scholarly journals Crystal structures of (2E)-1-(3-bromothiophen-2-yl)-3-(2-methoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one and (2E)-1-(3-bromothiophen-2-yl)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one

Author(s):  
Vasant S. Naik ◽  
Venkataraya Shettigar ◽  
Tyler S. Berglin ◽  
Jillian S. Coburn ◽  
Jerry P. Jasinski ◽  
...  

In the molecules of the title compounds, (2E)-1-(3-bromo-thiophen-2-yl)-3-(2-methoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one, C14H11BrO2S, (I), which crystallizes in the space groupP-1 with four independent molecules in the asymmetric unit (Z′ = 8), and (2E)-1-(3-bromothiophen-2-yl)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one, C15H13BrO3S, (II), which crystallizes withZ′ = 8 in the space groupI2/a, the non-H atoms are nearly coplanar. The molecules of (I) pack with inversion symmetry stacked diagonally along thea-axis direction. Weak C—H...Br intramolecular interactions in each of the four molecules in the asymmetric unit are observed. In (II), weak C—H...O, bifurcated three-center intermolecular interactions forming dimers along with weak C—H...π and π–π stacking interactions are observed, linking the molecules into sheets along [001]. A weak C—H...Br intramolecular interaction is also present. There are no classical hydrogen bonds present in either structure.

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 649-663
Author(s):  
Ligia R. Gomes ◽  
John N. Low ◽  
Alan B. Turner ◽  
Alexander W. Nowicki ◽  
Thomas C. Baddeley ◽  
...  

AbstractThe crystal structures and Hirshfeld surface analyses of the des-A-B-aromatic steroid derivative, (3a,9b)-1,2,3a,4,5,9b-hexahydro-7-methoxy-3a-methyl-3H-benz[e]-inden-3-one (or 5-methoxy-des-A-estra-5,7,9-triene-17-one) 1, its acetohydrazide derivative, 2, and its hydrazone derivative, 3, are reported. All three compounds crystallize in chiral space groups: compounds 1 and 2 in the orthorhombic space group P212121 each with one molecule in the asymmetric unit, and compound 3 in the monoclinic space group P21 with two similar but independent molecules, Mol A and Mol B, in the asymmetric unit. Both the five-membered and six-membered non-aromatic rings in all three compounds have envelope or near envelope shapes. In compounds 2 and 3 the N=N units have (E)-arrangements. The intermolecular interactions in crystals of compound 1 are C–H · · · O hydrogen bonds and C–H · · · π interactions, in compound 2 N–H · · · O and C–H · · · O hydrogen bonds and C–H · · · π interactions are present, while in compound 3 there are just C–H · · · π interactions. An important substructure in 1 is a sheet of molecules, composed of ${\rm{R}}_6^6(44)$ rings, formed from C–H · · · O(methoxy) and C–H · · · O(carbonyl) hydrogen bonds, the molecules of which form columns linked via the B and D rings, i.e. in a head-to-tail fashion. Compound 2 is an acylhydrazonyl compound, in which the two independent molecules are linked into asymmetric dimers via strong classical N–H · · · O hydrogen bonds, with the formation of ${\rm{R}}_2^2(8)$ rings. In both 1 and 2, further intermolecular interactions result in 3-dimensional structures, while compound 3 has a 1-dimensional structure arising from C–H · · · O interactions generating spiral chains. The results have been compared with existing data.


2002 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 914-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. G. Jones ◽  
J. Ossowski ◽  
P. Kus

N,N′-Dibutyl-terephthaldiamide (1), N,N′-dihexyl-terephthaldiamide (2), N,N′-di(tert-butyl)- terephthaldiamide (3), N,N,N′,N′-tetrabutyl-terephthaldiamide (4), 1,1′-terephthaloylbis- pyrrolidine (5), 1,1′-terephthaloyl-bis-piperidine (6), and 4,4′-terephthaloyl-bis-morpholine (7) have been synthesised and physicochemically characterised. The X-ray structure determinations reveal imposed inversion symmetry for compounds 1-6; compound 3 has two independent molecules with inversion symmetry in the asymmetric unit. Compounds 1-3 form classical hydrogen bonds of the type N-H···O=C, leading to a ribbon-like arrangement of molecules (1 and 2) or a layer structure (3). Compound 3 also displays a very short C-H···O interaction, a type of hydrogen bond that is also observed in compounds 4-7, which lack classical donors; thereby compounds 4-6 form layer structures and 7 a complex threedimensional network.


2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 1117-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitrijs Stepanovs ◽  
Daniels Posevins ◽  
Maris Turks

The title compounds consist of a bornane skeleton with attached acetamide, C12H21NO (±)-(1) {systematic name: (±)-N-[(1RS,2RS,4RS)-1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl]acetamide}, and chloroacetamide, C12H20ClNO (±)-(2) {systematic name: (±)-2-chloro-N-[(1RS,2RS,4RS)-1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl]acetamide}, functionalities to the 2-exo-position. The crystal structure of the first monoclinic polymorph of (±)-(1) has been reported previously [Unget al.(2014).Monatsh. Chem.145, 983–992]. Compound (±)-(1) crystallizes in the space groupP21/nwith two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit, in contrast to the above-mentioned polymorph which crystallized in the space groupC2/cwith one molecule in the asymmetric unit. In the title compounds, the bicyclic bornane moieties have normal geometries. In the crystals of both compounds, molecules are linked by N—H...O hydrogen bonds, reinforced by C—H...O contacts, formingtrans-amide chains propagating along thea-axis direction. In the case of compound (±)-(1), neighbouring chains are linked by further C—H...O contacts, forming double-chain ribbons along [100].


2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (7) ◽  
pp. 575-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Kramer ◽  
Michael Bolte

Kryptoracemates are racemic compounds (pairs of enantiomers) that crystallize in Sohnke space groups (space groups that contain neither inversion centres nor mirror or glide planes nor rotoinversion axes). Thus, the two symmetry-independent molecules cannot be transformed into one another by any symmetry element present in the crystal structure. Usually, the conformation of the two enantiomers is rather similar if not identical. Sometimes, the two enantiomers are related by a pseudosymmetry element, which is often a pseudocentre of inversion, because inversion symmetry is thought to be favourable for crystal packing. We obtained crystals of two kryptoracemates of two very similar compounds differing in just one residue, namely rac-N-[(1S,2R,3S)-2-methyl-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-1-phenyl-3-(pivalamido)propyl]benzamide, C27H32N2O3, (I), and rac-N-[(1S,2S,3R)-2-methyl-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-1-phenyl-3-(propionamido)propyl]benzamide dichloromethane hemisolvate, C25H28N2O3·0.5CH2Cl2, (II). The crystals of both compounds contain both enantiomers of these chiral molecules. However, since the space groups [P212121 for (I) and P1 for (II)] contain neither inversion centres nor mirror or glide planes nor rotoinversion axes, there are both enantiomers in the asymmetric unit, which is a rather uncommon phenomenon. In addition, it is remarkable that (II) contains two pairs of enantiomers in the asymmetric unit. In the crystal, molecules are connected by intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds to form chains or layered structures.


2013 ◽  
Vol 69 (10) ◽  
pp. 1177-1180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao-Cheng Shi ◽  
Hong-Yang Duan

The title compounds, 3,5,7-triphenyl-1,2-diazacyclohepta-1(7),2-diene, C23H20N2, (I), and 3,7-bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenyl-1,2-diazacyclohepta-1(7),2-diene, C23H20N2O2, (II), constitute the first structurally characterized examples of seven-membered heterocycles with 1,2-diaza ring N atoms. Compound (I) crystallizes in the space groupP\overline{1}, with two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit that differ in the conformation of one of the phenyl rings, while (II) crystallizes in the space groupC2/c. The C5N2ring in each of (I) and (II) adopts a twist-boat conformation. Compound (I) exhibits neither C—H...π interactions nor π–π stacking interactions, whereas (II) shows both intramolecular O—H...N hydrogen bonds and a C—H...π interaction that joins the molecules into an infinite chain in the [010] direction.


2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig J. Kelly ◽  
Janet M. S. Skakle ◽  
James L. Wardell ◽  
Solange M. S. V. Wardell ◽  
John N. Low ◽  
...  

Molecules of N-(4′-iodophenylsulfonyl)-4-nitroaniline, 4-O2NC6H4NHSO2C6H4I-4′ (1), are linked by three-centre I...O2N interactions into chains and these chains are linked into a three-dimensional framework by C—H...O hydrogen bonds. In the isomeric N-(4′-nitrophenylsulfonyl)-4-iodoaniline, 4-IC6H4NHSO2C6H4NO2-4′ (2), the chains generated by the I...O2N interactions are again linked into a three-dimensional framework by C—H...O hydrogen bonds. Molecules of N,N-bis(3′-nitrophenylsulfonyl)-4-iodoaniline, 4-IC6H4N(SO2C6H4NO2-3′)2 (3), lie across twofold rotation axes in space group C2/c and they are linked into chains by paired I...O=S interactions: these chains are linked into sheets by a C—H...O hydrogen bond, and the sheets are linked into a three-dimensional framework by aromatic π...π stacking interactions. In N-(4′-iodophenylsulfonyl)-3-nitroaniline, 3-O2NC6H4NHSO2C6H4I-4′ (4), there are R^2_2(8) rings formed by hard N—H...O=S hydrogen bonds and R^2_2(24) rings formed by two-centre I...nitro interactions, which together generate a chain of fused rings: the combination of a C—H...O hydrogen bond and aromatic π...π stacking interactions links the chains into sheets. Molecules of N-(4′-iodophenylsulfonyl)-4-methyl-2-nitroaniline, 4-CH3-2-O2NC6H3NHSO2C6H4I-4′ (5), are linked by N—H...O=S and C—H...O(nitro) hydrogen bonds into a chain containing alternating R^2_2(8) and R^2_2(10) rings, but there are no I...O interactions of either type. There are two molecules in the asymmetric unit of N-(4′-iodophenylsulfonyl)-2-nitroaniline, 2-O2NC6H4NHSO2C6H4I-4′ (6), and the combination of an I...O=S interaction and a hard N—H...O(nitro) hydrogen bond links the two types of molecule to form a cyclic, centrosymmetric four-component aggregate. C—H...O hydrogen bonds link these four-molecule aggregates to form a molecular ladder. Comparisons are made with structures retrieved from the Cambridge Structural Database.


2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (9) ◽  
pp. 1036-1041
Author(s):  
S. Gopinath ◽  
K. Sethusankar ◽  
Bose Muthu Ramalingam ◽  
Arasambattu K. Mohanakrishnan

The title compounds, C17H13NO2S, (I), C17H13NO3S, (II), and C24H17ClN2O5S·CHCl3, (III), are indole derivatives. Compounds (I) and (II) crystalize with two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. The indole ring systems in all three structures deviate only slightly from planarity, with dihedral angles between the planes of the pyrrole and benzene rings spanning the tight range 0.20 (9)–1.65 (9)°. These indole ring systems, in turn, are almost orthogonal to the phenylsulfonyl rings [range of dihedral angles between mean planes = 77.21 (8)–89.26 (8)°]. In the three compounds, the molecular structure is stabilized by intramolecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds, generatingS(6) ring motifs with the sulfone O atom. In compounds (I) and (II), the two independent molecules are linked by C—H...O hydrogen bonds and C—H...π interactions, while in compound (III), the molecules are linked by C—H...O hydrogen bonds, generatingR22(22) inversion dimers.


2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. o501-o502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manpreet Kaur ◽  
Jerry P. Jasinski ◽  
Thammarse S. Yamuna ◽  
H. S. Yathirajan ◽  
K. Byrappa

The title compound, C24H20N2OS, crystallizes with two independent molecules (AandB) in the asymmetric unit, in each of which the cyclohexene rings adopt half-chair conformations. The mean plane of the indole ring is twisted from those of the phenyl and thiophene rings by 69.0 (7) and 8.3 (5)°, respectively, in moleculeAand by 65.4 (9) and 6.7 (5)°, respectively, in moleculeB. The dihedral angles between the mean planes of the phenyl and thiophene rings are 63.0 (4) and 58.8 (9)° in moleculesAandB, respectively. In the crystal, N—H...O hydrogen bonds lead to the formation of an infinite chain along [101]. In addition, π–π stacking interactions are observed involving the thiophene and pyrrole rings of the two molecules, with a shortest intercentroid distance of 3.468 (2) Å.


2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 833-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Shakuntala ◽  
S. Naveen ◽  
N. K. Lokanath ◽  
P. A. Suchetan ◽  
M. Abdoh

The synthesis and evaluation of the pharmacological activities of molecules containing the sulfonamide moiety have attracted interest as these compounds are important pharmacophores. The crystal structures of three closely related N-aryl-2,5-dimethoxybenzenesulfonamides, namely N-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-2,5-dimethoxybenzenesulfonamide, C14H13Cl2NO4S, (I), N-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2,5-dimethoxybenzenesulfonamide, C14H13Cl2NO4S, (II), and N-(2,4-dimethylphenyl)-2,5-dimethoxybenzenesulfonamide, C16H19NO4S, (III), are described. The asymmetric unit of (I) consists of two symmetry-independent molecules, while those of (II) and (III) contain one molecule each. The molecular conformations are stabilized by different intramolecular interactions, viz. C—H...O interactions in (I), N—H...Cl and C—H...O interactions in (II), and C—H...O interactions in (III). The crystals of the three compounds display different supramolecular architectures built by various weak intermolecular interactions of the types C—H...O, C—H...Cl, C—H...π(aryl), π(aryl)–π(aryl) and Cl...Cl. A detailed Hirshfeld surface analysis of these compounds has also been conducted in order to understand the relationship between the crystal structures. The d norm and shape-index surfaces of (I)–(III) support the presence of various intermolecular interactions in the three structures. Analysis of the fingerprint plots reveals that the greatest contribution to the Hirshfeld surfaces is from H...H contacts, followed by H...O/O...H contacts. In addition, comparisons are made with the structures of some related compounds. Putative N—H...O hydrogen bonds are observed in 29 of the 30 reported structures, wherein the N—H...O hydrogen bonds form either C(4) chain motifs or R 2 2(8) rings. Further comparison reveals that the characteristics of the N—H...O hydrogen-bond motifs, the presence of other interactions and the resultant supramolecular architecture is largely decided by the position of the substituents on the benzenesulfonyl ring, with the nature and position of the substituents on the aniline ring exerting little effect. On the other hand, the crystal structures of (I)–(III) display several weak interactions other than the common N—H...O hydrogen bonds, resulting in supramolecular architectures varying from one- to three-dimensional depending on the nature and position of the substituents on the aniline ring.


Author(s):  
Jamie R. Kerr ◽  
Laurent Trembleau ◽  
John M. D. Storey ◽  
James L. Wardell ◽  
William T. A. Harrison

We describe the syntheses and crystal structures of two indole derivatives, namely 6-isopropyl-3-(2-nitro-1-phenylethyl)-1H-indole, C19H20N2O2, (I), and 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(2-nitro-1-phenylethyl)-1H-indole, C23H20N2O3, (II); the latter crystallizes with two molecules (AandB) with similar conformations (r.m.s. overlay fit = 0.139 Å) in the asymmetric unit. Despite the presence of O atoms as potential acceptors for classical hydrogen bonds, the dominant intermolecular interaction in each crystal is an N—H...π bond, which generates chains in (I) andA+AandB+Binversion dimers in (II). A different aromatic ring acts as the acceptor in each case. The packing is consolidated by C—H...π interactions in each case but aromatic π–π stacking interactions are absent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document