scholarly journals A BCI-based vibrotactile neurofeedback training improves motor cortical excitability during motor imagery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikita Grigorev ◽  
Andrey Savosenkov ◽  
Maksim Lukoyanov ◽  
Anna Udoratina ◽  
Natalia Shusharina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Imagery ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Dominant Hand ◽  
Mu Rhythm ◽  
Vibrotactile Feedback ◽  
Motor Cortical Excitability ◽  
Cortex Area ◽  
Motor Cortex Excitability ◽  
Motor Cortical

In this study, we address the issue of whether vibrotactile feedback can enhance the motor cortex excitability translated into the plastic changes in local cortical areas during motor imagery (MI) BCI-based training. For this purpose, we focused on two of the most notable neurophysiological effects of MI - the event-related-desynchronization (ERD) level and the increase in cortical excitability assessed with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS). For TMS navigation, we used individual high-resolution 3D brain MRIs. Ten BCI-naive and healthy adults participated in this study. The MI (rest or left/right hand imagery using Graz-BCI paradigm) tasks were performed separately in the presence and absence of feedback. To investigate how much the presence/absence of vibrotactile feedback in MI BCI-based training could contribute to the sensorimotor cortical activations, we compared the MEPs amplitude during MI after training with and without feedback. In addition, the ERD levels during MI BCI-based training were investigated. Our findings provide evidence that applying vibrotactile feedback during MI training leads to (i) an enhancement of the desynchronization level of mu-rhythm EEG patterns over the contralateral motor cortex area corresponding to the MI of the non-dominant hand; (ii) an increase in motor cortical excitability in hand muscle representation corresponding to a muscle engaged by the MI.

scholarly journals Aberrances of Cortex Excitability and Connectivity Underlying Motor Deficit in Acute Stroke

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Du ◽  
Jianping Hu ◽  
Jingze Hu ◽  
Qiang Xu ◽  
Qirui Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Deficit ◽  
Motor Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Cortex Excitability ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Motor Cortical

Purpose. This study was aimed at evaluating the motor cortical excitability and connectivity underlying the neural mechanism of motor deficit in acute stroke by the combination of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electrophysiological measures. Methods. Twenty-five patients with motor deficit after acute ischemic stroke were involved. General linear model and dynamic causal model analyses were applied to fMRI data for detecting motor-related activation and effective connectivity of the motor cortices. Motor cortical excitability was determined as a resting motor threshold (RMT) of motor evoked potential detected by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). fMRI results were correlated with cortical excitability and upper extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment scores, respectively. Results. Greater fMRI activation likelihood and motor cortical excitability in the ipsilesional primary motor area (M1) region were associated with better motor performance. During hand movements, the inhibitory connectivity from the contralesional to the ipsilesional M1 was correlated with the degree of motor impairment. Furthermore, ipsilesional motor cortex excitability was correlated with an enhancement of promoting connectivity in ipsilesional M1 or a reduction of interhemispheric inhibition in contralesional M1. Conclusions. The study suggested that a dysfunction of the ipsilesional M1 and abnormal interhemispheric interactions might underlie the motor disability in acute ischemic stroke. Modifying the excitability of the motor cortex and correcting the abnormal motor network connectivity associated with the motor deficit might be the therapeutic target in early neurorehabilitation for stroke patients.

scholarly journals Modulation of motor cortical excitability with auditory stimulation

2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 920-925
Author(s):  
Olli Löfberg ◽  
Petro Julkunen ◽  
Elisa Kallioniemi ◽  
Ari Pääkkönen ◽  
Jari Karhu
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Auditory Evoked Potentials ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Cortex Excitability ◽  
Motor Cortical ◽  
Arousal Reaction

Loud sounds have been demonstrated to increase motor cortex excitability when transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is synchronized with auditory evoked N100 potential measured from electroencephalography (EEG). The N100 potential is generated by an afferent response to sound onset and feature analysis, and upon novel sound it is also related to the arousal reaction. The arousal reaction is known to originate from the ascending reticular activating system of the brain stem and to modulate neuronal activity throughout the central nervous system. In this study we investigated the difference in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) when deviant and novelty stimuli were randomly interspersed in a train of standard tones. Twelve healthy subjects participated in this study. Three types of sound stimuli were used: 1) standard stimuli (800 Hz), 2) deviant stimuli (560 Hz), and 3) novelty stimuli (12 different sounds). In each stimulus sequence 600 stimuli were given. Of these, 90 were deviant stimuli randomly placed between the standard stimuli. Each of 12 novel sounds was presented once in pseudorandomized order. TMS was randomly mixed with the sound stimuli so that it was either synchronized with the individual N100 or trailed the sound onset by 200 ms. All sounds elicited an increase in motor cortex excitability. The type of sound had no significant effect. We also demonstrated that TMS timed at 200-ms intervals caused a significant increment of MEPs. This contradicted our hypothesis that MEP amplitudes to TMS synchronized with N100 would be greater than those to TMS at 200 ms after a sound and remains unexplained. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrated modulation of motor cortical excitability with parallel auditory stimulus by combining navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with auditory stimuli. TMS was synchronized with auditory evoked potentials considered to be generated by the unconscious attention call process in the auditory system.

Paired-pulse measures

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ritsuko Hanajima ◽  
Yoshikazu Ugawa
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Paired Pulse ◽  
Motor Cortical Excitability ◽  
Interhemispheric Connectivity ◽  
Conditioned Motor ◽  
Human Motor ◽  
Motor Cortical ◽  
Insight Into

This article reviews the physiology and application of the currently available paired-pulse protocols. Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) techniques study the modulation of human motor cortical excitability. Paired-pulse experiments are designed to give insight into the nature of the cortical circuitry activated by TMS. Changes in motor cortical excitability produced by the conditioning pulse are estimated by changes in the size of the conditioned motor-evoked potential (MEP). It is possible to identify specific abnormalities in the balance between inhibitory and facilitatory processes, even if the pathology lies in abnormal afferent signalling to the motor cortex rather than in the motor cortex itself. The conclusion that emerges from the studies on interhemispheric interactions is that it is now possible by means of TMS protocols to chart long-range functional interhemispheric connectivity of remote areas of the human brain.

Decreased input to the motor cortex increases motor cortical excitability

2006 ◽  
Vol 117 (11) ◽  
pp. 2496-2503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Todd ◽  
Jane E. Butler ◽  
S.C. Gandevia ◽  
Janet L. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Cortical

scholarly journals Recovery of the 20 Hz Rebound to Tactile and Proprioceptive Stimulation after Stroke

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eeva Parkkonen ◽  
Kristina Laaksonen ◽  
Lauri Parkkonen ◽  
Nina Forss
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Afferent Input ◽  
Motor Recovery ◽  
Somatosensory Stimulation ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Potential Marker ◽  
Motor Cortex Excitability ◽  
Motor Cortical

Sensorimotor integration is closely linked to changes in motor-cortical excitability, observable in the modulation of the 20 Hz rhythm. After somatosensory stimulation, the rhythm transiently increases as a rebound that reflects motor-cortex inhibition. Stroke-induced alterations in afferent input likely affect motor-cortex excitability and motor recovery. To study the role of somatosensory afferents in motor-cortex excitability after stroke, we employed magnetoencephalographic recordings (MEG) at 1–7 days, one month, and 12 months in 23 patients with stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory and 22 healthy controls. The modulation of the 20 Hz motor-cortical rhythm was evaluated to two different somatosensory stimuli, tactile stimulation, and passive movement of the index fingers. The rebound strengths to both stimuli were diminished in the acute phase compared to the controls and increased significantly during the first month after stroke. However, only the rebound amplitudes to tactile stimuli fully recovered within the follow-up period. The rebound strengths in the affected hemisphere to both stimuli correlated strongly with the clinical scores across the follow-up. The results show that changes in the 20 Hz rebound to both stimuli behave similarly and occur predominantly during the first month. The 20 Hz rebound is a potential marker for predicting motor recovery after stroke.

scholarly journals A BCI-based vibrotactile neurofeedback training improves motor cortical excitability during motor imagery

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Nikita A. Grigorev ◽  
Andrey O. Savosenkov ◽  
Maksim V. Lukoyanov ◽  
Maksim V. Lukoyanov ◽  
Anna Udoratina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Imagery ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Neurofeedback Training ◽  
Motor Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Cortical

scholarly journals Differences between motor execution and motor imagery of grasping movements in the motor cortical excitatory circuit

PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e5588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-Jiang Meng ◽  
Yan-Ling Pi ◽  
Ke Liu ◽  
Na Cao ◽  
Yan-Qiu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Imagery ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Motor Execution ◽  
Human Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Cortical ◽  
The Right

Background Both motor imagery (MI) and motor execution (ME) can facilitate motor cortical excitability. Although cortical excitability is modulated by intracortical inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the human primary motor cortex, it is not clear which intracortical circuits determine the differences in corticospinal excitability between ME and MI. Methods We recruited 10 young healthy subjects aged 18−28 years (mean age: 22.1 ± 3.14 years; five women and five men) for this study. The experiment consisted of two sets of tasks involving grasp actions of the right hand: imagining and executing them. Corticospinal excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) were measured before the interventional protocol using transcranial magnetic stimulation (baseline), as well as at 0, 20, and 40 min (T0, T20, and T40) thereafter. Results Facilitation of corticospinal excitability was significantly greater after ME than after MI in the right abductor pollicis brevis (APB) at T0 and T20 (p < 0.01 for T0, and p < 0.05 for T20), but not in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. On the other hand, no significant differences in SICI between ME and MI were found in the APB and FDI muscles. The facilitation of corticospinal excitability at T20 after MI correlated with the Movement Imagery Questionnaire (MIQ) scores for kinesthetic items (Rho = −0.646, p = 0.044) but did not correlate with the MIQ scores for visual items (Rho = −0.265, p = 0.458). Discussion The present results revealed significant differences between ME and MI on intracortical excitatory circuits of the human motor cortex, suggesting that cortical excitability differences between ME and MI may be attributed to the activation differences of the excitatory circuits in the primary motor cortex.

scholarly journals Effect of observation combined with motor imagery of a skilled hand-motor task on motor cortical excitability: Difference between novice and expert

2012 ◽  
Vol 518 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izumi Tsukazaki ◽  
Kazumasa Uehara ◽  
Takuya Morishita ◽  
Masato Ninomiya ◽  
Kozo Funase
Keyword(s):  
Motor Imagery ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Task ◽  
Motor Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Cortical

A Temporally Asymmetric Hebbian Rule Governing Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 2339-2345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Wolters ◽  
Friedhelm Sandbrink ◽  
Antje Schlottmann ◽  
Erwin Kunesch ◽  
Katja Stefan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Long Term Potentiation ◽  
Long Term Depression ◽  
Human Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Cortical Excitability ◽  
Human Motor ◽  
Motor Cortical

Synaptic plasticity is conspicuously dependent on the temporal order of the pre- and postsynaptic activity. Human motor cortical excitability can be increased by a paired associative stimulation (PAS) protocol. Here we show that it can also be decreased by minimally changing the interval between the two associative stimuli. Corticomotor excitability of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) representation was tested before and after repetitively pairing of single right median nerve simulation with single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered over the optimal site for activation of the contralateral APB. Following PAS, depression of TMS-evoked motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) was induced only when the median nerve stimulation preceded the TMS pulse by 10 ms, while enhancement of cortical excitability was induced using an interstimulus interval of 25 ms, suggesting an important role of the sequence of cortical events triggered by the two stimulation modalities. Experiments using F-wave studies and electrical brain stem stimulation indicated that the site of the plastic changes underlying the decrease of MEP amplitudes following PAS (10 ms) was within the motor cortex. MEP amplitudes remained depressed for approximately 90 min. The decrease of MEP amplitudes was blocked when PAS(10 ms) was performed under the influence of dextromethorphan, an N-methyl-d-aspartate-receptor antagonist, or nimodipine, an L-type voltage-gated calcium-channel antagonist. The physiological profile of the depression of human motor cortical excitability following PAS(10 ms) suggests long-term depression of synaptic efficacy to be involved. Together with earlier findings, this study suggests that strict temporal Hebbian rules govern the induction of long-term potentiation/long-term depression-like phenomena in vivo in the human primary motor cortex.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document