Radar and Camera Fusion based Moving Obstacle Tracking for Automated Vehicles

Author(s):  
Shihao Wang ◽  
Zheng Ma ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Chao Yang ◽  
Weida Wang ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Huckleberry Febbo ◽  
Paramsothy Jayakumar ◽  
Jeffrey L. Stein ◽  
Tulga Ersal

Abstract Safe trajectory planning for high-performance automated vehicles in an environment with both static and moving obstacles is a challenging problem. Part of the challenge is developing a formulation that can be solved in real-time while including the following set of specifications: minimum time-to-goal, a dynamic vehicle model, minimum control effort, both static and moving obstacle avoidance, simultaneous optimization of speed and steering, and a short execution horizon. This paper presents a nonlinear model predictive control-based trajectory planning formulation, tailored for a large, high-speed unmanned ground vehicle, that includes the above set of specifications. The ability to solve this formulation in real-time is evaluated using NLOptControl, an open-source, direct-collocation based, optimal control problem solver in conjunction with the KNITRO nonlinear programming problem solver. The formulation is tested with various sets of the specifications. A parametric study relating execution horizon and obstacle speed indicates that the moving obstacle avoidance specification is not needed for safety when the planner has a small execution horizon and the obstacles are moving slowly. However, a moving obstacle avoidance specification is needed when the obstacles are moving faster, and this specification improves the overall safety without, in most cases, increasing the solve-times. The results indicate that (i) safe trajectory planners for high-performance automated vehicles should include the entire set of specifications mentioned above, unless a static or low-speed environment permits a less comprehensive planner; and (ii) the resulting formulation can be solved in real-time.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Liljamo ◽  
Heikki Liimatainen ◽  
Markus Pöllänen
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 361-411
Author(s):  
Jewoo Lee ◽  
Soon-Koo MYOUNG

Author(s):  
Bryant Walker Smith

This chapter highlights key ethical issues in the use of artificial intelligence in transport by using automated driving as an example. These issues include the tension between technological solutions and policy solutions; the consequences of safety expectations; the complex choice between human authority and computer authority; and power dynamics among individuals, governments, and companies. In 2017 and 2018, the U.S. Congress considered automated driving legislation that was generally supported by many of the larger automated-driving developers. However, this automated-driving legislation failed to pass because of a lack of trust in technologies and institutions. Trustworthiness is much more of an ethical question. Automated vehicles will not be driven by individuals or even by computers; they will be driven by companies acting through their human and machine agents. An essential issue for this field—and for artificial intelligence generally—is how the companies that develop and deploy these technologies should earn people’s trust.


2021 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 103166
Author(s):  
Wissam Kontar ◽  
Tienan Li ◽  
Anupam Srivastava ◽  
Yang Zhou ◽  
Danjue Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document