scholarly journals Prediction and action in cortical pain processing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina Koppel ◽  
Giovanni Novembre ◽  
Robin Kämpe ◽  
Mattias Savallampi ◽  
India Morrison

AbstractPredicting that a stimulus is painful facilitates action to avoid harm. But does the prediction of upcoming painful events engage the same or different processes than acting to avoid or reduce current pain? In this fMRI experiment, we investigated brain activity as a function of current and predicted painful or nonpainful thermal stimulation, and the ability of voluntary action to affect the duration of the upcoming stimulation. Participants (n = 30) performed a task which involved the administration of a painful or nonpainful stimulus (S1), which predicted an immediately subsequent very painful or nonpainful stimulus (S2). Participants’ task was to press a response button within a short time window upon the presentation of a response cue during S1. On action-effective trials, pressing the button within the specified time window reduced the duration of the upcoming stimulation. On action-ineffective trials, pressing the button had no effect on upcoming stimulation. Predicted pain increased activation in regions including anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), midcingulate cortex (MCC), and insula; however, activation in ACC and MCC depended on whether a meaningful action was performed, with MCC activation showing a direct relationship with motor output. Region-of-interest analyses revealed that insula’s responses for predicted pain were also modulated by potential action consequences, especially in the left hemisphere, albeit without a direct relationship with motor output. Taken together, these findings suggest that cortical pain processing is not specifically tied to the sensory stimulus, but instead depends on the consequences of that stimulus for sensorimotor control of behavior.Significance statementDuring acute pain, the processing of an acute sensory event likely occurs in parallel with predictive processing about its relevance for current and upcoming voluntary behavior. Here, we temporally separated the functional processes underlying current and predicted pain and found that activation in regions typically implicated in acute pain is modulated both by the noxious nature of upcoming events, as well as by the possibility to affect those events via voluntary action. Specifically, activation in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), midcingulate cortex (MCC), and insula during the delivery of a painful or nonpainful stimulus was modulated by whether an upcoming stimulus would be painful. Furthermore, ACC/MCC involvement in pain prediction depended on whether a meaningful action was performed, i.e., whether a button-press action would reduce the duration of the upcoming stimulus. Although insula activation was also affected by the possibility of the button-press action to reduce the duration of the upcoming stimulation, only MCC had a direct relationship with motor output.

Author(s):  
Perry N. Fuchs ◽  
Yuan Bo Peng ◽  
Jessica A. Boyette-Davis ◽  
Megan L. Uhelski

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 709-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Fallon ◽  
Carl Roberts ◽  
Andrej Stancak

Abstract Background Empathy for pain is a complex phenomenon incorporating sensory, cognitive and affective processes. Functional neuroimaging studies indicate a rich network of brain activations for empathic processing. However, previous research focused on core activations in bilateral anterior insula (AI) and anterior cingulate/anterior midcingulate cortex (ACC/aMCC) which are also typically present during nociceptive (pain) processing. Theoretical understanding of empathy would benefit from empirical investigation of shared and contrasting brain activations for empathic and nociceptive processing. Method Thirty-nine empathy for observed pain studies (1112 participants; 527 foci) were selected by systematic review. Coordinate based meta-analysis (activation likelihood estimation) was performed and novel contrast analyses compared neurobiological processing of empathy with a comprehensive meta-analysis of 180 studies of nociceptive processing (Tanasescu et al., 2016). Results Conjunction analysis indicated overlapping activations for empathy and nociception in AI, aMCC, somatosensory and inferior frontal regions. Contrast analysis revealed increased likelihood of activation for empathy, relative to nociception, in bilateral supramarginal, inferior frontal and occipitotemporal regions. Nociception preferentially activated bilateral posterior insula, somatosensory cortex and aMCC. Conclusion Our findings support the likelihood of shared and distinct neural networks for empathic, relative to nociceptive, processing. This offers succinct empirical support for recent tiered or modular theoretical accounts of empathy.


Author(s):  
Zhengdong Xiao ◽  
Erik Martinez ◽  
Prathamesh M. Kulkarni ◽  
Qiaosheng Zhang ◽  
Qianning Hou ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 3823-3830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura L. Symonds ◽  
Nakia S. Gordon ◽  
Jonathan C. Bixby ◽  
Margaret M. Mande

Neuroimaging studies of human pain have revealed a widespread “pain matrix” distributed across both hemispheres of the brain. It is not resolved whether the pain matrix is biased toward one hemisphere, although behavioral and clinical data suggest that pain is perceived differently on the two sides of the body, and several neuroimaging studies suggest that pain processing in some regions of cortex may be lateralized toward the right hemisphere. The current study used fMRI in nine subjects to determine whether acute pain is preferentially processed in one cortical hemisphere. All cortical areas that were activated during the painful simulation were investigated, and several analytic approaches were used to directly compare activated regions to similar regions in the opposite hemisphere. Results indicated that four regions of the cortical pain matrix were activated either contralaterally (somatosensory cortex) or bilaterally (mid/posterior insula, anterior insula, and posterior cingulate). In addition, activation in five cortical regions during acute pain stimulation was localized either exclusively in the right hemisphere or was strongly lateralized to the right. These five areas were in the middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate, inferior frontal gyrus, medial/superior frontal gyri, and inferior parietal lobule. The location of some of these regions is consistent with the idea that there may be a right-lateralized attentional system to alert an organism to an infrequent, but behaviorally relevant, stimulus such as pain.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L Meier ◽  
Sonja Widmayer ◽  
Nuno M.P. de Matos ◽  
Jetmir Abazi ◽  
Dominik A Ettlin

AbstractConverging lines of evidence indicate that the pain experience emerges from distributed cortical nodes that share nociceptive information. While the theory of a single pain center is still not falsifiable by current neuroimaging technology, the validation of distinct brain mechanisms for acute pain and its relief is ongoing and strongly dependent on the employed experimental design. In the current study including a total of 28 subjects, a recently presented, innovative experimental approach was adopted that is able to clearly differentiate painful from non-pain perceptions without changing stimulus strength and while recording brain activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Namely, we applied a repetitive and purely nociceptive stimulus to the tooth pulp with subsequent suppression of the nociceptive barrage via a regional nerve block. The study aims were 1) to replicate previous findings of acute pain demonstrating a fundamental role of the operculo-insular region and 2) to explore its functional connectivity during pain and subsequent relief. The brain activity reduction in the posterior insula (pINS) due to pain extinction was confirmed. In addition, the posterior S2 region (OP1) showed a similar activity pattern, thus confirming the relevance of the operculo-insular cortex in acute pain processing. Furthermore, the functional connectivity analysis yielded an enhanced positive coupling of the pINS with the cerebellar culmen during pain relief, whereas the OP1 demonstrated a positive coupling with the posterior midcingulate cortex during pain. The current results support the conceptual synthesis of localized specialization of pain processing with interactions across distributed neural targets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document