X-ray crystal structure analysis of elacestrant (RAD1901), a novel selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), bound to estrogen receptor alpha ligand binding domain.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15647-e15647
Author(s):  
Sean W. Fanning ◽  
Geoffrey Greene ◽  
Maureen G. Conlan

e15647 Background: Antiestrogens are a mainstay of treatment for estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer in both the adjuvant and the advanced/metastatic settings. Elacestrant is a mixed activity selective estrogen receptor (SER) alpha (ERα) antagonist, acting as a SER modulator (SERM) at low doses and a SER degrader (SERD) at high doses. It has shown activity in hormone sensitive wild type (WT) ERα and insensitive estrogen receptor gene 1 (ESR1) mutation-harboring (Y537S and D538G) ERα breast cancer, both in preclinical models and in clinical studies. It also possesses a unique pharmacology compared to other competitive ER antagonists in its ability to cross the blood brain barrier. Competitive ERα antagonists are typically comprised of a core that sits in the ligand binding pocket and an arm that manipulates the structure to achieve SERM or SERD activities. In these molecules, the arm is attached in the same position as the triphenylethylene core of tamoxifen. However, elacestrant possesses a novel site of attachment. As such, we hypothesized that elacestrant adopts an alternative binding orientation in the ERα ligand binding pocket to achieve its unique pharmaceutical profiles. Methods: X-ray crystallography was used to solve a co-crystal structure of elacestrant in complex with WT ERα ligand binding domain to 2Å. Results: Overall, elacestrant promotes the formation of a canonical ERα ligand binding domain antagonist conformation, whereby helix 12 (H12) is docked into the activating function-2 cleft. However, elacestrant adopts a novel vector in the ERα ligand binding pocket that places it in close proximity to helix 12. As a result, it forms a bifurcated hydrogen bond that is not observed in other competitive antiestrogens and samples a chemical space known to increase H12 mobility and induce SERD activity. This novel vector also places it near positions 537 and 538, the two most common sites of somatic mutation. Conclusions: The high-resolution x-ray crystal structure of elacestrant suggests that the unique binding mode it adopts enables novel pharmacology and positions it to achieve potency in the WT and activating somatic ERα mutated breast cancer setting.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean W. Fanning ◽  
Rinath Jeselsohn ◽  
Venkatasubramanian Dharmarajan ◽  
Christopher G. Mayne ◽  
Mostafa Karimi ◽  
...  

AbstractAcquired resistance to endocrine therapy remains a significant clinical burden for breast cancer patients. Somatic mutations in theESR1(estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) gene ligand-binding domain (LBD) represent a recognized mechanism of acquired resistance. Antiestrogens with improved efficacy versus tamoxifen might overcome the resistant phenotype in ER+ breast cancers. Bazedoxifene (BZA) is a potent antiestrogen that is clinically approved for use in hormone replacement therapies. We find BZA possesses improved inhibitory potency against the Y537S and D538G ERα mutants compared to tamoxifen and has additional inhibitory activity in combination with the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. In addition, comprehensive biophysical and structural biology studies show that BZA’s selective estrogen receptor degrading (SERD) properties that override the stabilizing effects of the Y537S and D538G ERα mutations.SignificanceBazedoxifene (BZA) is a potent orally available antiestrogen that is clinically approved for use in hormone replacement therapy (DUAVEE). We explore the efficacy of BZA to inhibit activating somatic mutants of ERα that can arise in metastatic breast cancers after prolonged exposure to aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen therapy. Breast cancer cell line, biophysical, and structural data show that BZA disrupts helix 12 of the ERα ligand binding domain to achieve improved potency against Y537S and D538G somatic mutants compared to 4-hydroxytamoxifen.



2004 ◽  
Vol 385 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Przibilla ◽  
W. W. Hitchcock ◽  
M. Szécsi ◽  
M. Grebe ◽  
J. Beatty ◽  
...  

AbstractThe functional insect ecdysteroid receptor is comprised of the ecdysone receptor (EcR) and Ultraspiracle (USP). The ligand-binding domain (LBD) of USP was fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain (GAL4-DBD) and characterized by analyzing the effect of site-directed mutations in the LBD. Normal and mutant proteins were tested for ligand and DNA binding, dimerization, and their ability to induce gene expression. The presence of helix 12 proved to be essential for DNA binding and was necessary to confer efficient ecdysteroid binding to the heterodimer with the EcR (LBD), but did not influence dimerization. The antagonistic position of helix 12 is indispensible for interaction between the fusion protein and DNA, whereas hormone binding to the EcR (LBD) was only partially reduced if fixation of helix 12 was disturbed. The mutation of amino acids, which presumably bind to a fatty acid evoked a profound negative influence on transactivation ability, although enhanced transactivation potency and ligand binding to the ecdysteroid receptor was impaired to varying degrees by mutation of these residues. Mutations of one fatty acidbinding residue within the ligand-binding pocket, I323, however, evoked enhanced transactivation. The results confirmed that the LBD of Ultraspiracle modifies ecdysteroid receptor function through intermolecular interactions and demonstrated that the ligand-binding pocket of USP modifies the DNA-binding and transactivation abilities of the fusion protein.



2020 ◽  
Vol 180 (3) ◽  
pp. 623-623
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Gonzalez ◽  
Molly Hancock ◽  
Siqi Sun ◽  
Christina L. Gersch ◽  
Jose M. Larios ◽  
...  


ChemBioChem ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (16) ◽  
pp. 2251-2254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Möcklinghoff ◽  
Rolf Rose ◽  
Maëlle Carraz ◽  
Arie Visser ◽  
Christian Ottmann ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Min ◽  
Jerome C. Nwachukwu ◽  
Sathish Srinivasan ◽  
Erumbi S. Rangarajan ◽  
Charles C. Nettles ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTTamoxifen and fulvestrant are currently two major approved estrogen receptor-α (ER)-targeted therapies for breast cancer, but resistance to their antagonistic actions often develops. Efforts to improve ER-targeted therapies have relied upon a single mechanism, where ligands with a single side chain on the ligand core that extends outward from the ligand binding pocket to directly displace helix (h)12 in the ER ligand-binding domain (LBD), blocking the LBD interaction with transcriptional coactivators that drive proliferation. Here, we describe ER inhibitors that block estrogen-induced proliferation through two distinct structural mechanisms by combining a side chain for direct antagonism with a bulky chemical group that causes indirect antagonism by distorting structural epitopes inside the ligand binding pocket. These dual-mechanism ER inhibitors (DMERIs) fully antagonize the proliferation of wild type ER-positive breast cancer cells and cells that have become resistant to tamoxifen and fulvestrant through activating ER mutations and de novo mechanisms such as overactive growth factor signaling. Conformational probing studies highlight marked differences that distinguish the dual mechanism inhibitors from current standard of care single-mechanism antiestrogens, and crystallographic analyses reveal that they disrupt the positioning of h11 and h12 in multiple ways. Combining two chemical targeting approaches into a single ligand thus provides a flexible platform for next generation ER-targeted therapies.



2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (31) ◽  
pp. 6063-6071
Author(s):  
Ranju Pokhrel ◽  
Tang Tang ◽  
Justin M. Holub

Fluorescent labeling coupled with bipartite tetracysteine display enables the surveillance of ligand-mediated helix 12 transitions within the estrogen receptor α ligand-binding domain.



2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 1231-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Jasuja ◽  
Jagadish Ulloor ◽  
Christopher M. Yengo ◽  
Karen Choong ◽  
Andrei Y. Istomin ◽  
...  

Abstract Ligand-induced conformational perturbations in androgen receptor (AR) are important in coactivator recruitment and transactivation. However, molecular rearrangements in AR ligand-binding domain (AR-LBD) associated with agonist binding and their kinetic and thermodynamic parameters are poorly understood. We used steady-state second-derivative absorption and emission spectroscopy, pressure and temperature perturbations, and 4,4′-bis-anilinonaphthalene 8-sulfonate (bis-ANS) partitioning to determine the kinetics and thermodynamics of the conformational changes in AR-LBD after dihydrotestosterone (DHT) binding. In presence of DHT, the second-derivative absorption spectrum showed a red shift and a change in peak-to-peak distance. Emission intensity increased upon DHT binding, and center of spectral mass was blue shifted, denoting conformational changes resulting in more hydrophobic environment for tyrosines and tryptophans within a more compact DHT-bound receptor. In pressure perturbation calorimetry, DHT-induced energetic stabilization increased the Gibbs free energy of unfolding to 8.4 ± 1.3 kcal/mol from 3.5 ± 1.6 kcal/mol. Bis-ANS partitioning studies revealed that upon DHT binding, AR-LBD underwent biphasic rearrangement with a high activation energy (13.4 kcal/mol). An initial, molten globule-like burst phase (k ∼30 sec−1) with greater solvent accessibility was followed by rearrangement (k ∼0.01 sec−1), leading to a more compact conformation than apo-AR-LBD. Molecular simulations demonstrated unique sensitivity of tyrosine and tryptophan residues during pressure unfolding with rearrangement of residues in the coactivator recruitment surfaces distant from the ligand-binding pocket. In conclusion, DHT binding leads to energetic stabilization of AR-LBD domain and substantial rearrangement of residues distant from the ligand-binding pocket. DHT binding to AR-LBD involves biphasic receptor rearrangement including population of a molten globule-like intermediate state.



2020 ◽  
Vol 180 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Gonzalez ◽  
Molly Hancock ◽  
Siqi Sun ◽  
Christina L. Gersch ◽  
Jose M. Larios ◽  
...  


2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 3349-3352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Biggadike ◽  
Randy K. Bledsoe ◽  
Anne M. Hassell ◽  
Barrie E. Kirk ◽  
Iain M. McLay ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document