scholarly journals Spatial frequency tuning of perceptual learning and transfer in global motion

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi M Asher ◽  
Vincenzo Romei ◽  
Paul B Hibbard
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Perceptual Learning ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Training Transfer ◽  
Global Motion ◽  
Motion Condition ◽  
Motion Coherence ◽  
Low Pass ◽  
Increased Sensitivity

AbstractPerceptual learning is typically highly specific to the stimuli and task used during training. However, recently it has been shown that training on global motion can transfer to untrained tasks, reflecting the generalising properties of mechanisms at this level of processing. We investigated a) if feedback was required for learning when using an equivalent noise global motion coherence task, and b) the transfer across spatial frequency of training on a global motion coherence task, and the transfer of this training to a measure of contrast sensitivity. For our first experiment two groups, with and without feedback, trained for ten days on a broadband global motion coherence task. Results indicated that feedback was a requirement for learning. For the second experiment training consisted of five days of direction discrimination on one of three global motion tasks (broadband, low or high frequency random-dot Gabors), with trial-by-trial auditory feedback. A pre- and post-training assessment was also conducted, consisting of all three types of global motion stimuli (without feedback) and high and low spatial frequency contrast sensitivity. We predicted that if learning and transfer is cortically localised, then transfer would show specificity to the area processing the task (global motion). In this case, we would predict a broad transfer between spatial frequency conditions of global motion only. However, if transfer occurred as a result of backward generalisation, a more selective transfer would occur matching the low-pass broadband tuning of the area processing global motion. Our training paradigm was successful at eliciting improvement in the trained tasks over the five days. However, post-training transfer to trained or untrained tasks was only reported for the low spatial frequency trained group. This group exhibited increased sensitivity to low spatial frequency contrast, and an improvement for the broadband global motion condition. Our findings suggest that the feedback projections from global to local stages of processing play a role in transfer.

scholarly journals Spatial Frequency Tuning and Transfer of Perceptual Learning for Motion Coherence Reflects the Tuning Properties of Global Motion Processing

Vision ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi Asher ◽  
Vincenzo Romei ◽  
Paul Hibbard
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Perceptual Learning ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Global Motion ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
Motion Coherence

Perceptual learning is typically highly specific to the stimuli and task used during training. However, recently, it has been shown that training on global motion can transfer to untrained tasks, reflecting the generalising properties of mechanisms at this level of processing. We investigated (i) if feedback was required for learning in a motion coherence task, (ii) the transfer across the spatial frequency of training on a global motion coherence task and (iii) the transfer of this training to a measure of contrast sensitivity. For our first experiment, two groups, with and without feedback, trained for ten days on a broadband motion coherence task. Results indicated that feedback was a requirement for robust learning. For the second experiment, training consisted of five days of direction discrimination using one of three motion coherence stimuli (where individual elements were comprised of either broadband Gaussian blobs or low- or high-frequency random-dot Gabor patches), with trial-by-trial auditory feedback. A pre- and post-training assessment was conducted for each of the three types of global motion coherence conditions and high and low spatial frequency contrast sensitivity (both without feedback). Our training paradigm was successful at eliciting improvement in the trained tasks over the five days. Post-training assessments found evidence of transfer for the motion coherence task exclusively for the group trained on low spatial frequency elements. For the contrast sensitivity tasks, improved performance was observed for low- and high-frequency stimuli, following motion coherence training with broadband stimuli, and for low-frequency stimuli, following low-frequency training. Our findings are consistent with perceptual learning, which depends on the global stage of motion processing in higher cortical areas, which is broadly tuned for spatial frequency, with a preference for low frequencies.

scholarly journals Neuronal basis of perceptual learning in striate cortex

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Ren ◽  
Jiawei Zhou ◽  
Zhimo Yao ◽  
Zhengchun Wang ◽  
Nini Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Perceptual Learning ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Striate Cortex ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
High Spatial Frequency ◽  
Sensitivity Training ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Cortex Area ◽  
Adult Cats

Abstract It is well known that, in humans, contrast sensitivity training at high spatial frequency (SF) not only leads to contrast sensitivity improvement, but also results in an improvement in visual acuity as assessed with gratings (direct effect) or letters (transfer effect). However, the underlying neural mechanisms of this high spatial frequency training improvement remain to be elucidated. In the present study, we examined four properties of neurons in primary visual cortex (area 17) of adult cats that exhibited significantly improved acuity after contrast sensitivity training with a high spatial frequency grating and those of untrained control cats. We found no difference in neuronal contrast sensitivity or tuning width (Width) between the trained and untrained cats. However, the trained cats showed a displacement of the cells’ optimal spatial frequency (OSF) to higher spatial frequencies as well as a larger neuronal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Furthermore, both the neuronal differences in OSF and SNR were significantly correlated with the improvement of acuity measured behaviorally. These results suggest that striate neurons might mediate the perceptual learning-induced improvement for high spatial frequency stimuli by an alteration in their spatial frequency representation and by an increased SNR.

Temporal and Spatial Frequency Tuning of the Flicker Motion Aftereffect

Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
P J Bex ◽  
F A J Verstraten ◽  
I Mareschal
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Motion Aftereffect ◽  
Sine Wave ◽  
Test Grating ◽  
Spatial Frequency Tuning ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Low Pass ◽  
Sine Wave Gratings

The motion aftereffect (MAE) was used to study the temporal-frequency and spatial-frequency selectivity of the visual system at suprathreshold contrasts. Observers adapted to drifting sine-wave gratings of a range of spatial and temporal frequencies. The magnitude of the MAE induced by the adaptation was measured with counterphasing test gratings of a variety of spatial and temporal frequencies. Independently of the spatial or temporal frequency of the adapting grating, the largest MAE was found with slowly counterphasing test gratings (∼0.125 – 0.25 Hz). For slowly counterphasing test gratings (<∼2 Hz), the largest MAEs were found when the test grating was of similar spatial frequency to that of the adapting grating, even at very low spatial frequencies (0.125 cycle deg−1). However, such narrow spatial frequency tuning was lost when the temporal frequency of the test grating was increased. The data suggest that MAEs are dominated by a single, low-pass temporal-frequency mechanism and by a series of band-pass spatial-frequency mechanisms at low temporal frequencies. At higher test temporal frequencies, the loss of spatial-frequency tuning implicates separate mechanisms with broader spatial frequency tuning.

Spatial Integration of Objectively Equiluminous Chromatic Gratings

Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 200-200
Author(s):  
M I Kankaanpää ◽  
J Rovamo ◽  
H T Kukkonen ◽  
J Hallikainen
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Spatial Integration ◽  
Chromatic Contrast ◽  
Shape Difference ◽  
Sensitivity Functions ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Low Pass ◽  
Chromatic Aberrations ◽  
Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity

Contrast sensitivity functions for achromatic and chromatic gratings tend to be band-pass and low-pass in shape, respectively. Our aim was to test whether spatial integration contributes to the shape difference found at low spatial frequencies. We measured binocular chromatic contrast sensitivity as a function of grating area for objectively equiluminous red - green and blue - yellow chromatic gratings. Chromatic contrast refers to the Michelson contrast of either of the two chromatic component gratings presented in counterphase against the combined background. Grating area ( A) varied from 1 to 256 square cycles ( Af2) at spatial frequencies ( f) of 0.125 – 4.0 cycles deg−1. We used only horizontal gratings at low and medium spatial frequencies to minimise the transverse and longitudinal chromatic aberrations due to ocular optics. At all spatial frequencies studied, chromatic contrast sensitivity increased with grating area. Ac was found to be constant at low spatial frequencies (0.125 – 0.5 cycles deg−1) but decreased in inverse proportion to increasing spatial frequency at 1 – 4 cycles deg−1. Thus, spatial integration depends similarly on spatial frequency for achromatic (Luntinen et al, 1995 Vision Research35 2339 – 2346) and chromatic gratings, and differences in spatial integration do not contribute to the shape difference of the respective contrast sensitivity functions.

scholarly journals Perceptual learning and the spatial frequency tuning of the perceptual template

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 558
Author(s):  
Barbara Dosher ◽  
Zhong-Lin Lu ◽  
Nathaniel Blair
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Perceptual Learning ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Spatial Frequency Tuning

Binocular interactions in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. I. Spatial-frequency analysis of responses of X, Y, and W cells to nondominant-eye stimulation

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 526-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Guido ◽  
N. Tumosa ◽  
P. D. Spear
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Discharge Rate ◽  
Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Low Pass ◽  
Band Pass ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Y Cells ◽  
Dorsal Lateral Geniculate

1. X, Y, and W cells in the A and C layers of the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) were tested for responses to stimulation of the nondominant eye. The main purpose was to determine the incidence of nondominant-eye excitation and inhibition among different classes of cells and to examine the spatial-frequency tuning of responses to the nondominant eye. 2. Of 198 cells that were tested with drifting sine-wave gratings presented to the nondominant eye, 109 (55%) showed statistically significant responses. Four types of responses were observed: an increase in the mean discharge rate (F0 excitation), a decrease in the mean discharge rate (F0 inhibition), an increased modulation at the fundamental frequency of the grating (F1 excitation), and a decreased modulation at the fundamental frequency of the grating (F1 inhibition). Overall, 29% of the cells responded with inhibition, 24% responded with excitation, and 2% showed both excitation and inhibition, depending upon the spatial frequency and/or the harmonic response component. The relative incidence of excitation and inhibition was similar for X, Y, and W cells, for cells with on-center and off-center receptive fields, for cells with different receptive-field eccentricities, and for cells in each LGN layer. In addition, within layers A and A1, responses were similar for cells at different distances from the laminar borders. 3. Spatial-frequency response functions indicated that cells could have band-pass or low-pass spatial-frequency tuning through the nondominant eye. Band-pass cells tended to be narrowly tuned (less than or equal to 1 octave), and low-pass cells responded to a broader range of spatial frequencies. These properties were similar for X, Y, and W cells. Spatial resolution tended to be low (less than or equal to 0.8 c/deg for most cells), although a few cells responded to the highest spatial frequency tested (5.4 c/deg). Likewise, optimal spatial frequency was low (less than or equal to 0.2 c/deg) for most cells. These properties were similar for X and Y cells, and there was a weak tendency for X and Y cells to have higher optimal spatial frequencies and spatial resolutions than W cells. 4. In terms of absolute change in activity, responses to drifting gratings were weak. However, cells that were inhibited generally showed 20-60% decreases in activity to the optimal spatial frequency, and cells that were excited generally showed 40-100% increases. Response amplitudes were similar for X, Y, and W cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Spatial Frequency tuning functions and Contrast Sensitivity at Different Eccentricities in the Visual Field

Biomag 96 ◽  
2000 ◽  
pp. 725-728
Author(s):  
H.-W. Chen ◽  
C. J. Aine ◽  
E. R. Flynn ◽  
C. C. Wood
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Spatial Frequency Tuning

Behavioral determination of the spatial selectivity of contrast adaptation in cats: Some evidence for a common plan in the mammmlian visual system

1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (05) ◽  
pp. 413-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Berkley
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Striate Cortex ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Spatial Vision ◽  
Adaptation Effect ◽  
Test Grating ◽  
Contrast Adaptation ◽  
Visual Systems ◽  
Spatial Frequencies

AbstractAn aftereffects paradigm was used to behaviorally measure contrast sensitivity of cats to gratings of three different test spatial frequencies after adaptation to gratings of various spatial frequencies, contrasts, and durations. Post-adaptation reductions in sensitivity occurred even after short periods of adaptation (&lt;7 s) and could be as large as 1.0 log unit under some conditions. The magnitude of the adaptation effect varied monotonically with (1) adaptation grating contrast, (2) duration, and (3) the contrast sensitivity for the test grating. Average half-width (at half-height) of the spatial-frequency tuning curves constructed from the data was 1.4 octaves, and was not dependent upon the level of adaptation or the spatial frequency of the test grating. Post-adaptation psychometric functions of the cats showed reduced slopes and maxima suggesting that, unlike humans, in cats apparent contrast grows more slowly with increases in physical contrast after contrast adaptation. All of the characteristics observed are in excellent agreement with electrophysiologically measured properties of neurons in striate cortex of cats. In addition, there was a remarkable similarity of the cat tuning functions, both in shape and bandpass, to those measured in man with a similar paradigm suggesting that (1) the two visual systems are sufficiently similar to make the cat a useful spatial vision model and (2) there is a common functional plan to all mammalian visual systems despite significant anatomical differences between species.

Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Speech With and Without Contralateral Hearing: Implications for Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Martin Chavant ◽  
Alexis Hervais-Adelman ◽  
Olivier Macherey
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Perceptual Learning ◽  
Speech Signal ◽  
Training Phase ◽  
Monosyllabic Words ◽  
Low Pass ◽  
Contralateral Ear ◽  
Number Of Individuals ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Vocoded Speech

Purpose An increasing number of individuals with residual or even normal contralateral hearing are being considered for cochlear implantation. It remains unknown whether the presence of contralateral hearing is beneficial or detrimental to their perceptual learning of cochlear implant (CI)–processed speech. The aim of this experiment was to provide a first insight into this question using acoustic simulations of CI processing. Method Sixty normal-hearing listeners took part in an auditory perceptual learning experiment. Each subject was randomly assigned to one of three groups of 20 referred to as NORMAL, LOWPASS, and NOTHING. The experiment consisted of two test phases separated by a training phase. In the test phases, all subjects were tested on recognition of monosyllabic words passed through a six-channel “PSHC” vocoder presented to a single ear. In the training phase, which consisted of listening to a 25-min audio book, all subjects were also presented with the same vocoded speech in one ear but the signal they received in their other ear differed across groups. The NORMAL group was presented with the unprocessed speech signal, the LOWPASS group with a low-pass filtered version of the speech signal, and the NOTHING group with no sound at all. Results The improvement in speech scores following training was significantly smaller for the NORMAL than for the LOWPASS and NOTHING groups. Conclusions This study suggests that the presentation of normal speech in the contralateral ear reduces or slows down perceptual learning of vocoded speech but that an unintelligible low-pass filtered contralateral signal does not have this effect. Potential implications for the rehabilitation of CI patients with partial or full contralateral hearing are discussed.

Role of intrathalamic inhibition on the spatial frequency tuning of neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat

2009 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. S106
Author(s):  
Akihiro Kimura ◽  
Satoshi Shimegi ◽  
Shin-ichiro Hara ◽  
Masahiro Okamoto ◽  
Hiromichi Sato
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Spatial Frequency Tuning ◽  
Lateral Geniculate
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document