scholarly journals Musculoskeletal modelling of sprawling and parasagittal forelimbs provides insight into synapsid postural transition

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J Brocklehurst ◽  
Philip Fahn-Lai ◽  
Sophie Regnault ◽  
Stephanie E Pierce

The sprawling-parasagittal postural shift was a major transition during synapsid evolution and is considered key to mammalian ecological diversity. Despite a good fossil record, debate remains over when the shift to parasagittal posture occurred, primarily due to limited comparative biomechanical data on extant species. Here, we built forelimb musculoskeletal models of three extant taxa that bracket the sprawling-parasagittal transition: a tegu lizard, an echidna, and an opossum. We measured shoulder joint range of motion (ROM) about all three degrees of rotational freedom and characterized shoulder muscle moment arms (MMAs) across the entire pose space. Our results show that both the opossum and the tegu had high shoulder joint ROM, and both were substantially higher than the echidna. However, the opossum occupied a distinct region of pose space characterized by high humeral retraction angles. There are clear interspecific differences in MMAs related to posture, with the sprawling tegu and echidna emphasizing humeral depression, and the parasagittal opossum emphasizing humeral elevation. There are also notable differences between our sprawling taxa, with the echidna possessing much greater moment arms for humeral pronation than the tegu. We demonstrate clear functional variation between locomotor grades and use these data to hypothesize major shifts in forelimb function and posture along the mammalian stem.

2006 ◽  
Vol 69 (12) ◽  
pp. 556-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Gill ◽  
Louise Gustafsson ◽  
Linda Hawcroft ◽  
Kryss McKenna

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000805
Author(s):  
Keramat Ullah Keramat ◽  
Muhammad Naveed Babur

ObjectiveTo evaluate the immediate effects of pragmatic posterior capsular stretch (PPCS) on shoulder joint range of motion (ROM).MethodA quasi-experimental design was used to recruit healthy subjects of age 21.43 (±1.960) years, height 165.8 (±2.1069) cm and weight 63.90 (±13.187) kg. Inclusion criteria were grade 1 and grade 2 of the shoulder mobility test of functional movement screening. Preintervention and postintervention measurement of flexion, abduction, internal rotation (IR), external rotation (ER), reaching up behind the back (RUBTB) and reaching down behind the neck (RDBTN) were compared. A therapist-administered PPCS was the only intervention applied.ResultsPaired t-test statistics showed improvement (mean°±SD) in shoulder flexion (13.5°±8.11), abduction (11°±8.35), IR (8.5°±10.27), ER (7.83°±7.15), RUBTB (17.34°±13.81) inches and RDBTN (2.93±1.52) inches. The changes in these ROM and functional movements were statistically significant (p<0.05).ConclusionPPCS can effectively improve the functional movement of RUBTB and shoulder ROM in healthy subjects. It is recommended for the trials on prevention and rehabilitation of shoulder pathologies.Trial registration numberNCT04242888.


2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 2232-2235
Author(s):  
Marius Moga ◽  
Mark Edward Pogarasteanu ◽  
Antoine Edu

The role of arthroscopy in incipient and mild arthrosis, even combined with proximal tibial ostetomy, is well known and well documented. On the other hand, its role in the treatment of advanced arthrosis of the large joints, especially the knee, is a subject of controversy. The proponents of the use of arthroscopy in advanced arthrosis claim that meniscectomy, synovectomy, ostophytectomy, chondral lesion stabilization, arthroscopic release, plica and loose body removal greatly improve the quality of life for most patients, especially if followed by the use of viscoelastic injection, by diminishing pain and improving joint range of motion. The opponents claim that, even though the advantages are clear in the cases that refuse arthroplasty, in all the other cases the surgical indication should be total knee arthroplasty, as the clinical relief is temporary, but with all the risks of a surgical intervention. We have conducted an overview of the recent literature, in order to find objective evidence to sustain either point of view. We focused on articles published that included an objective measurement of before and after clinical status through clinical scores and objective measurements. We also focused on the follow-up period and on the evolution of the pathology after arthroscopy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document