scholarly journals Interpretation of ‘Omics dynamics in a single subject using local estimates of dispersion between two transcriptomes

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qike Li ◽  
Samir Rachid Zaim ◽  
Dillon Aberasturi ◽  
Joanne Berghout ◽  
Haiquan Li ◽  
...  

AbstractCalculating Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) from RNA-sequencing requires replicates to estimate gene-wise variability, infeasible in clinics. By imposing restrictive transcriptome-wide assumptions limiting inferential opportunities of conventional methods (edgeR, NOISeq-sim, DESeq, DEGseq), comparing two conditions without replicates (TCWR) has been proposed, but not evaluated. Under TCWR conditions (e.g., unaffected tissue vs. tumor), differences of transformed expression of the proposed individualized DEG (iDEG) method follow a distribution calculated across a local partition of related transcripts at baseline expression; thereafter the probability of each DEG is estimated by empirical Bayes with local false discovery rate control using a two-group mixture model. In extensive simulation studies of TCWR methods, iDEG and NOISeq are more accurate at 5%<DEGs<20% (precision>90%, recall>75%, false_positive_rate<1%) and 30%<DEGs<40% (precision=recall∼90%), respectively.The proposed iDEG method borrows localized distribution information from the same individual, a strategy that improves accuracy to compare transcriptomes in absence of replicates at low DEGs conditions. http://www.lussiergroup.org/publications/iDEG

Metabolites ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Shin June Kim ◽  
Youngjae Oh ◽  
Jaesik Jeong

Due to the advance in technology, the type of data is getting more complicated and large-scale. To analyze such complex data, more advanced technique is required. In case of omics data from two different groups, it is interesting to find significant biomarkers between two groups while controlling error rate such as false discovery rate (FDR). Over the last few decades, a lot of methods that control local false discovery rate have been developed, ranging from one-dimensional to k-dimensional FDR procedure. For comparison study, we select three of them, which have unique and significant properties: Efron’s approach, Ploner’s approach, and Kim’s approach in chronological order. The first approach is one-dimensional approach while the other two are two-dimensional ones. Furthermore, we consider two more variants of Ploner’s approach. We compare the performance of those methods on both simulated and real data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document