Sensory Feedback in Upper Limb Amputees Impacts Cortical Activity as Revealed by Multiscale Connectivity Analysis

Author(s):  
Rohit Bose ◽  
Keqin Ding ◽  
Manuel Seet ◽  
Luke Osborn ◽  
Anastasios Bezerianos ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 303-306 ◽  
pp. 261-265
Author(s):  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Qi Xu ◽  
Ji Ping He

An emerging challenge in developing intelligent prostheses is to replicate or recreate the sensory functions of natural limbs for amputees. Such functions mainly include tactile sensation and proprioception. This paper reviews the tactile receptors and proprioceptors in human upper limb, the artificial sensors in upper limb prosthesis, and the sensory feedback technology used for reconstruction of lost sensory function in the amputee’s upper limb.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 439-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Svensson ◽  
Ulrika Wijk ◽  
Anders Björkman ◽  
Christian Antfolk

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 2546-2556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Hoffmann ◽  
Brian D. Schmit ◽  
Jennifer H. Kahn ◽  
Derek G. Kamper

This study investigated the potential influence of proximal sensory feedback on voluntary distal motor activity in the paretic upper limb of hemiparetic stroke survivors and the potential effect of voluntary distal motor activity on proximal muscle activity. Ten stroke subjects and 10 neurologically intact control subjects performed maximum voluntary isometric flexion and extension, respectively, at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of the fingers in two static arm postures and under three conditions of electrical stimulation of the arm. The tasks were quantified in terms of maximum MCP torque [MCP flexion (MCPflex) or MCP extension (MCPext)] and activity of targeted (flexor digitorum superficialis or extensor digitorum communis) and nontargeted upper limb muscles. From a previous study on the MCP stretch reflex poststroke, we expected stroke subjects to exhibit a modulation of voluntary MCP torque production by arm posture and electrical stimulation and increased nontargeted muscle activity. Posture 1 (flexed elbow, neutral shoulder) led to greater MCPflexin stroke subjects than posture 2 (extended elbow, flexed shoulder). Electrical stimulation did not influence MCPflexor MCPextin either subject group. In stroke subjects, posture 1 led to greater nontargeted upper limb flexor activity during MCPflexand to greater elbow flexor and extensor activity during MCPext. Stroke subjects exhibited greater elbow flexor activity during MCPflexand greater elbow flexor and extensor activity during MCPextthan control subjects. The results suggest that static arm posture can modulate voluntary distal motor activity and accompanying muscle activity in the paretic upper limb poststroke.


2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Antfolk ◽  
Marco D’Alonzo ◽  
Birgitta Rosén ◽  
Göran Lundborg ◽  
Fredrik Sebelius ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 1077-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Favre ◽  
Thomas A. Zeffiro ◽  
Olivier Detante ◽  
Alexandre Krainik ◽  
Marc Hommel ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 1828-1848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Omrani ◽  
Matthew T. Kaufman ◽  
Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos ◽  
Paul D. Cheney

Primary motor cortex has been studied for more than a century, yet a consensus on its functional contribution to movement control is still out of reach. In particular, there remains controversy as to the level of control produced by motor cortex (“low-level” movement dynamics vs. “high-level” movement kinematics) and the role of sensory feedback. In this review, we present different perspectives on the two following questions: What does activity in motor cortex reflect? and How do planned motor commands interact with incoming sensory feedback during movement? The four authors each present their independent views on how they think the primary motor cortex (M1) controls movement. At the end, we present a dialogue in which the authors synthesize their views and suggest possibilities for moving the field forward. While there is not yet a consensus on the role of M1 or sensory feedback in the control of upper limb movements, such dialogues are essential to take us closer to one.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document