scholarly journals The SERM/SERD Bazedoxifene Disrupts ESR1 Helix 12 to Overcome Acquired Hormone Resistance in Breast Cancer Cells

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean W. Fanning ◽  
Rinath Jeselsohn ◽  
Venkatasubramanian Dharmarajan ◽  
Christopher G. Mayne ◽  
Mostafa Karimi ◽  
...  

AbstractAcquired resistance to endocrine therapy remains a significant clinical burden for breast cancer patients. Somatic mutations in theESR1(estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) gene ligand-binding domain (LBD) represent a recognized mechanism of acquired resistance. Antiestrogens with improved efficacy versus tamoxifen might overcome the resistant phenotype in ER+ breast cancers. Bazedoxifene (BZA) is a potent antiestrogen that is clinically approved for use in hormone replacement therapies. We find BZA possesses improved inhibitory potency against the Y537S and D538G ERα mutants compared to tamoxifen and has additional inhibitory activity in combination with the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. In addition, comprehensive biophysical and structural biology studies show that BZA’s selective estrogen receptor degrading (SERD) properties that override the stabilizing effects of the Y537S and D538G ERα mutations.SignificanceBazedoxifene (BZA) is a potent orally available antiestrogen that is clinically approved for use in hormone replacement therapy (DUAVEE). We explore the efficacy of BZA to inhibit activating somatic mutants of ERα that can arise in metastatic breast cancers after prolonged exposure to aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen therapy. Breast cancer cell line, biophysical, and structural data show that BZA disrupts helix 12 of the ERα ligand binding domain to achieve improved potency against Y537S and D538G somatic mutants compared to 4-hydroxytamoxifen.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15647-e15647
Author(s):  
Sean W. Fanning ◽  
Geoffrey Greene ◽  
Maureen G. Conlan

e15647 Background: Antiestrogens are a mainstay of treatment for estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer in both the adjuvant and the advanced/metastatic settings. Elacestrant is a mixed activity selective estrogen receptor (SER) alpha (ERα) antagonist, acting as a SER modulator (SERM) at low doses and a SER degrader (SERD) at high doses. It has shown activity in hormone sensitive wild type (WT) ERα and insensitive estrogen receptor gene 1 (ESR1) mutation-harboring (Y537S and D538G) ERα breast cancer, both in preclinical models and in clinical studies. It also possesses a unique pharmacology compared to other competitive ER antagonists in its ability to cross the blood brain barrier. Competitive ERα antagonists are typically comprised of a core that sits in the ligand binding pocket and an arm that manipulates the structure to achieve SERM or SERD activities. In these molecules, the arm is attached in the same position as the triphenylethylene core of tamoxifen. However, elacestrant possesses a novel site of attachment. As such, we hypothesized that elacestrant adopts an alternative binding orientation in the ERα ligand binding pocket to achieve its unique pharmaceutical profiles. Methods: X-ray crystallography was used to solve a co-crystal structure of elacestrant in complex with WT ERα ligand binding domain to 2Å. Results: Overall, elacestrant promotes the formation of a canonical ERα ligand binding domain antagonist conformation, whereby helix 12 (H12) is docked into the activating function-2 cleft. However, elacestrant adopts a novel vector in the ERα ligand binding pocket that places it in close proximity to helix 12. As a result, it forms a bifurcated hydrogen bond that is not observed in other competitive antiestrogens and samples a chemical space known to increase H12 mobility and induce SERD activity. This novel vector also places it near positions 537 and 538, the two most common sites of somatic mutation. Conclusions: The high-resolution x-ray crystal structure of elacestrant suggests that the unique binding mode it adopts enables novel pharmacology and positions it to achieve potency in the WT and activating somatic ERα mutated breast cancer setting.


eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean W Fanning ◽  
Rinath Jeselsohn ◽  
Venkatasubramanian Dharmarajan ◽  
Christopher G Mayne ◽  
Mostafa Karimi ◽  
...  

Acquired resistance to endocrine therapy remains a significant clinical burden for breast cancer patients. Somatic mutations in the ESR1 (estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)) gene ligand-binding domain (LBD) represent a recognized mechanism of acquired resistance. Antiestrogens with improved efficacy versus tamoxifen might overcome the resistant phenotype in ER +breast cancers. Bazedoxifene (BZA) is a potent antiestrogen that is clinically approved for use in hormone replacement therapies. We found that BZA possesses improved inhibitory potency against the Y537S and D538G ERα mutants compared to tamoxifen and has additional inhibitory activity in combination with the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. In addition, comprehensive biophysical and structural biology studies show BZA’s selective estrogen receptor degrading (SERD) properties that override the stabilizing effects of the Y537S and D538G ERα mutations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 180 (3) ◽  
pp. 623-623
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Gonzalez ◽  
Molly Hancock ◽  
Siqi Sun ◽  
Christina L. Gersch ◽  
Jose M. Larios ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (31) ◽  
pp. 6063-6071
Author(s):  
Ranju Pokhrel ◽  
Tang Tang ◽  
Justin M. Holub

Fluorescent labeling coupled with bipartite tetracysteine display enables the surveillance of ligand-mediated helix 12 transitions within the estrogen receptor α ligand-binding domain.


2020 ◽  
Vol 180 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Gonzalez ◽  
Molly Hancock ◽  
Siqi Sun ◽  
Christina L. Gersch ◽  
Jose M. Larios ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angélica Santiago-Gómez ◽  
Ilaria Dragoni ◽  
Roisin NicAmhlaoibh ◽  
Elisabeth Trivier ◽  
Verity Sabin ◽  
...  

AbstractDespite the effectiveness of endocrine therapies to treat estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast tumours, two thirds of patients will eventually relapse due tode novoor acquired resistance to these agents. Cancer Stem-like Cells (CSCs), a rare cell population within the tumour, accumulate after anti-estrogen treatments and are likely to contribute to their failure. Here we studied the role of p21-activated kinase 4 (PAK4) as a promising target to overcome endocrine resistance and disease progression in ER+ breast cancers. PAK4 predicts for resistance to tamoxifen and poor prognosis in 2 independent cohorts of ER+ tumours. We observed that PAK4 strongly correlates with CSC activity in metastatic patient-derived samples irrespective of breast cancer subtype. However, PAK4-driven mammosphere-forming CSC activity increases alongside progression only in ER+ metastatic samples. PAK4 activity increases in ER+ models during acquired resistance to endocrine therapies. Targeting PAK4 with either CRT PAKi, a small molecule inhibitor of PAK4, or with specific siRNAs abrogates CSC activity/self-renewal in clinical samples and endocrine-resistant cells. Together, our findings establish that PAK4 regulates stemness during disease progression and that its inhibition reverses endocrine resistance in ER+ breast cancers.HighlightsPAK4 predicts for failure of endocrine therapies and poor prognosisPAK4 drives stemness and progression in ER+ metastatic breast cancerTargeting PAK4 abrogates breast CSC activity and restores sensitivity to endocrine treatmentsTargeting PAK4 will improve outcome of ER+ breast cancer patientsList of Abbreviations that appeared in abstractCancer Stem-like Cells (CSCs)p21-activated kinase 4 (PAK4)Estrogen Receptor (ER)


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome Nwachukwu ◽  
Jian Min ◽  
Sathish K Srinivasan ◽  
Erumbi Rangarajan ◽  
Valeria Sanabria Guillen ◽  
...  

Abstract Although most estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive breast cancers initially respond well to endocrine therapies using aromatase inhibitors (AIs) or antiestrogens, after varying time periods the cancer frequently recurs as metastatic disease. A significant fraction of these recurrences are driven by ERs that have acquired activating mutations in their ligand binding domains (LBDs), giving them constitutive activity and thus resistance to AIs. Because these mutations also reduce the affinity and potency of SERMs and SERDs, expanded efforts have been made to vary the structure of antiestrogens to make them more potent. Typical antiestrogens are comprised of a core element that binds securely in the ligand binding pocket and from which extends a single ring (ring E) having a side chain that sterically interferes with the position of helix-12 by direct antagonism, reorienting it so that it occludes the activation function 2 (AF2) hydrophobic groove for coactivator binding. Through structural studies, we found that bridged oxabicycloheptene-sulfonamide (OBHS-N) core ligands have two rings (E and F) that can be poised to engage in both “direct antagonism” and “indirect antagonism”, the latter of which disrupts the orientation of helix-12 by impinging on helix-11 and the helix-11–12 loop. In this study, we have placed typical antiestrogen side chains on either the E or the F ring of OBHS-N core ligands and characterized their activities in ERα-positive breast cancer cells. All compounds have full antiproliferative activity and reverse estrogen-regulated gene expression, with the antiproliferative potency of each type of side chain having a distinct preference for E- vs F-ring attachment. Conformational analysis using a multiplexed coregulator peptide interaction assay shows that compounds with an E-ring substitution have interaction profiles similar to 4-hydroxytamoxifen and fulvestrant, whereas the F-ring substitution gives a very different pattern, suggesting that the antagonist activity of the two classes rely on different sets of coregulator proteins. A large number of high resolution (better than 2 Å) X-ray crystal structures reveal that this set of novel ER antagonists disrupt the conformation of the ER LBD in a variety of ways, several of which are distinct from those seen with previous antiestrogens such as Tamoxifen and Fulvestrant. Our findings expand design concepts by which ERα ligands can block the activity of this receptor and illustrate how direct and indirect modes of ER antagonism can be combined to facilitate the development of more efficacious antiestrogens for breast cancer treatment and possibly for regulating ER-mediated activities in other estrogen target tissues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document