scholarly journals Clustering Method of 3D Point Cloud of Muck-Pile Based on Connectivity of Adjacent Surface

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidehiko Shishido ◽  
Zha Wanzhi ◽  
Hyongdoo Jang ◽  
Youhei Kawamura ◽  
Yoshinari Kameda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Point Cloud ◽  
3D Point Cloud ◽  
Clustering Method

scholarly journals Unsupervised Clustering of Multi-Perspective 3D Point Cloud Data in Marshes: A Case Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
pp. 2715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuyen Nguyen ◽  
Michael J. Starek ◽  
Philippe Tissot ◽  
James Gibeaut
Keyword(s):  
Land Cover ◽  
Point Cloud ◽  
Point Clouds ◽  
Unsupervised Clustering ◽  
Unmanned Aircraft ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
3D Point Cloud ◽  
Point Cloud Data ◽  
Clustering Method ◽  
Cloud Data

Dense three-dimensional (3D) point cloud data sets generated by Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) and Unmanned Aircraft System based Structure-from-Motion (UAS-SfM) photogrammetry have different characteristics and provide different representations of the underlying land cover. While there are differences, a common challenge associated with these technologies is how to best take advantage of these large data sets, often several hundred million points, to efficiently extract relevant information. Given their size and complexity, the data sets cannot be efficiently and consistently separated into homogeneous features without the use of automated segmentation algorithms. This research aims to evaluate the performance and generalizability of an unsupervised clustering method, originally developed for segmentation of TLS point cloud data in marshes, by extending it to UAS-SfM point clouds. The combination of two sets of features are extracted from both datasets: “core” features that can be extracted from any 3D point cloud and “sensor specific” features unique to the imaging modality. Comparisons of segmented results based on producer’s and user’s accuracies allow for identifying the advantages and limitations of each dataset and determining the generalization of the clustering method. The producer’s accuracies suggest that UAS-SfM (94.7%) better represents tidal flats, while TLS (99.5%) is slightly more suitable for vegetated areas. The users’ accuracies suggest that UAS-SfM outperforms TLS in vegetated areas with 98.6% of those points identified as vegetation actually falling in vegetated areas whereas TLS outperforms UAS-SfM in tidal flat areas with 99.2% user accuracy. Results demonstrate that the clustering method initially developed for TLS point cloud data transfers well to UAS-SfM point cloud data to enable consistent and accurate segmentation of marsh land cover via an unsupervised method.

scholarly journals Label3DMaize: toolkit for 3D point cloud data annotation of maize shoots

GigaScience ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teng Miao ◽  
Weiliang Wen ◽  
Yinglun Li ◽  
Sheng Wu ◽  
Chao Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Point Cloud ◽  
Training Dataset ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
3D Point Cloud ◽  
Plant Structure ◽  
Data Annotation ◽  
Cloud Data ◽  
Point Cloud Segmentation ◽  
Different Growth Stages

Abstract Background The 3D point cloud is the most direct and effective data form for studying plant structure and morphology. In point cloud studies, the point cloud segmentation of individual plants to organs directly determines the accuracy of organ-level phenotype estimation and the reliability of the 3D plant reconstruction. However, highly accurate, automatic, and robust point cloud segmentation approaches for plants are unavailable. Thus, the high-throughput segmentation of many shoots is challenging. Although deep learning can feasibly solve this issue, software tools for 3D point cloud annotation to construct the training dataset are lacking. Results We propose a top-to-down point cloud segmentation algorithm using optimal transportation distance for maize shoots. We apply our point cloud annotation toolkit for maize shoots, Label3DMaize, to achieve semi-automatic point cloud segmentation and annotation of maize shoots at different growth stages, through a series of operations, including stem segmentation, coarse segmentation, fine segmentation, and sample-based segmentation. The toolkit takes ∼4–10 minutes to segment a maize shoot and consumes 10–20% of the total time if only coarse segmentation is required. Fine segmentation is more detailed than coarse segmentation, especially at the organ connection regions. The accuracy of coarse segmentation can reach 97.2% that of fine segmentation. Conclusion Label3DMaize integrates point cloud segmentation algorithms and manual interactive operations, realizing semi-automatic point cloud segmentation of maize shoots at different growth stages. The toolkit provides a practical data annotation tool for further online segmentation research based on deep learning and is expected to promote automatic point cloud processing of various plants.

scholarly journals UAV Based Estimation of Forest Leaf Area Index (LAI) through Oblique Photogrammetry

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 803
Author(s):  
Lingchen Lin ◽  
Kunyong Yu ◽  
Xiong Yao ◽  
Yangbo Deng ◽  
Zhenbang Hao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Point Cloud ◽  
Forest Canopy ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Vertical Direction ◽  
Estimation Accuracy ◽  
3D Point Cloud ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Better Than

As a key canopy structure parameter, the estimation method of the Leaf Area Index (LAI) has always attracted attention. To explore a potential method to estimate forest LAI from 3D point cloud at low cost, we took photos from different angles of the drone and set five schemes (O (0°), T15 (15°), T30 (30°), OT15 (0° and 15°) and OT30 (0° and 30°)), which were used to reconstruct 3D point cloud of forest canopy based on photogrammetry. Subsequently, the LAI values and the leaf area distribution in the vertical direction derived from five schemes were calculated based on the voxelized model. Our results show that the serious lack of leaf area in the middle and lower layers determines that the LAI estimate of O is inaccurate. For oblique photogrammetry, schemes with 30° photos always provided better LAI estimates than schemes with 15° photos (T30 better than T15, OT30 better than OT15), mainly reflected in the lower part of the canopy, which is particularly obvious in low-LAI areas. The overall structure of the single-tilt angle scheme (T15, T30) was relatively complete, but the rough point cloud details could not reflect the actual situation of LAI well. Multi-angle schemes (OT15, OT30) provided excellent leaf area estimation (OT15: R2 = 0.8225, RMSE = 0.3334 m2/m2; OT30: R2 = 0.9119, RMSE = 0.1790 m2/m2). OT30 provided the best LAI estimation accuracy at a sub-voxel size of 0.09 m and the best checkpoint accuracy (OT30: RMSE [H] = 0.2917 m, RMSE [V] = 0.1797 m). The results highlight that coupling oblique photography and nadiral photography can be an effective solution to estimate forest LAI.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Distance Impact to the Scanning Topographic Object with the 3D Point Cloud Resolution

2021 ◽  
Vol 767 (1) ◽  
pp. 012030
Author(s):  
Rosmadi Ghazali ◽  
Mohamad Hezri Razali ◽  
Muhammad Nasri Abdul Ghani ◽  
Abdul Rauf Abdul Rasam
Keyword(s):  
Point Cloud ◽  
3D Point Cloud
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document