scholarly journals Correlation between Serum Kisspeptin and Spermatogenic Function in Men

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongling Yu ◽  
Jin Liu ◽  
Yilong Han ◽  
Chao Chen ◽  
Fanwei Meng
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Concentration ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Luteinizing Hormones ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve Analysis ◽  
Sperm Aspiration ◽  
Testicular Sperm Aspiration ◽  
Qilu Hospital ◽  
Group B

AbstractKisspeptin along with its receptor GPR54 or KISS1R regulates the secretion of hormones involved in the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis, which is one of the contributing factors of adolescent spermatogenesis. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between serum kisspeptin concentration and spermatogenic function, and its predictive value in azoospermia. We retrospectively analyzed data of 196 males who visited the Reproductive Medicine Center of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from June–November 2018; 20 were fertile and 176 were infertile. The following semen tests were performed: serum kisspeptin level by enzyme immunoassay; and levels of follicle-stimulating and luteinizing hormones, and testosterone by chemiluminescence assay. Percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration was performed on males with azoospermia. Subjects were divided into 5 groups: azoospermia (group A: 22 men with obstructive azoospermia; group B: 54 men with non-obstructive azoospermia), oligospermia (group C: 56 men), infertility with normal semen concentration (group D: 44 men), and fertility with normal semen concentration (group E: 20 men). Kisspeptin levels in the fertile group were higher than those in the infertile group. Levels of serum hormones, testosterone, and kisspeptin correlated with sperm concentration, with the strongest correlation between kisspeptin and sperm concentration (correlation coefficient=0.692). Levels of kisspeptin in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia groups were analyzed using Receiver-Operating-Curve analysis. A serum kisspeptin level ≥80.655 was classified as obstructive azoospermia; otherwise, the classification was non-obstructive azoospermia. Serum kisspeptin levels in the fertility group were significantly higher than that in the infertility group; this suggests kisspeptin may be associated with male fertility. Moreover, kisspeptin had a stronger correlation with sperm concentration than the hormones. A serum kisspeptin level of 80.655 can be used to differentiate obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia.

scholarly journals Endocrine Tests and/or Testicular Volume Are Not Predictive of Successful Sperm Retrieval by Multiple Testicular Sperm Extraction in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minh Tam Le ◽  
Thanh Tam Thi Nguyen ◽  
Dac Nguyen Nguyen ◽  
Nhu Quynh Thi Tran ◽  
Quoc Huy Vu Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Testicular Volume ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Sperm Aspiration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Testicular Sperm Aspiration

Abstract Objectives: This study aimed to determine the role of pre-surgical markers in the prediction of sperm retrieval in infertile Vietnamese men with azoospermia. Patients and Methods:Retrospective descriptive analysis of 136 infertile men with azoospermia, examined from August 2014 to July 2018. Patients underwent stepwise surgical sperm retrieval via percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration, testicular sperm aspiration then multiple testicular sperm extraction in up to 3 locations until sperm were detected. Factorswere analyzed to determine the prediction of sperm retrieval.Results: The overall success rate of sperm retrieval was 49.3% including 88.3% and 18.4% in the OA and NOA group, respectively. The results of sperm retrieval were significantly associated only with the OA and NOA group, not with endocrine test or testicular volume. We found no significant difference in the endocrine test and testicular volume’s result between successful and unsuccessful sperm retrieval in either group.Conclusions: Neither an endocrine test nor testicular volume should be used for predicting the results of surgical sperm retrieval in infertile Vietnamese males with azoospermia.

Efficiency of testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) to recover spermatozoa in non-obstructive azoospermia

2004 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. S136 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bibancos ◽  
A. Iaconelli ◽  
L.G. Maldonado ◽  
L.M. Rossi ◽  
T.C. Bonetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Sperm Aspiration ◽  
Testicular Sperm Aspiration

scholarly journals Microfluidic Systems for Isolation of Spermatozoa from Testicular Specimens of Non-Obstructive Azoospermic Men: Does/Can It Improve Sperm Yield?

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3667
Author(s):  
Gary D. Smith ◽  
Clementina Cantatore ◽  
Dana A. Ohl
Keyword(s):  
Assisted Reproductive Technologies ◽  
Reproductive Technologies ◽  
Initial Time ◽  
Seminiferous Tubules ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Testicular Sperm ◽  
Laboratory Techniques ◽  
Sperm Aspiration ◽  
Testicular Sperm Aspiration

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has allowed reproduction options through assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) for men with no spermatozoa within the ejaculate (azoospermia). In men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), the options for spermatozoa retrieval are testicular sperm extraction (TESE), testicular sperm aspiration (TESA), or micro-surgical sperm extraction (microTESE). At the initial time of spermatozoa removal from the testis, spermatozoa are immobile. Independent of the means of spermatozoa retrieval, the subsequent steps of removing spermatozoa from seminiferous tubules, determining spermatozoa viability, identifying enough spermatozoa for oocyte injections, and isolating viable spermatozoa for injection are currently performed manually by laboratory microscopic dissection and collection. These laboratory techniques are highly labor-intensive, with yield unknown, have an unpredictable efficiency and/or success rate, and are subject to inter-laboratory personnel and intra-laboratory variability. Here, we consider the potential utility, benefits, and shortcomings of developing technologies such as motility induction/stimulants, microfluidics, dielectrophoresis, and cell sorting as andrological laboratory add-ons to reduce the technical burdens and variabilities in viable spermatozoa isolation from testicular samples in men with NOA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document