scholarly journals Single-molecule imaging of DNA gyrase activity in livingEscherichia coli

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathew Stracy ◽  
Adam J.M. Wollman ◽  
Elzbieta Kaja ◽  
Jacek Gapinski ◽  
Ji-Eun Lee ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBacterial DNA gyrase introduces negative supercoils into chromosomal DNA and relaxes positive supercoils introduced by replication and transiently by transcription. Removal of these positive supercoils is essential for replication fork progression and for the overall unlinking of the two duplex DNA strands, as well as for ongoing transcription. To address how gyrase copes with these topological challenges, we used high-speed single-molecule fluorescence imaging in liveEscherichia colicells. We demonstrate that at least 300 gyrase molecules are stably bound to the chromosome at any time, with ∼12 enzymes enriched near each replication fork. Trapping of reaction intermediates with ciprofloxacin revealed complexes undergoing catalysis. Dwell times of ∼2 s were observed for the dispersed gyrase molecules, which we propose maintain steady-state levels of negative supercoiling of the chromosome. In contrast, the dwell time of replisome-proximal molecules was ∼8 s, consistent with these catalyzing processive positive supercoil relaxation in front of the progressing replisome.

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 2206-2211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes M. Cordonnier ◽  
Alan R. Lehmann ◽  
Robert P. P. Fuchs

ABSTRACT Xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XPV) cells are characterized by a cellular defect in the ability to synthesize intact daughter DNA strands on damaged templates. Molecular mechanisms that facilitate replication fork progression on damaged DNA in normal cells are not well defined. In this study, we used single-stranded plasmid molecules containing a single N-2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF) adduct to analyze translesion synthesis (TLS) catalyzed by extracts of either normal or XPV primary skin fibroblasts. In one of the substrates, the single AAF adduct was located at the 3′ end of a run of three guanines that was previously shown to induce deletion of one G by a slippage mechanism. Primer extension reactions performed by normal cellular extracts from four different individuals produced the same distinct pattern of TLS, with over 80% of the products resulting from the elongation of a slipped intermediate and the remaining 20% resulting from a nonslipped intermediate. In contrast, with cellular extracts from five different XPV patients, the TLS reaction was strongly reduced, yielding only low amounts of TLS via the nonslipped intermediate. With our second substrate, in which the AAF adduct was located at the first G in the run, thus preventing slippage from occurring, we confirmed that normal extracts were able to perform TLS 10-fold more efficiently than XPV extracts. These data demonstrate unequivocally that the defect in XPV cells resides in translesion synthesis independently of the slippage process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (38) ◽  
pp. eabc0330 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. T. Gruszka ◽  
S. Xie ◽  
H. Kimura ◽  
H. Yardimci

During replication, nucleosomes are disrupted ahead of the replication fork, followed by their reassembly on daughter strands from the pool of recycled parental and new histones. However, because no previous studies have managed to capture the moment that replication forks encounter nucleosomes, the mechanism of recycling has remained unclear. Here, through real-time single-molecule visualization of replication fork progression in Xenopus egg extracts, we determine explicitly the outcome of fork collisions with nucleosomes. Most of the parental histones are evicted from the DNA, with histone recycling, nucleosome sliding, and replication fork stalling also occurring but at lower frequencies. Critically, we find that local histone recycling becomes dominant upon depletion of endogenous histones from extracts, revealing that free histone concentration is a key modulator of parental histone dynamics at the replication fork. The mechanistic details revealed by these studies have major implications for our understanding of epigenetic inheritance.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yilai Li ◽  
Ziyuan Chen ◽  
Lindsay A. Matthews ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons ◽  
Julie S. Biteen

AbstractThe replisome is the multi-protein complex responsible for faithful replication of chromosomal DNA. Using single-molecule super-resolution imaging, we characterized the dynamics of three replisomal proteins in liveBacillus subtiliscells: the two replicative DNA polymerases, PolC and DnaE, and a processivity clamp loader subunit, DnaX. We quantified the protein mobility and dwell times during normal replication and following both damage-independent and damage-dependent replication fork stress. With these results, we report the dynamic and cooperative process of DNA replication based on changes in the measured diffusion coefficients and dwell times. These experiments show that the replisomal proteins are all highly dynamic and that the exchange rate depends on whether DNA synthesis is active or arrested. Our results also suggest coupling between PolC and DnaX in the DNA replication process, and indicate that DnaX provides an important role in synthesis during repair. Furthermore, our results show that DnaE provides a limited contribution to chromosomal replication and repair.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey Whinn ◽  
Gurleen Kaur ◽  
Jacob S. Lewis ◽  
Grant Schauer ◽  
Stefan Müller ◽  
...  

DNA replication occurs on chromosomal DNA while processes such as DNA repair, recombination and transcription continue. However, we have limited experimental tools to study the consequences of collisions between DNA-bound molecular machines. Here, we repurpose a catalytically inactivated Cas9 (dCas9) construct fused to the photo-stable dL5 protein fluoromodule as a novel, targetable protein-DNA roadblock for studying replication fork arrest at the single-molecule level in vitro as well as in vivo. We find that the specifically bound dCas9–guideRNA complex arrests viral, bacterial and eukaryotic replication forks in vitro.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Guilliam

The eukaryotic replisome coordinates template unwinding and nascent-strand synthesis to drive DNA replication fork progression and complete efficient genome duplication. During its advancement along the parental template, each replisome may encounter an array of obstacles including damaged and structured DNA that impede its progression and threaten genome stability. A number of mechanisms exist to permit replisomes to overcome such obstacles, maintain their progression, and prevent fork collapse. A combination of recent advances in structural, biochemical, and single-molecule approaches have illuminated the architecture of the replisome during unperturbed replication, rationalised the impact of impediments to fork progression, and enhanced our understanding of DNA damage tolerance mechanisms and their regulation. This review focusses on these studies to provide an updated overview of the mechanisms that support replisomes to maintain their progression on an imperfect template.


Author(s):  
Claire Breslin ◽  
Paula M. Clements ◽  
Sherif F. El‐Khamisy ◽  
Eva Petermann ◽  
Natasha Iles ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Sun

ABSTRACT To prevent replication failure due to fork barriers, several mechanisms have evolved to restart arrested forks independent of the origin of replication. Our understanding of these mechanisms that underlie replication reactivation has been aided through unique dynamic perspectives offered by single-molecule techniques. These techniques, such as optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers, and fluorescence-based methods, allow researchers to monitor the unwinding of DNA by helicase, nucleotide incorporation during polymerase synthesis, and replication fork progression in real time. In addition, they offer the ability to distinguish DNA intermediates after obstacles to replication at high spatial and temporal resolutions, providing new insights into the replication reactivation mechanisms. These and other highlights of single-molecule techniques and remarkable studies on the recovery of the replication fork from barriers will be discussed in this review.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document