Efficacy of robotic-assisted gait training compared with intensive task-oriented physiotherapy for children with Cerebral Palsy

Author(s):  
M. Romei ◽  
A. Montinaro ◽  
L. Piccinini ◽  
C. Maghini ◽  
C. Germiniasi ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 358-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Drużbicki ◽  
W Rusek ◽  
S Snela ◽  
J Dudek ◽  
M Szczepanik ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. S9-S10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Patritti ◽  
Fernanda Romaguera ◽  
Lynn Deming ◽  
Anat Mirelman ◽  
Marlena Pelliccio ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (12) ◽  
pp. 1938-1954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noelle G. Moreau ◽  
Amy Winter Bodkin ◽  
Kristie Bjornson ◽  
Amy Hobbs ◽  
Mallary Soileau ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundChildren with cerebral palsy (CP) have decreased gait speeds, which can negatively affect their community participation and quality of life. However, evidence for effective rehabilitation interventions to improve gait speed remains unclear.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of interventions for improving gait speed in ambulatory children with CP.Data SourcesMEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, and PEDro were searched from inception through April 2014.Study SelectionThe selected studies were randomized controlled trials or had experimental designs with a comparison group, included a physical therapy or rehabilitation intervention for children with CP, and reported gait speed as an outcome measure.Data ExtractionMethodological quality was assessed by PEDro scores. Means, standard deviations, and change scores for gait speed were extracted. General study information and dosing parameters (frequency, duration, intensity, and volume) of the intervention were recorded.Data SynthesisTwenty-four studies were included. Three categories of interventions were identified: gait training (n=8), resistance training (n=9), and miscellaneous (n=7). Meta-analysis showed that gait training was effective in increasing gait speed, with a standardized effect size of 0.92 (95% confidence interval=0.19, 1.66; P=.01), whereas resistance training was shown to have a negligible effect (effect size=0.06; 95% confidence interval=−0.12, 0.25; P=.51). Effect sizes from negative to large were reported for studies in the miscellaneous category.LimitationsGait speed was the only outcome measure analyzed.ConclusionsGait training was the most effective intervention in improving gait speed for ambulatory children with CP. Strength training, even if properly dosed, was not shown to be effective in improving gait speed. Velocity training, electromyographic biofeedback training, and whole-body vibration were effective in improving gait speed in individual studies and warrant further investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document