scholarly journals Hemodynamic changes in response to excitatory and inhibitory modulations by transcranial magnetic stimulation at the human sensorimotor cortex

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Ju Lee ◽  
Mikko Nyrhinen ◽  
Risto J. Ilmoniemi ◽  
Fa-Hsuan Lin
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Images ◽  
Sensorimotor Network ◽  
Fmri Signal ◽  
Signal Changes ◽  
Neurophysiological Basis

AbstractTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can non-invasively induce both excitatory and inhibitory neuronal activity. However, the neurophysiological basis for both kinds of modulation remains elusive. In this study, with a controlled dosage over the 30-s interval, we elicited excitatory and inhibitory TMS modulations over the human primary motor cortex (M1) with TMS bursts of high (10-Hz and 30-Hz) and low frequency (0.5-Hz), respectively, and took functional magnetic resonance images (fMRI). Excitatory and inhibitory modulations were evidenced by changes in motor evoked potentials (MEP). Significantly increased fMRI signal at M1 was only detected under excitatory high-frequency TMS but not during inhibitory low-frequency TMS. The supplementary motor area (SMA) had significant fMRI signal changes after both excitatory and inhibitory TMS. The topology of the activated M1 and SMA matched the activated sensorimotor network during voluntary movement. The precuneus was selectively activated with bursts of five TMS pulses. These findings demonstrated the asymmetric hemodynamic responses to excitatory and inhibitory TMS modulations with region-dependent relationships between the local fMRI signal changes and TMS dosage over different time scales.

Influence of different transcranial magnetic stimulation current directions on the corticomotor control of lumbar erector spinae muscles during a static task

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikaël Desmons ◽  
Antoine Rohel ◽  
Amélie Desgagnés ◽  
Catherine Mercier ◽  
Hugo Massé-Alarie
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Erector Spinae ◽  
Recruitment Curve ◽  
Axial Muscles ◽  
Active Motor ◽  
Stimulation Current ◽  
Cortical Representations

Different directions of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can activate different neuronal circuits. While posteroanterior current (PA-TMS) depolarizes mainly interneurons in primary motor cortex (M1), an anteroposterior current (AP-TMS) has been suggested to activate different M1 circuits and perhaps axons from the premotor regions. Although M1 is also involved in the control of axial muscles, no study has explored if different current directions activate different M1 circuits that may have distinct functional role. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of different current directions (PA- and AP-TMS) on the corticomotor control and spatial cortical organisation of the lumbar erector spinae muscle (LES). Thirthy-four healthy participants were recruited for two independent experiments and LES motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded. In experiment 1 (n=17), active motor threshold (AMT), MEP latencies, recruitment curve (90 to 160% AMT), excitatory and inhibitory intracortical mechanisms using paired-pulse TMS (80% followed by 120% AMT stimuli at 2-3-10 and 15ms inter-stimulus intervals) were tested using a double cone (n=12) and a figure-of-eight (n=5) coils. In experiment 2 (n=17), LES cortical representations were tested using PA- and AP-TMS. AMT was higher for AP- compared to PA-TMS (p=0.002). Longer latencies with AP-TMS were compared to PA-TMS (p=0.017). AP-TMS produced more inhibition compared to PA-TMS at 2ms and 3ms (p=0.010), but no difference was observed for longer intervals. No difference was found for recruitment curve and mapping. Those findings suggest that each PA- and AP-TMS may activate different cortical circuits controlling low back muscles as proposed for hand muscles.

High-intensity, low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances excitability of the human corticospinal pathway

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 1969-1978
Author(s):  
Jessica M. D’Amico ◽  
Siobhan C. Dongés ◽  
Janet L. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Corticospinal Tract ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Corticospinal Pathway ◽  
Plastic Changes

In this study, we present a novel, intensity-dependent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol that induces lasting, plastic changes within the corticospinal tract. High-intensity rTMS at a frequency of 0.1 Hz induces facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) lasting at least 35 min. Additionally, these changes are not limited only to small MEPs but occur throughout the recruitment curve. Finally, facilitation of MEPs following high-intensity rTMS does not appear to be due to changes in intracortical inhibition or facilitation.

scholarly journals Changes in corticospinal excitability during reach adaptation in force fields

2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry ◽  
Mohammad Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh ◽  
Michelle D. Harran ◽  
Yousef Salimpour ◽  
Reza Shadmehr
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Neural Basis ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Gradual Group ◽  
Specific Increase ◽  
Stimulation Of

Both abrupt and gradually imposed perturbations produce adaptive changes in motor output, but the neural basis of adaptation may be distinct. Here, we measured the state of the primary motor cortex (M1) and the corticospinal network during adaptation by measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) before reach onset using transcranial magnetic stimulation of M1. Subjects reached in a force field in a schedule in which the field was introduced either abruptly or gradually over many trials. In both groups, by end of the training, muscles that countered the perturbation in a given direction increased their activity during the reach (labeled as the on direction for each muscle). In the abrupt group, in the period before the reach toward the on direction, MEPs in these muscles also increased, suggesting a direction-specific increase in the excitability of the corticospinal network. However, in the gradual group, these MEP changes were missing. After training, there was a period of washout. The MEPs did not return to baseline. Rather, in the abrupt group, off direction MEPs increased to match on direction MEPs. Therefore, we observed changes in corticospinal excitability in the abrupt but not gradual condition. Abrupt training includes the repetition of motor commands, and repetition may be the key factor that produces this plasticity. Furthermore, washout did not return MEPs to baseline, suggesting that washout engaged a new network that masked but did not erase the effects of previous adaptation. Abrupt but not gradual training appears to induce changes in M1 and/or corticospinal networks.

Role of Sustained Excitability of the Leg Motor Cortex After Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Associative Plasticity

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 657-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
François D. Roy ◽  
Jonathan A. Norton ◽  
Monica A. Gorassini
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Common Peroneal Nerve ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Sensory Inputs

Changes in the strength of corticospinal projections to muscles in the upper and lower limbs are induced in conscious humans after paired associative stimulation (PAS) to the motor cortex. We tested whether an intervention of PAS consisting of 90 low-frequency (0.1-Hz) stimuli to the common peroneal nerve combined with suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) produces specific changes to the motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in lower leg muscles if the afferent volley from peripheral stimulation is timed to arrive at the motor cortex after TMS-induced firing of corticospinal neurons. Unlike PAS in the hand, MEP facilitation in the leg was produced when sensory inputs were estimated to arrive at the motor cortex over a range of 15 to 90 ms after cortical stimulation. We examined whether this broad range of facilitation occurred as a result of prolonged subthreshold excitability of the motor cortex after a single pulse of suprathreshold TMS so that coincident excitation from sensory inputs arriving many milliseconds after TMS can occur. We found that significant facilitation of MEP responses (>200%) occurred when the motor cortex was conditioned with suprathreshold TMS tens of milliseconds earlier. Likewise, it was possible to induce strong MEP facilitation (85% at 60 min) when afferent inputs were directly paired with subthreshold TMS. We argue that in the leg motor cortex, facilitation of MEP responses from PAS occurred over a large range of interstimulus intervals as a result of the paired activation of sensory inputs with sustained, subthreshold activity of cortical neurons that follow a pulse of suprathreshold TMS.

scholarly journals Motor demand-dependent improvement in accuracy following low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of left motor cortex

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 1614-1621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathrin M. Buetefisch ◽  
Benjamin Hines ◽  
Linda Shuster ◽  
Paola Pergami ◽  
Adam Mathes
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Performance ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Task ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Afferent Input ◽  
Low Frequency Rtms

The role of primary motor cortex (M1) in the control of voluntary movements is still unclear. In brain functional imaging studies of unilateral hand performance, bilateral M1 activation is inconsistently observed, and disruptions of M1 using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) lead to variable results in the hand motor performance. As the motor tasks differed qualitatively in these studies, it is conceivable that M1 contribution differs depending on the level of skillfulness. The objective of the present study was to determine whether M1 contribution to hand motor performance differed depending on the level of precision of the motor task. Here, we used low-frequency rTMS of left M1 to determine its effect on the performance of a pointing task that allows the parametric increase of the level of precision and thereby increase the level of required precision quantitatively. We found that low-frequency rTMS improved performance in both hands for the task with the highest demand on precision, whereas performance remained unchanged for the tasks with lower demands. These results suggest that the functional relevance of M1 activity for motor performance changes as a function of motor demand. The bilateral effect of rTMS to left M1 would also support the notion of M1 functions at a higher level in motor control by integrating afferent input from nonprimary motor areas.

Effect of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Interhemispheric Inhibition

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 1668-1675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramod Kr. Pal ◽  
Ritsuko Hanajima ◽  
Carolyn A. Gunraj ◽  
Jie-Yuan Li ◽  
Aparna Wagle-Shukla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Interhemispheric Inhibition ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Low Frequency Rtms

We studied the effects of 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the excitability of interhemispheric connections in 13 right-handed healthy volunteers. TMS was performed using figure-eight coils, and surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded from both first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles. A paired-pulse method with a conditioning stimulus (CS) to the motor cortex (M1) followed by a test stimulus to the opposite M1 was used to study the interhemispheric inhibition (ppIHI). Both CS and TS were adjusted to produce motor-evoked potentials of ∼1 mV in the contralateral FDI muscles. After baseline measurement of right-to-left IHI (pre-RIHI) and left-to-right IHI (pre-LIHI), rTMS was applied over left M1 at 1 Hz with 900 stimuli at 115% of resting motor threshold. After rTMS, ppIHI was studied using both the pre-rTMS CS (post-RIHI and post-LIHI) and an adjusted post-rTMS CS set to produce 1-mV motor evoked potentials (MEPs; post-RIHIadj and post-LIHIadj). The TS was set to produce 1-mV MEPs. There was a significant reduction in post-LIHI ( P = 0.0049) and post-LIHIadj ( P = 0.0169) compared with pre-LIHI at both interstimulus intervals of 10 and 40 ms. Post-RIHI was significantly reduced compared with pre-RIHI ( P = 0.0015) but pre-RIHI and post-RIHIadj were not significantly different. We conclude that 1-Hz rTMS reduces IHI in both directions but is predominantly from the stimulated to the unstimulated hemisphere. Low-frequency rTMS may be used to modulate the excitability of IHI circuits. Treatment protocols using low-frequency rTMS to reduce cortical excitability in neurological and psychiatric conditions need to take into account their effects on IHI.

scholarly journals Surround inhibition depends on the force exerted and is abnormal in focal hand dystonia

2009 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 1513-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Beck ◽  
M. Schubert ◽  
S. Pirio Richardson ◽  
M. Hallett
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Neural Mechanism ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Movement Initiation ◽  
Focal Hand Dystonia ◽  
Surround Inhibition ◽  
Hand Dystonia

There is evidence that surround inhibition (SI), a neural mechanism to enhance contrast between signals, may play a role in primary motor cortex during movement initiation, while it is deficient in patients with focal hand dystonia (FHD). To further characterize SI with respect to different force levels, single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied at rest and during index finger movement to evoke potentials in the nonsynergistic, abductor policis muscle. In Experiment 1, in 19 healthy volunteers, SI was tested using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Motor-evoked potentials at rest were compared with those during contraction using four different force levels [5, 10, 20, and 40% of maximum force (Fmax)]. In Experiments 2 and 3, SI and short intracortical inhibition (SICI) were tested, respectively, in 16 patients with FHD and 20 age-matched controls for the 10% and 20% Fmax levels. SI was most pronounced for 10% Fmax and abolished for the 40% Fmax level in controls, whereas FHD patients had no SI at all. In contrast, a loss of SICI was observed in FHD patients, which was more pronounced for 10% Fmax than for 20% Fmax. Our results suggest that SI is involved in the generation of fine finger movements with low-force levels. The greater loss of SICI for the 10% Fmax level in patients with FHD than for the 20% Fmax level indicates that this inhibitory mechanism is more abnormal at lower levels of force.

scholarly journals Comparison of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation parameters on motor cortex excitability in normal subjects

2016 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 002-006
Author(s):  
Lara Schrader ◽  
Sima Sadeghinejad ◽  
Jalleh Sadeghinejad ◽  
Movses Kazanchyan ◽  
Lisa Koski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Motor Cortex Excitability ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Abstract Background/objectives Optimal low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) parameters for treating epilepsy and other brain disorders are unknown. To address this question, a systematic study of the effects of LF-rTMS frequency and intensity on cortical excitability was performed. Methods Using a four-period crossover design, subjects were scheduled for four LF-rTMS sessions that were at least four weeks apart. LF-rTMS was delivered as 900 pulses directed at primary motor cortex using four protocols: 0.5 Hz at 90% resting motor threshold (RMT), 0.5 Hz at 110% RMT, 1 Hz at 90% RMT, and 1 Hz at 110% RMT. Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, resting motor threshold (RMT), and cortical silent period (CSP) were measured before, immediately after, and 60 min after LF-rTMS. Each of the four protocols was analyzed separately to compare baseline measurements to those after LF-rTMS. Results None of the four LF-rTMS protocols produced a trend or significant change in MEP amplitude, RMT, or CSP. Conclusion The lack of significant effect from the four LF-rTMS protocols indicates that none produced evidence for alteration of cortical excitability. The direct comparison of four LF-rTMS protocols is distinct to this investigation, as most similar studies were exploratory and studied only one or two protocols. The negative result relates only to the methods used in this investigation and does not indicate that LF-rTMS does not alter cortical excitability with other parameters. These results may be useful when designing additional investigations into the effect of LF-rTMS on epilepsy, other disorders, and cortical excitability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document