The effects of IFRS experience on audit fees for listed companies in China

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsiao-Lun Lin ◽  
Ai-Ru Yen
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Stock Exchanges ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Pricing Decisions ◽  
Ifrs Adoption ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
High Degree

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine whether and how auditors’ and audit clients’ IFRS-related experience alters auditors’ pricing decisions in the initial years of IFRS adoption in China. Design/methodology/approach – The authors conduct the analysis by examining audit fees from 4,129 sample observations that issued A-shares in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2005 to 2008. The authors empirically test the association between audit premiums and auditors’ and auditees’ IFRS experience. Findings – The authors find that auditors with IFRS experience charged significantly higher audit premiums in the initial years of IFRS adoption. The authors also find that audit clients’ with IFRS experience paid significantly lower incremental fees. The authors further find that the increased fees charged by audit firms with IFRS experience are independent of the degree of changes in the financial reporting complexity of their clients. In contrast, audit clients with IFRS experience paid lower incremental fees only when they underwent a high degree of changes in financial reporting complexity. Originality/value – First, it is the understanding that this study is the first to provide evidence on the effect of audit clients’ experience on audit fees. Second, the measure of auditors’ expertise is independent of audit clients’ decisions and is a less noisy measure. Third, the findings complement the existing evidence from other countries regarding the effects of IFRS convergence on audit fees. Finally, this study empirically tests the effects of changes in financial reporting complexity on audit fees.

The effect of mandatory XBRL and IFRS adoption on audit fees

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan George Shan ◽  
Indrit Troshani
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Developing Economies ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Emerging Economy ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Ifrs Adoption ◽  
The Impact

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the impact of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) on audit fees based on evidence from listed companies operating in an emerging economy. Whilst IFRS constitute high-quality accounting standards, XBRL represents a technology standard that can enhance the usability of IFRS and overall financial reporting transparency. Design/methodology/approach – Multivariate analyses are used on a sample of 1,798 firm-year observations between 2000 and 2011 from companies listed in the Shanghai Stock Exchange that were subject to XBRL and IFRS adoption mandates. Findings – The main results suggest that XBRL has a main negative effect on audit fees which is weaker for larger firms. Additionally, the authors find that IFRS increases audit fees for all companies. Whilst this effect is positive for firms of different sizes, it is weaker for larger firms. Research limitations/implications – Whilst the findings are applicable to the selected sample and may or may not be generaliseable to other economies, they can provide important implications for both regulators and companies that are undertaking IFRS convergence and XBRL implementation projects in developing economies around the world. Originality/value – This study offers a timely assessment of the economic consequences of IFRS and XBRL on listed companies operating in an emerging economy, in addition to providing an important basis upon which further research can be designed in order to extend the analysis.

The relationship between audit components and audit expectation gap in listed companies on the Tehran stock exchange

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdi Salehi ◽  
Fariba Jahanbin ◽  
Mohammad Sadegh Adibian
Keyword(s):  
Regression Model ◽  
Multiple Regression ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Multiple Regression Model ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Expectation Gap ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose The expectation gap between auditors and users has recently been the topic of many controversies. This paper aims to evaluate the relationship between auditor’s characteristics and audit expectation gap among information users in listed companies on the Tehran stock exchange market. In other words, the study attempts to find whether there is a significant relationship between audit components and the audit expectation gap or not. Design/methodology/approach The multiple regression model is used to test the hypotheses. Research hypotheses are tested using a sample of 78 listed companies on the Tehran stock exchange during 2012-2016, by using integrated data technique of the multiple regression model. Findings The findings show that standard audit fees are not significantly associated with the audit expectation gap. Furthermore, audit fees are negatively associated with the audit expectation gap, which provides that allocated audit price in financial statements gives useful information for external and internal individuals. Predictably, it is recommended that audit opinion significantly determines the level of the audit expectation gap. The authors also find that the independence of the director boards and audit committee members fulfill the expectation gap of individual users. Moreover, finding the negative impact of audit firms ranking on the expectation gap, supports the idea of higher ranked audit firms provide high quality services, and consequently, more reliable information. Finally, the results show that the audit record is positively associated with the audit expectation gap. Originality/value As all recent studies on the expectation gap were qualitative, the present study is the first paper, which measures the expectation gap quantitatively through the statistical method.

The effect of changing fiscal year-ends on audit fees and audit quality

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-382
Author(s):  
Angel Arturo Pacheco Paredes ◽  
Clark Wheatley
Keyword(s):  
Design Methodology ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose This study aims to extend recent research analyzing the effect of auditor busyness on audit quality. Specifically, this study explores the effect on audit quality of a change of fiscal year-end to or from an audit firm’s busy period. Design/methodology/approach Empirical archival. Findings When firms change their fiscal year-end to a period when the auditor is less busy, client firms are rewarded with lower audit fees and auditors are rewarded with a reduction in required effort. This study finds no difference in the level of audit quality after a change in fiscal year-end. Practical implications There are significant implications for audit firms as they may gain cost advantages by successfully promoting off-season fiscal year-ends, and reduce the negative effect on employees associated with “busy season” stress. Similarly, client firms may find that audit costs are reduced when they adopt a less “busy” fiscal year-end. Social implications These results have policy implications for regulators because regulators often dictate the fiscal year-end for certain industries or traded securities. Such dictates may thus introduce inefficiencies into the market for audit services. Originality/value These results should guide regulators in their decisions to dictate fiscal year-ends and firms in their choice of reporting periods.

What influences the willingness of Vietnamese accountants to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by 2025?

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duc Phan ◽  
Mahesh Joshi ◽  
Bruno Mascitelli
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Ifrs Adoption ◽  
Willingness To Adopt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of perceived implications of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adoption on the willingness to adopt IFRS.Design/methodology/approachThe study analysed the causal relationships between perceptions and the willingness of the accountants to adopt IFRS.FindingsThe findings revealed that perceived benefits drove the willingness to adopt IFRS whereas the perceived disadvantages and challenges diminished the willingness. Knowledge of IFRS enhanced the willingness towards IFRS adoption. Also, legitimacy desire enhanced the association between the perceived implications and the willingness to adopt IFRS.Originality/valueThe study contributes significantly to theory and practice as Vietnamese policy makers recently announced their strategic planning to full IFRS adoption by 2025.

Firm characteristics and compliance with IAS/IFRS

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-410
Author(s):  
Ali Alnaas ◽  
Afzalur Rashid
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
North Africa ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Stock Exchanges ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Firm Characteristics ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards

Purpose This paper aims to examine the influence of firm characteristics on harmonisation of companies listed on the Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia Stock Exchanges. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a checklist based mainly on the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Findings The findings of the study are 6that the level of compliance with IFRS was higher in 2010 than in 2005. Multiple regression analysis indicates that the level of compliance with IFRS increases with company size, institutional ownership, industry and language of disclosure. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study suggest that both institutional- and firm-level forces influence the harmonisation process. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature on accounting harmonisation in the context of North Africa.

The state of IFRS in Africa

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Tawiah
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
International Accounting ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Ifrs Adoption ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
Professional Capacity

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to appraise existing literature on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Africa. It covers all 54 African countries and their membership in regional and international accounting bodies. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses qualitative research methods, including review and synthesis of a variety of archival materials. Findings Unlike the numerous variations in IFRS adoption on other continents, IFRS countries in Africa have adopted the standards as issued by International Accounting Standard Board (IASB). However, most countries are slow to implement the ROSC (AA) recommendations for IFRS adoption due to lack of institutional and professional capacity. With regards to the unintended consequences, IFRS adoption has made international professional qualifications such as Association of Certified Chartered Accountants popular in Africa; hence, national accounting qualifications are not attractive to prospective accountants. Similarly, IFRS adoption has created a competitive advantage for the Big4 audit firms because companies in IFRS countries prefer the services of the Big4 to that of the local audit firms. Originality/value It is concluded that international organisations that recommend IFRS to Africa, such as the IFRS foundation, IMF and World Bank, should build the sustainable professional and institutional capacity of the countries before persuading them to adopt IFRS, because in Africa, adopting a law is easy but operationalising it has always been the challenge.

IFRS adoption/reporting and auditor fees: the conditional effect of audit firm size and tenure

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-666
Author(s):  
Medhat N. El Guindy ◽  
Nadia Sbei Trabelsi
Keyword(s):  
Audit Fees ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Ifrs Adoption ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
Conditional Effect ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Cost ◽  
First Time ◽  
Big Four

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the impact of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adoption on audit and non-audit fees in the UK setting. The study investigates whether UK firms adopting IFRS for the first time or reporting under IFRS, in general, are being charged higher audit and non-audit fees and whether this impact is conditional on audit firm size and tenure. Design/methodology/approach Using empirical data for UK listed firms from 2003-2007, the paper uses a regression model that explains audit and non-audit fees by independent variables measuring auditors’ and auditees’ characteristics including IFRS adoption and reporting. Additional regressions with interaction terms were performed to test the hypothetical conditional impact of auditor size and audit firm tenure on the above-mentioned association. Findings Audit and non-audit fees increase significantly for companies adopting IFRS for the first time and this increase is persistent during later years. In addition, results suggest that both Big four and non-Big four auditors charge higher audit and non-audit fees to their clients adopting or reporting under IFRS in a similar manner. Furthermore, findings indicate that audit firms increase audit and non-audit fees for old and new clients using IFRS which suggests no low-balling effect is detected. Research limitations/implications Results reported in this study provide insights to regulators in jurisdictions similar to the UK regarding the cost of IFRS adoption which includes higher audit and non-audit fees imposed by both Big four and non-Big four audit firms. In addition, this study argues, to some extent, against the notion that auditors may charge lower fees in the early years of the audit engagement to win new audit clients. Originality/value To the best of the knowledge, the findings are unique at two levels. First, the paper provides evidence on the cost of using IFRS in the UK jurisdiction which was not explored by previous research. Second, the paper investigates the potential conditional effect of auditor size and audit tenure on the association between IFRS adoption and auditors’ fees.

scholarly journals Banks’ audit committees, audit firm alumni and fees paid to audit firm

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 783-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Ittonen ◽  
Emma-Riikka Myllymäki ◽  
Per Christen Tronnes
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Committee Chair ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
Non Audit Services

Purpose This paper focuses on bank audit committees and examines whether audit committee members who are former auditors are associated with the acquisition of audit and non-audit services from their former employers. Design/methodology/approach The study empirically examines a sample of large banks that are included in the S&P Composite 1500. Findings The paper reports significantly lower audit fees and a higher proportion of non-audit fees to total fees when the audit committee chair is an alumnus of the incumbent audit firm. Moreover, additional analysis reveals that these findings are stronger for banks with more earnings management. Research limitations/implications Overall, the findings indicate that audit firms might consider banks using their alumni as audit committee chairs to be less risky or easier to audit, thus requiring relatively less effort from the auditors. The reduced effort required to audit clients with audit firm alumni on their audit committees then has the effect of reducing the audit fees charged. Alternatively, their auditing experience and cognitive proximity might influence the assessment of the need for auditing or the ability to negotiate lower audit fees on the part of audit firm alumni. Originality/value This paper provides empirical evidence of the association between audit firm alumni in influential positions on an audit committee and fees paid to those audit firms in the banking industry. The findings contribute to the literature by suggesting that banks with affiliated former auditors chairing their audit committees not only have significantly lower audit fees but also a higher proportion is spent on non-audit services.

Does Convergent-IFRS Adoption in China Increase Audit Fees?

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 2050006
Author(s):  
Yu Ling Tsai ◽  
Hua-Wei Huang
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Price Competition ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Stock Exchanges ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Audit Market ◽  
Ifrs Adoption

The aim of this study is to investigate whether the adoption of convergent-International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in China affects the audit fees of initial public offerings (IPO) firms. An empirical regression analysis using panel data for 1,094 nonfinancial IPOs (excluding season equity offers) of A-shares listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges between 2003 and 2012 is adopted. The results reveal that audit fees increase following convergent-IFRS adoption in China and additionally suggest that convergent-IFRS adoption eases the intense price competition that previously existed in China’s audit market and thus has important policy implications for regulators. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study represents the first reported attempt to adopt the IPO setting to examine the effects of convergent-IFRS adoption on audit fees and fills the gap in literature. Using a setting of IPOs enables this paper to further exclude the influence of quasi-rents derived from low-balling after initial audit engagement when testing audit fees.

Abnormal audit fees and accrual and real earnings management: evidence from UK

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Alhadab
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Real Earnings Management ◽  
Direct Impact ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Negatively Associated ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
The Uk

Purpose This paper aims to examine the relationship between abnormal audit fees and accrual-based and real-based earnings management by using a sample of 1,055 UK firm-year observations from 2006 to 2015. Design/methodology/approach Linear regression was used to test the hypothetical relation between abnormal audit fees and accrual and real earnings management. Following prior research, several proxies have been used to measure abnormal audit fees, accrual earnings management and real earnings management. Findings Abnormal audit fees were negatively associated with real earnings management. A higher level of abnormal audit fees was the major driver of enhanced audit quality, in turn reducing managers’ flexibility to use real earnings management and to manipulate reported earnings. Abnormal audit fees were found to be negatively associated with abnormal discretionary expenses, abnormal production costs and the aggregated measure of real earnings management. Practical implications This paper outlines the importance of considering any abnormal audit fees paid to audit firms. It is expected that the abnormal audit fees might compromise auditor independence and lead to a higher level of earnings management. However, the findings of this paper provide a new insight to many interested parties, e.g. regulators, audit firms, investors and creditors, that abnormal audit fees are associated with higher audit quality and higher financial reporting quality in the UK. Regulators in the meanwhile should reform the audit market by, e.g. revising the types of non-audit services that are provided for the same client, setting a cap on the maximum fees that can charged by auditors and monitoring earnings management practices. Audit firms should take into consideration that any charged abnormal level of audit fees may have a direct impact on audit quality. Originality/value This is the first study to examine the impact of abnormal audit fees on accruals and real earnings management after major regulatory changes that took place in the UK. These major changes are the adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standards in 2005 and the new legislation concerning the ethical standards issued by the UK Audit Practice Board in 2004. These two major changes are expected to have a direct impact on both earnings management and audit fees, notably for the largest public listed firms. This study also focuses on one of the very developed and attractive stock markets in the world, the UK FTSE 350 stock index, that incorporates that largest 350 public firms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document