scholarly journals Collaborative Learning and Learner Autonomy: Beliefs, Practices and Prospects in Pakistani Engineering Universities

IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 71493-71499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Musarat Yasmin ◽  
Farhat Naseem
Relay Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 360-381
Author(s):  
Gordon Myskow ◽  
Phillip A. Bennett ◽  
Hisako Yoshimura ◽  
Kyoko Gruendel ◽  
Takuto Marutani ◽  
...  

The distinction between Cooperative and Collaborative Learning approaches is not a clear one. Some use the terms interchangeably while others consider Cooperative Learning to be a type of Collaborative Learning. Still others clearly differentiate between them, characterizing Cooperative Learning as more highly structured in its procedures, involving a great deal of intervention by the teacher to plan and orchestrate group interactions. Collaborative Learning, on the other hand, presupposes some degree of learner autonomy-that groups can work effectively toward shared goals and monitor their own progress. This paper takes the view that the distinction between Cooperative and Collaborative Learning is a useful one and that both approaches can play valuable roles in fostering autonomous interaction. It argues that while Collaborative Learning formations may be the ultimate goal for teachers wishing to develop learner autonomy, Cooperative Learning is a valuable means for modeling the skills and abilities to help students get there. The discussion begins with an overview of the two approaches, focusing on their implementation in the Japanese educational context. It then presents seven highly structured Cooperative Learning activities and shows how they can be modified and extended over time to encourage more autonomous interaction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-95
Author(s):  
Takad Ahmed Chowdhury

Both cooperative and collaborative learning are learner-centered teaching approaches in English Language Teaching (ELT) to support active learning, shared learning, inductive learning, and autonomous learning. However, definitional and conceptual clarity of these two concepts did not receive as much attention as they deserve. As a result, these two terms are often confused, conflated or used interchangeably. This review paper critiqued the two terms by revealing their components, identifying their commonalities as well as variances, and explicating their theoretical bases and exploring their role in fostering learner autonomy. Searching and reviewing published literature were used to achieve the objectives of the study. The study perceived that cooperative learning is the educational technique that uses small groups of students guided by the teacher to benefit their individual and each other’s learning whereas collaborative learning is a philosophy of interaction of a learning group where people take responsibility for their own learning while recognizing their peers’ abilities and contributions. Both the approaches foster autonomous learning behavior where cooperative learning is considered the foundation stage for collaborative learning. This article will benefit current and future ELT practitioners and researchers of this emerging field of pedagogy by providing a clearer analyses of the terms and role in fostering learner autonomy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Simon Cooke

Traditionally, grammar classes have tended to follow a teacher-led, prescriptive curriculum with students given little opportunity to demonstrate understanding, or lack of it, on a given topic before being asked to tackle the next grammar point in a textbook. The university class under study made such an approach even more challenging by being open to students from a variety of year groups and language learning backgrounds. With a view to establishing a class which could allow students of all levels to examine the weaknesses in their grammar and share learning patterns, the curriculum was adjusted to allow for the variety of levels and encourage autonomous learning of grammar. The resulting classes made for a dynamic and collaborative learning environment which allowed students the freedom to examine and share a variety of learning styles of grammar points relevant to their English levels. 伝統的に文法の授業は教師に主導される規範的なカリキュラムに従う傾向がある。残念なことに、この方法では教科書の次の文法項目へと進む前に、現在の文法項目に対しての理解度を学生が示す機会がほとんどない。大学で様々な学年や学力の学生で構成されたクラスを教える場合、文法項目の理解度の差がより一層顕著になる。本論では、様々な学力の学生全員が、自身の文法の苦手分野を見つけ、新たな学習方法を互いに共有することができるようなクラスづくりを目指した。様々な学力に対応し、自律的な文法学習を促進するようにカリキュラムを調整した。このような形式のクラスは、学生に各自の文法の弱点を見つけ、様々な学習スタイルを共有する自由を与え、さらに活動的で、協働的な学習環境を形成する。


Author(s):  
Afsaneh Ghanizadeh ◽  
Mohammad Ghazanfari ◽  
Mohsen Fatehi

It is of paramount importance for a teacher to do his best and make sure the students are becoming quite a learner, this paper tries to analyze autonomous teacher meanings, features, learner autonomy and how to accelerate the second language acquisition. And it also endeavors to shed some light on developing language teachers’ potentials, understanding and valuing their endowments and sharing them among colleagues. It is discussed that cooperative development can be achieved through collaborative learning and peer observation. Indoctrinating and observing are also needed to fortify professional growth.


2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn S. Potts ◽  
Sarah M. Ginsberg

Abstract In recent years, colleges and universities across the country have been called upon to increase the quality of education provided and to improve student retention rates. In response to this challenge, many faculty are exploring alternatives to the traditional “lecture-centered” approach of higher education in an attempt to increase student learning and satisfaction. Collaborative learning is one method of teaching, which has been demonstrated to improve student learning outcomes.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Kowollik ◽  
Eric A. Day ◽  
Jazmine Espejo ◽  
Lauren E. McEntire ◽  
Paul R. Boatman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document