scholarly journals Therapeutic KRASG12C inhibition drives effective interferon-mediated anti-tumour immunity in immunogenic lung cancers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edurne Mugarza ◽  
Febe van Maldegem ◽  
Jesse Boumelha ◽  
Christopher Moore ◽  
Sareena Rana ◽  
...  

The recent development and approval of KRASG12C inhibitors promises to change profoundly the clinical management of lung cancer patients harbouring KRASG12C mutations. However, early clinical data indicate that acquired drug resistance can frequently develop after the initial response. Due to the immunosuppressive nature of the signaling network controlled by oncogenic KRAS, targeted KRASG12C inhibition can indirectly affect anti-tumour immunity. This has served as a rationale for combination with immune checkpoint blockade, showing therapeutic benefit in certain immunogenic pre-clinical tumour models. In this study, we characterised how KRASG12C inhibition reverses immune suppression driven by oncogenic KRAS in a number of pre-clinical lung cancer models with varying levels of immunogenicity. Mechanistically, KRASG12C inhibition upregulates interferon pathway gene expression via inhibition of Myc and, in tumours, leads to reduced infiltration of immunosuppressive cells, increased interferon responses and antigen presentation, and also enhanced infiltration and activation of cytotoxic T cells. However, the combination of KRASG12C inhibitors with immune checkpoint blockade only provides synergistic benefit in the most immunogenic tumour model, with KRASG12C inhibition failing to sensitize cold tumours to immunotherapy. In immunogenic tumours, complete responses to KRASG12C inhibition requires tumour cell autonomous interferon gamma signaling. Our data have important implications for the design of clinical trials combining KRASG12C inhibitors with anti-PD-1 drugs and suggest that additional combination strategies will be needed for immunotherapy refractory patients.

2021 ◽  
pp. jim-2021-001806
Author(s):  
Hannah Elizabeth Green ◽  
Jorge Nieva

The advent of checkpoint blockade-based immunotherapy is rapidly changing the management of lung cancer. Whereas past anticancer drugs’ primary toxicity was hematologic, the newer agents have primarily autoimmune toxicity. Thus, it is no longer enough for oncology practitioners to be skilled only in hematology. They must also understand management of autoimmune conditions, leveraging the skills of the rheumatologist, endocrinologist and gastroenterologist in the process. Herein we describe the mechanism of action and toxicities associated with immune checkpoint blockade in patients with lung cancer and provide a framework for management of adverse events.


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1764-1767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuko Horio ◽  
Koutaro Takamatsu ◽  
Daisuke Tamanoi ◽  
Ryo Sato ◽  
Koichi Saruwatari ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A5.1-A5
Author(s):  
A Martinez-Usatorre ◽  
E Kadioglu ◽  
C Cianciaruso ◽  
B Torchia ◽  
J Faget ◽  
...  

BackgroundImmune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with antibodies against PD-1 or PD-L1 may provide therapeutic benefits in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, most tumours are resistant and cases of disease hyper-progression have also been reported.Materials and MethodsGenetically engineered mouse models of KrasG12Dp53null NSCLC were treated with cisplatin along with antibodies against angiopoietin-2/VEGFA, PD-1 and CSF1R. Tumour growth was monitored by micro-computed tomography and the tumour vasculature and immune cell infiltrates were assessed by immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometry.ResultsCombined angiopoietin-2/VEGFA blockade by a bispecific antibody (A2V) modulated the vasculature and abated immunosuppressive macrophages while increasing CD8+effector T cells in the tumours, achieving disease stabilization comparable or superior to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. However, these immunological responses were unexpectedly limited by the addition of a PD-1 antibody, which paradoxically enhanced progression of a fraction of the tumours through a mechanism involving regulatory T cells and macrophages. Elimination of tumour-associated macrophages with a CSF1R-blocking antibody induced NSCLC regression in combination with PD-1 blockade and cisplatin.ConclusionsThe immune cell composition of the tumour determines the outcome of PD-1 blockade. In NSCLC, high infiltration of regulatory T cells and immunosuppressive macrophages may account for tumour hyper-progression upon ICB.Disclosure InformationA. Martinez-Usatorre: None. E. Kadioglu: None. C. Cianciaruso: None. B. Torchia: None. J. Faget: None. E. Meylan: None. M. Schmittnaegel: None. I. Keklikoglou: None. M. De Palma: None.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9052-9052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Vailati Negrao ◽  
Alexandre Reuben ◽  
Jacqulyne Ponville Robichaux ◽  
Xiuning Le ◽  
Monique B. Nilsson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8556-8556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Chu Victoria Lai ◽  
Hira Rizvi ◽  
Jacklynn V. Egger ◽  
Andrew J. Plodkowski ◽  
Michelle S. Ginsberg ◽  
...  

8556 Background: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is now a routine component of treatment in recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We evaluated the response to ICB in patients (pts) with recurrent SCLC and genomic features of response using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Methods: Pts with recurrent SCLC treated with ICB were identified. The majority of pts were treated outside of a clinical trial to focus emphasis on the real-world experience. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) and the landscape of somatic variants were determined by targeted NGS using MSK-IMPACT. Objective response rate (ORR) to ICB was determined using RECIST v1.1. PFS and OS were measured from the start of ICB and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier. Results: Between December 2013 and October 2018, 108 pts with SCLC were treated with ICB (57 subjected to NGS). Pts received PD-1 monotherapy alone (n = 28) or in combination with CTLA-4 blockade (n = 80). Median line of therapy was 2 (range 1-6). ORR was 14% (15/108, 95% CI 8-22%). From the start of ICB, median PFS was 1.4 months in non-responders and 10.8 months in responders (HR 0.2; 95% CI 0.13-0.32). Median OS was 6.3 months in non-responders and undefined in responders (range 8-44 months) (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.16-0.44). Four responders remain on ICB treatment. TMB in the ICB-treated cohort was similar to that of an unselected cohort (n = 233) of SCLC (median 8.8 Mt/MB vs 8.2 Mt/MB, p = 0.71). Clinical benefit was enriched among those with a higher TMB (upper vs middle/lower tertile PFS HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.84, p = 0.01 and ORR 26% [5/19] vs ORR 8% [3/38]). Rates of whole genome duplication and commonly altered genes in SCLC ( TP53, RB1, KMT2C/D, NOTCH1/2/4, PTPRD, APC) were similarly distributed across responders and non-responders. Completion of whole-exome sequencing and PD-L1 testing is in progress. Conclusions: In pts with recurrent SCLC receiving routine clinical care, the ORR to ICB is comparable to reports from clinical trials. A high TMB was associated with a longer median PFS and better response. Further investigation into the genomic landscape of recurrent SCLC is needed to identify biomarkers predictive of response to ICB.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document