) assay for the detection of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and differentiation between toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains.Methods: Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans isolates from the National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene collection were used for the development of LAMP assay for the diagnosis of diphtheria and nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae infections. Various colorimetric methods for visualization of results were investigated. Sensitivity and specificity of the assay were examined using a collection of DNA samples from various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.Results: The LAMP assay for tox and dtxR genes was developed. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay were calculated as 100%. The detection limit was estimated as 1.42 pg/µl concentration of DNA template when the reaction was conducted for 60 min. However, the detection limit was lowered 10 times for every 10 minutes of reduction in the time of incubation during the reaction. Positive results were successfully detected colorimetrically using hydroxynaphthol blue, calcein, QuantiFluor, and lateral flow Milenia HybriDetect dipsticks.Conclusion: The assay developed in the study might be applied for point-of-care testing of diphtheria and other C. diphtheriae infections as well as for other infections caused by diphtheria-toxin producing Corynebacterium species. It is highly sensitive, specific, inexpensive, easy to use, and suitable for low-resource settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document