Chiral versus racemic building blocks in supramolecular chemistry: tartrate salts of organic diamines
In the 1:1 adducts C12H10N2·C4H6O6 formed between 1,2-bis(4′-pyridyl)ethene and racemic tartaric acid [(I), triclinic P\bar 1, Z′ = 1] and (2R,3R)-tartaric acid [(II), triclinic P1, Z′ = 2], the ionic components are linked by hard hydrogen bonds into single sheets, which are further linked by C—H...O hydrogen bonds. In the analogous adducts C10H18N2·C4H6O6 formed by 4,4′-bipyridyl with racemic tartaric acid [(III), triclinic P\bar 1, Z′ = 1] and the chiral acid [(IV), monoclinic P21, Z′ = 1], the hard hydrogen bonds generate bilayers which are again linked by C—H...O hydrogen bonds. Piperazine forms a 1:1 salt [{(C4H10N2)H2}2+]·[(C4H4O6)2−] with (2R,3R)-tartaric acid [(V), monoclinic P21] sheets, which are linked by the cations to form a pillared-layer framework. In each of the 1:2 salts formed by racemic tartaric acid with piperazine [(VI), monoclinic P21/n, Z′ = 0.5] and 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) [(VII), monoclinic P21/n, Z′ = 0.5], the cation lies across a centre of inversion, with the [{HN(CH2CH2)3NH}2+] cation disordered over two sets of sites: in both (VI) and (VII) the anions form a three-dimensional framework encapsulating large voids which accommodate the cations. The salt formed between DABCO and (2R,3R)-tartaric acid [(VIII), orthorhombic P212121, Z′ = 1] has 3:4 stoichiometry and contains four different types of ion, [{HN(CH2CH2)3NH}2+]2·[N(CH2CH2)3NH]+·3(C4H5O6)−·C4H4O6 2−: the hard hydrogen bonds generate a three-dimensional framework.