scholarly journals Management Control Systems and Innovation: a levers of control analysis in an innovative company

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rúben Silva Barros ◽  
Ana Maria Dias Simões da Costa Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Control Systems ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Management Control Systems ◽  
Control Analysis ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Consistent Reinforcement ◽  
Innovative Company ◽  
Levers Of Control

Purpose Building on the growing body of research that has addressed management control systems and innovation, the purpose of this study is to assess the extent and nature of the use of controls in an innovative setting and how they work together unveiling the relationships and tensions amongst the Simons’ levers. Design/methodology/approach This study resorts to an in-depth and single case study in a company that has both a strong orientation to innovation and stable control practices in place. Evidence was collected from 32 interviews, visits to the company and internal documentation. Findings At the case company, it was possible to find the presence of controls according to all the levers of control. Likewise, joint effects of controls used according to interactive and beliefs approaches and diagnostic and boundary controls showed a consistent reinforcement that push the organization in a single direction. Signs of some countervailing reinforcement between these pairs were also detected, creating tensions. This in general shows that innovation can be weighed against the necessity of goal achievement taking place within fields in which the company can exploit the effort developed. Originality/value This study documents the collective use of controls in a context in which innovation is needed and how the combination of the levers of control with their inner workings and tensions allow the company to have a corporate environment of innovation that is friendly.

Synthesizing management control frameworks

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnie O'Grady ◽  
Paul Rouse ◽  
Cathy Gunn
Keyword(s):  
Control Systems ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Management Control Systems ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Control Framework ◽  
Explicit Consideration ◽  
Multiple Levels ◽  
Viable System ◽  
Levers Of Control ◽  
Practical Implications

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the holistic nature of control systems to understand how they operate across organizational levels and manage change.Design/methodology/approachThis paper takes an analytical approach using the viable system model (VSM) to assess the two main frameworks of control reported in the accounting literature.FindingsThe VSM provides an elegant framework for management control systems with explicit consideration of: multiple levels of control, communication channels, interactions with the environment, and the mechanisms for attaining balance between stability and change.Practical implicationsThe evaluation of current management control systems produces specific suggestions for improving the levers of control frameworkOriginality/valueThe VSM has not previously been aligned with management control frameworks.

How management control systems enable and constrain integrated thinking

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Dimes ◽  
Charl de Villiers
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Control Systems ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Management Control Systems ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Perceived Trust

Purpose This paper aims to examine how management control systems (MCS) can enable and constrain the successful adoption of integrated thinking in an organisation. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a case study approach, involving in-depth interviews and documentary evidence. Findings The case study organisation perceived trust to be critical to the successful adoption of integrated thinking, and informal social controls with strong endorsement from senior management frequently substituted for more formal technical controls in helping to develop a trust-based organisational culture. These cultural changes improved collaboration and brought economic benefits by encouraging outcome-based decision-making rather than capital-based decision-making, thereby enabling employees to identify and address poorly performing projects earlier. However, established performance measurement systems geared towards reporting and rewarding accounting profits created tension, constraining the potential benefits of integrated thinking by reinforcing business unit protectionism. Practical implications Integrated thinking can be seen as a form of management with the potential to improve organisational outcomes. An improved understanding of factors that might enable or constrain integrated thinking could facilitate its spread. Originality/value Despite several calls for research on the practical implementation of integrated thinking, this has not been studied extensively. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the firsts to contribute to a better understanding of the role of MCS in the successful implementation of integrated thinking in an organisation. The study also contributes to the MCS literature.

Sustainability reporting integrated into management control systems

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Kerr ◽  
Paul Rouse ◽  
Charl de Villiers
Keyword(s):  
Control Systems ◽  
Balanced Scorecard ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Management Control Systems ◽  
Management Control System ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Balanced Scorecard ◽  
External Reporting

Purpose – This paper aims to examine how three different organisations integrate sustainability reporting into management control systems (MCS). Design/methodology/approach – A case study examination of sustainability reporting integrated into MCS in three New Zealand organisations. Findings – The integration of sustainability reporting into MCS holds advantages for organisations to operationalise sustainability objectives, broaden stakeholder accountability as well as intensify interactions with stakeholders, formalise organisation beliefs and improve communication of sustainability measures internally. While frameworks such as the balanced scorecard (BSC) can facilitate implementation of sustainability reporting, some organisations may choose to fully integrate the latter into their management control system. Originality/value – Sustainability reporting is sometimes seen as an external reporting philosophy that can be managed as a separate project. The authors show it can be integrated into MCS, either entirely or through tools such as the BSC. The authors develop a framework that may be useful in future studies to locate our case organisations.

Institutional entrepreneurship and management control systems

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Martin-Sardesai
Keyword(s):  
Control Systems ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Management Control Systems ◽  
Research Assessment ◽  
Institutional Entrepreneurship ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Institutional Entrepreneurs ◽  
Institutional Entrepreneur

Purpose This study aims to explore how management control systems (MCS) compliment institutional entrepreneurship. It provides a case illustration of how the Vice Chancellor (VC) as an institutional entrepreneur used MCS to bring about a change in an Australian public sector university in anticipation of an externally imposed research assessment exercise. Design/methodology/approach This case study gathered qualitative data through key informant interviews (including deputy VCs, research managers, executive deans and heads of departments) and a review of university and other electronic policy-related documents. Findings The study contributes to an understanding of the external environment that drives university leaders to become institutional entrepreneurs, and what they precisely do to facilitate the internal dynamic change in line with political demands. Research limitations/implications Being a single case study, care should be taken in generalizing the findings. However, it raises significant issues that deserve further attention, for example, the impact of change on the working life of academics. Practical implications The research study identifies the proposed imposition of a research assessment exercise as an enabling condition under which an institutional entrepreneur could promote and activate a new vision. It provides useful insights for other universities operating in the rapidly changing environment. Originality/value In identifying the way institutional entrepreneurs bring about change by promoting a vision and operationalizing it through MCS, the research study extends literature on institutional entrepreneurship MCS and organizational change.

scholarly journals The use of management control and performance measurement systems in SMEs

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2169-2191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biljana Pešalj ◽  
Andrey Pavlov ◽  
Pietro Micheli
Keyword(s):  
Performance Measurement ◽  
Performance Management ◽  
Control Systems ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Content Type ◽  
And Performance

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to respond to recent calls for understanding how multiple management control (MC) and performance measurement (PM) systems are used simultaneously for managing performance, particularly in the context of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Design/methodology/approach Data are collected during an in-depth case study of MC and PM and management practices in a Dutch SME using multiple data sources and elicitation methods, including interviews and participant observations. Findings This study identifies managerial practices that enable the interplay of the four control systems – beliefs, boundaries, diagnostic and interactive – helping the organization manage organizational tensions in relation to short- and long-term focus, predictable goal achievement and search for new opportunities, internal and external focus, and control and creativity. Research limitations/implications This paper advances the research on integrating multiple aspects of performance management, particularly technical and social. This research is based on a single case study; future qualitative and quantitative studies could explore the interplay between the four control systems in other settings and explore the relationship between control systems and leadership style. Practical implications Managing performance requires active and continuous use of all four control systems. This is particularly salient in SMEs where less formal controls play a key role and where balance needs to be ensured despite the lack of managerial processes and capabilities. Originality/value The findings advance PM and management theory and practice in the context of SMEs.

scholarly journals Levers Of Control: Analysis Of Management Control Systems In A Slovenian Company

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Metka Tekavčič ◽  
Darja Peljhan ◽  
Zeljko Šević
Keyword(s):  
Control Systems ◽  
Limited Range ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Control Analysis ◽  
Interactive Control ◽  
Control Framework ◽  
A Company ◽  
Levers Of Control

In the paper, we study management control from the Simons’ four levers of control framework point of view (i.e. diagnostic control systems, interactive control systems, beliefs systems, and boundary systems). The theoretical framework is tested by the use of an in-depth case study. We investigate how are MCS deployed by a case company according to Simons’ four levers of control and how does a company use them. The paper looks at tensions and balances between different styles of use of formal MCS, as well as between different types of control systems (e.g. formal vs. informal). The study’s contribution is that it incorporates a wider range of controls, including informal (i.e. social) mechanisms, to provide a more comprehensive analysis, as opposed to the majority of prior studies focusing on a more limited range of controls.

Paradoxical tensions of the COVID-19 pandemic: a paradox theory perspective on the role of management control systems in helping organizations survive crises

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Kober ◽  
Paul J. Thambar
Keyword(s):  
Control Systems ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Management Control Systems ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Strategic Objectives ◽  
Paradox Theory ◽  
Practical Implications

PurposeThis paper presents paradox theory as a useful theoretical lens for researchers exploring crises such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The authors argue that paradox theory, which emphasizes a “both/and” as opposed to an “either/or” approach, is ideally suited for management control systems (MCS) research on crises.Design/methodology/approachThe authors adopt a revelatory case approach to provide empirical examples of the insights that paradox theory can provide.FindingsThis paper highlights how MCS can be used to simultaneously manage short-term/operational and long-term/strategic objectives to navigate a crisis. Furthermore, it highlights how MCS can be mobilized during crises to identify and embrace opportunities.Practical implicationsThis paper illustrates the importance of MCS focusing on not just the short-term, but also the long-term, and managing multiple objectives in assisting organizations to survive crisis.Originality/valueThis paper highlights the benefits of using paradox theory to understand the role of MCS in helping organizations manage crises and to use a crisis as a source of opportunity.

In the field of tension between creativity and efficiency: a systematic literature review of management control systems for innovation activities

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Lill ◽  
Andreas Wald ◽  
Jan Christoph Munck
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Control Systems ◽  
Systems Design ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Management Control Systems ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Innovation Activities ◽  
Body Of Knowledge ◽  
Control Systems Design

PurposeThe number of theoretical and empirical research on management control of innovation activities has significantly increased. Existing studies in this field are characterized by a wide dispersion and a multitude of different definitions. The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic review of the literature on management control of innovation activities and to synthesize the current body of knowledge.Design/methodology/approachFollowing a systematic review approach, this article reviews 79 articles on management control for innovation activities from 1959 to 2019 and inductively derives a multi-dimensional framework.FindingsThe review of existing studies advances the debate about the detrimental versus beneficial character of management control systems for innovation, showing that the repressing character of control is not inherent to control itself, but emanates from the design of the respective management control system.Research limitations/implicationsThe multi-dimensional framework connects and combines existing research and thus synthesizes the current state of knowledge in this field. Additionally, the framework can guide practitioners to systematically assess context factors and consequences of their management control systems design, and it shows avenues for future research.Originality/valueThe scientific and practical value of this paper is the convergence of the current body of knowledge consisting of various definitions and conceptualizations and the identification of avenues for future research.

Implementing CSR activities through management control systems

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 531-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lamia Laguir ◽  
Issam Laguir ◽  
Emmanuel Tchemeni
Keyword(s):  
Control Systems ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Management Control Systems ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Global Standards ◽  
Strategic Csr ◽  
Multiple Case ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Cross Case Analysis

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to take into account Simons’ (1994) formal levers of control framework and more informal processes to examine how organizations implement and manage corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities through management control systems (MCSs). Design/methodology/approach A multiple-case study was conducted in ten large French organizations. Qualitative data were collected during in-depth semi-structured interviews with the managers who were best informed on CSR practices and MCSs. The authors then performed within-case and cross-case analysis. Findings The study shows that organizations use different MCSs to manage CSR activities directed toward their salient stakeholders – that is, employees, customers, suppliers and community. Specifically, the authors found that social MCSs are used to communicate CSR values, manage risk, evaluate CSR activities, and identify opportunities and threats. In addition, the use of MCSs to implement CSR activities is mainly driven by the need to satisfy salient stakeholder demands, manage legitimacy and reputation issues, and meet top management expectations and enhance their commitment. Last, the use of social MCSs is hindered by a lack of clear strategic CSR objectives and action plans, a lack of global standards and measurement processes for CSR, and a lack of time and financial resources. Originality/value The study addresses recent calls in the literature for research into the ways formal and informal control systems are used to implement CSR activities and provides insight that may stimulate further research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document