scholarly journals Challenges in solving structures from radiation-damaged tomograms of protein nanocrystals assessed by simulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 572-586
Author(s):  
Ariana Peck ◽  
Qing Yao ◽  
Aaron S. Brewster ◽  
Petrus H. Zwart ◽  
John M. Heumann ◽  
...  

Structure-determination methods are needed to resolve the atomic details that underlie protein function. X-ray crystallography has provided most of our knowledge of protein structure, but is constrained by the need for large, well ordered crystals and the loss of phase information. The rapidly developing methods of serial femtosecond crystallography, micro-electron diffraction and single-particle reconstruction circumvent the first of these limitations by enabling data collection from nanocrystals or purified proteins. However, the first two methods also suffer from the phase problem, while many proteins fall below the molecular-weight threshold required for single-particle reconstruction. Cryo-electron tomography of protein nanocrystals has the potential to overcome these obstacles of mainstream structure-determination methods. Here, a data-processing scheme is presented that combines routines from X-ray crystallography and new algorithms that have been developed to solve structures from tomograms of nanocrystals. This pipeline handles image-processing challenges specific to tomographic sampling of periodic specimens and is validated using simulated crystals. The tolerance of this workflow to the effects of radiation damage is also assessed. The simulations indicate a trade-off between a wider tilt range to facilitate merging data from multiple tomograms and a smaller tilt increment to improve phase accuracy. Since phase errors, but not merging errors, can be overcome with additional data sets, these results recommend distributing the dose over a wide angular range rather than using a finer sampling interval to solve the protein structure.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariana Peck ◽  
Qing Yao ◽  
Aaron S. Brewster ◽  
Petrus H. Zwart ◽  
John M. Heumann ◽  
...  

Structure determination methods are needed to resolve the atomic details that underlie protein function. X-ray crystallography has provided most of our knowledge of protein structure but is constrained by the need for large, well-ordered crystals and the loss of phase information. The rapidly developing methods of serial femtosecond crystallography, micro-electron diffraction, and single-particle reconstruction circumvent the first of these limitations by enabling data collection from nanocrystals or purified proteins. However, the first two methods also suffer from the phase problem, while many proteins fall below the molecular weight threshold required by single-particle reconstruction. Cryo-electron tomography of protein nanocrystals has the potential to overcome these obstacles of mainstream structure determination methods. Here we present a data processing scheme that combines routines from X-ray crystallography and new algorithms we developed to solve structures from tomograms of nanocrystals. This pipeline handles image processing challenges specific to tomographic sampling of periodic specimens and is validated using simulated crystals. We also assess the tolerance of this workflow to the effects of radiation damage. Our simulations indicate a trade-off between a wider tilt-range to facilitate merging data from multiple tomograms and a smaller tilt increment to improve phase accuracy. Since phase errors but not merging errors can be overcome with additional datasets, these results recommend distributing the dose over a wide angular range rather than using a finer sampling interval to solve the protein structure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 4186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emeka Nwanochie ◽  
Vladimir N. Uversky

Traditionally, X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy represent major workhorses of structural biologists, with the lion share of protein structures reported in protein data bank (PDB) being generated by these powerful techniques. Despite their wide utilization in protein structure determination, these two techniques have logical limitations, with X-ray crystallography being unsuitable for the analysis of highly dynamic structures and with NMR spectroscopy being restricted to the analysis of relatively small proteins. In recent years, we have witnessed an explosive development of the techniques based on Cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM) for structural characterization of biological molecules. In fact, single-particle Cryo-EM is a special niche as it is a technique of choice for the structural analysis of large, structurally heterogeneous, and dynamic complexes. Here, sub-nanometer atomic resolution can be achieved (i.e., resolution below 10 Å) via single-particle imaging of non-crystalline specimens, with accurate 3D reconstruction being generated based on the computational averaging of multiple 2D projection images of the same particle that was frozen rapidly in solution. We provide here a brief overview of single-particle Cryo-EM and show how Cryo-EM has revolutionized structural investigations of membrane proteins. We also show that the presence of intrinsically disordered or flexible regions in a target protein represents one of the major limitations of this promising technique.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 1240009 ◽  
Author(s):  
AMEET SONI ◽  
JUDE SHAVLIK

Protein X-ray crystallography — the most popular method for determining protein structures — remains a laborious process requiring a great deal of manual crystallographer effort to interpret low-quality protein images. Automating this process is critical in creating a high-throughput protein-structure determination pipeline. Previously, our group developed ACMI, a probabilistic framework for producing protein-structure models from electron-density maps produced via X-ray crystallography. ACMI uses a Markov Random Field to model the three-dimensional (3D) location of each non-hydrogen atom in a protein. Calculating the best structure in this model is intractable, so ACMI uses approximate inference methods to estimate the optimal structure. While previous results have shown ACMI to be the state-of-the-art method on this task, its approximate inference algorithm remains computationally expensive and susceptible to errors. In this work, we develop Probabilistic Ensembles in ACMI (PEA), a framework for leveraging multiple, independent runs of approximate inference to produce estimates of protein structures. Our results show statistically significant improvements in the accuracy of inference resulting in more complete and accurate protein structures. In addition, PEA provides a general framework for advanced approximate inference methods in complex problem domains.


2011 ◽  
Vol 287 (7) ◽  
pp. 4946-4956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pu Qian ◽  
Christopher J. Marklew ◽  
Joanne Viney ◽  
Paul A. Davison ◽  
Amanda A. Brindley ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document