scholarly journals Raoult's law revisited: accurately predicting equilibrium relative humidity points for humidity control experiments

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 631-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Bowler ◽  
David R. Bowler ◽  
Matthew W. Bowler

The humidity surrounding a sample is an important variable in scientific experiments. Biological samples in particular require not just a humid atmosphere but often a relative humidity (RH) that is in equilibrium with a stabilizing solution required to maintain the sample in the same state during measurements. The controlled dehydration of macromolecular crystals can lead to significant increases in crystal order, leading to higher diffraction quality. Devices that can accurately control the humidity surrounding crystals while monitoring diffraction have led to this technique being increasingly adopted, as the experiments become easier and more reproducible. Matching the RH to the mother liquor is the first step in allowing the stable mounting of a crystal. In previous work [Wheeler, Russi, Bowler & Bowler (2012). Acta Cryst. F68, 111–114], the equilibrium RHs were measured for a range of concentrations of the most commonly used precipitants in macromolecular crystallography and it was shown how these related to Raoult's law for the equilibrium vapour pressure of water above a solution. However, a discrepancy between the measured values and those predicted by theory could not be explained. Here, a more precise humidity control device has been used to determine equilibrium RH points. The new results are in agreement with Raoult's law. A simple argument in statistical mechanics is also presented, demonstrating that the equilibrium vapour pressure of a solvent is proportional to its mole fraction in an ideal solution: Raoult's law. The same argument can be extended to the case where the solvent and solute molecules are of different sizes, as is the case with polymers. The results provide a framework for the correct maintenance of the RH surrounding a sample.

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Bowler ◽  
David R. Bowler ◽  
Matthew W. Bowler

AbstractThe humidity surrounding a sample is an important variable in scientific experiments. Biological samples in particular require not just a humid atmosphere but often a relative humidity (RH) that is in equilibrium with a stabilizing solution required to maintain the sample in the same state during measurements. The controlled dehydration of macromolecular crystals can lead to significant increases in crystal order, which often leads to higher diffraction quality. Devices that can accurately control the humidity surrounding crystals on a beamline have led to this technique being increasingly adopted, as experiments become easier and more reproducible. Matching the relative humidity to the mother liquor is the first step to allow the stable mounting of a crystal. In previous work, we measured the equilibrium relative humidity for a range of concentrations of the most commonly used precipitants and showed how this related to Raoult’s law for the equilibrium vapour pressure of water above a solution. However, a discrepancy between measured values and those predicted by theory could not be explained. Here, we have used a more precise humidity control device to determine equilibrium relative humidity points. The new results are in agreement with Raoult’s law. We also present a simple argument in statistical mechanics demonstrating that the saturated vapour pressure of a solvent is proportional to its mole fraction in an ideal solution: Raoult’s Law. The same argument can be extended to the case where solvent and solute molecules are of different size, as is the case with polymers. The results provide a framework for the correct maintenance of the RH surrounding samples.SynopsisThe equilibrium relative humidity values for a number of the most commonly used precipitants in biological macromolecule crystallisation have been measured using a new humidity control device. A simple argument in statistical mechanics demonstrates that the saturated vapour pressure of a solvent is proportional to its mole fraction in an ideal solution (Raoult’s Law). The same argument can be extended to the case where solvent and solute molecules are of different size.


1970 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-47
Author(s):  
J. Edwards ◽  
M.V. Encina

Abstract Vapour pressure measurements are carried out to test Raoult's law at extreme concentrations, and the deviations are reported. - The azeotropic point is measured and qualitative discussions are presented.


1941 ◽  
Vol 19b (6) ◽  
pp. 143-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. N. Campbell

An experimental study of the vapour pressure, and other physical properties, of an ideal system is described. Raoult's law is followed closely by benzene up to high concentrations of naphthalene. Such behaviour may be connected with the smallness of the dipole moments, although that of naphthalene is far from zero. Other physical properties investigated, viz., density, viscosity, and surface tension, show fairly close, but not exact, additive behaviour. In this respect, the behaviour is very similar to that of a system previously investigated, naphthalene–p-nitrophenol, where, however, the partial pressures show marked deviation from Raoult's law: this is in harmony with the (presumed) high electric moment of p-nitrophenol. It appears, in so far as the two systems studied are concerned, that marked deviation from Raoult's law may be associated with high dipole moment, but that this deviation does not necessarily cause any marked deviation from additivity in other physical properties not dependent on vapour pressure.


1979 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 197 ◽  
Author(s):  
RC Phutela ◽  
DV Fenby

Deviations from Raoult's law in H2O+D2O liquid mixtures are calculated from vapour pressure isotope effects for HDO and D2O by assuming that the equilibrium H2O+ HDO+D2O liquid mixtures are ideal solutions. The results are in good agreement with those obtained experimentally from liquid-mixture vapour pressure and boiling point measurements.


1941 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Staverman ◽  
J. H. van Santen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document