Chapter 10 Performance Measurement in Health Care: The Case of Best/Worst Performers Through Administrative Data

Author(s):  
Afsaneh Roshanghalb ◽  
Cristina Mazzali ◽  
Emanuele Lettieri ◽  
Anna Maria Paganoni
2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. S31
Author(s):  
James Bowen ◽  
Aleksandra Stanimirovic ◽  
Olivera Sutakovic ◽  
Conrad Pow ◽  
Debbie Sissmore ◽  
...  

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 1438
Author(s):  
Suman Budhwani ◽  
Ashlinder Gill ◽  
Mary Scott ◽  
Walter P. Wodchis ◽  
JinHee Kim ◽  
...  

Background: A plethora of performance measurement indicators for palliative and end-of-life care currently exist in the literature. This often leads to confusion, inconsistency and redundancy in efforts by health systems to understand what should be measured and how.  The objective of this study was to conduct a scoping review to provide an inventory of performance measurement indicators that can be measured using population-level health administrative data, and to summarize key concepts for measurement proposed in the literature.  Methods: A scoping review using MEDLINE and EMBASE, as well as grey literature was conducted.  Articles were included if they described performance or quality indicators of palliative and end-of-life care at the population-level using routinely-collected administrative data.  Details on the indicator such as name, description, numerator, and denominator were charted. Results: A total of 339 indicators were extracted.  These indicators were classified into nine health care sectors and one cross-sector category.  Extracted indicators emphasized key measurement themes such as health utilization and cost and excessive, unnecessary, and aggressive care particularly close to the end-of-life.  Many indicators were often measured using the same constructs, but with different specifications, such as varying time periods used to ascribe for end-of-life care, and varying patient populations.  Conclusions: Future work is needed to achieve consensus ‘best’ definitions of these indicators as well as a universal performance measurement framework, similar to other ongoing efforts in population health.  Efforts to monitor palliative and end-of-life care can use this inventory of indicators to select appropriate indicators to measure health system performance.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonali P. Desai ◽  
Allen Kachalia

Attention to the quality of care within the United States health care system has grown tremendously over the past decade. We have witnessed a significant change in how quality improvement and clinical performance measurement are approached. The current focus on quality and safety stems in part from the increasingly clear realization that more services and technological advancement are not automatically equivalent to high-quality care. Much of the discussion about cost and quality in health care is shifting towards the concept of value. Value is defined as health outcomes achieved per dollar spent (in other words, an assessment of the quality of care per cost). This chapter reviews the current state of quality improvement in health care and, because improvement cannot be determined without measurement, reviews several aspects of effective clinical performance measurement. Since many measures are already in place, the chapter describes some of the organizations involved in quality measurement and improvement, as well the approaches they utilize. It looks at the multiple strategies in place to improve quality, from process management to collaboration, from financial incentives to transparency, and reviews newer models of care delivery that may materialize in the near future. Tables list types of quality measures, characteristics to consider when developing a quality measure, and organizations involved in quality improvement and performance measurement. A figure shows strategies used by the federal government to spur performance measurement and quality improvement. This review contains 1 figure, 3 tables, and 56 references Keywords: Quality of care, performance measure, quality improvement, clinical practice, sigma six, transparency


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonali P. Desai ◽  
Allen Kachalia

Attention to the quality of care within the United States health care system has grown tremendously over the past decade. We have witnessed a significant change in how quality improvement and clinical performance measurement are approached. The current focus on quality and safety stems in part from the increasingly clear realization that more services and technological advancement are not automatically equivalent to high-quality care. Much of the discussion about cost and quality in health care is shifting towards the concept of value. Value is defined as health outcomes achieved per dollar spent (in other words, an assessment of the quality of care per cost). This chapter reviews the current state of quality improvement in health care and, because improvement cannot be determined without measurement, reviews several aspects of effective clinical performance measurement. Since many measures are already in place, the chapter describes some of the organizations involved in quality measurement and improvement, as well the approaches they utilize. It looks at the multiple strategies in place to improve quality, from process management to collaboration, from financial incentives to transparency, and reviews newer models of care delivery that may materialize in the near future. Tables list types of quality measures, characteristics to consider when developing a quality measure, and organizations involved in quality improvement and performance measurement. A figure shows strategies used by the federal government to spur performance measurement and quality improvement. This chapter contains 56 references.


2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. S31
Author(s):  
Olivera Sutakovic ◽  
James Bowen ◽  
Conrad Pow ◽  
Aleksandra Stanimirovic ◽  
Jennifer Rayner ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonali P. Desai ◽  
Allen Kachalia

Attention to the quality of care within the United States health care system has grown tremendously over the past decade. We have witnessed a significant change in how quality improvement and clinical performance measurement are approached. The current focus on quality and safety stems in part from the increasingly clear realization that more services and technological advancement are not automatically equivalent to high-quality care. Much of the discussion about cost and quality in health care is shifting towards the concept of value. Value is defined as health outcomes achieved per dollar spent (in other words, an assessment of the quality of care per cost). This chapter reviews the current state of quality improvement in health care and, because improvement cannot be determined without measurement, reviews several aspects of effective clinical performance measurement. Since many measures are already in place, the chapter describes some of the organizations involved in quality measurement and improvement, as well the approaches they utilize. It looks at the multiple strategies in place to improve quality, from process management to collaboration, from financial incentives to transparency, and reviews newer models of care delivery that may materialize in the near future. Tables list types of quality measures, characteristics to consider when developing a quality measure, and organizations involved in quality improvement and performance measurement. A figure shows strategies used by the federal government to spur performance measurement and quality improvement. This chapter contains 56 references.


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amani Mallat ◽  
Demetris Vrontis ◽  
Alkis Thrassou

Purpose This study aims to provide insights into the public–private partnerships (PPP) concept and its performance measurement in the health-care sector, identifying and refining critical success factors, including the perceived quality of health care, as evidenced by patient satisfaction and policy requirements for successful PPP implementation. Design/methodology/approach This theoretical study explores the existing literature on the relationship between service quality and patient satisfaction, to propose a culture-specific conceptual model interlinking the drivers of patient satisfaction with PPP. The in-depth theoretical research focuses on the qualitative performance indicators of PPPs, as well as their corresponding peripheral factors. Findings The research presents theoretical evidence that the concept of patient satisfaction can only be viewed through a multifactor perspective that incorporates demographics of patients, perceived service quality factors and emotions. It is found that significant improvements in service quality and patient satisfaction do, indeed, emphasize the effective role of PPP in hospitals. Practical implications The theoretical model is based on a comprehensive set of both cognitive and affective determinants. And considering these, as well as their causes, effects and interrelations, sets the foundations for testing and for further research to develop. Moreover, the outcomes of this study can be used as a theoretical base for the development of a PPP qualitative performance measurement framework. Originality/value This study attempts to fill the gap in knowledge on service quality and patient satisfaction as qualitative indicators for hospital performance after and toward PPP, while setting explicit factors and opening clear research avenues for further studies to follow.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document