scholarly journals Improved Weighted Instrumental Variable Estimator for Doppler-Bearing Source Localization in Heavy Noise

Author(s):  
Ngoc Hung Nguyen ◽  
Kutluyil Dogancay
2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 873-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiko Hayakawa

In this paper, we show that for panel AR(p) models, an instrumental variable (IV) estimator with instruments deviated from past means has the same asymptotic distribution as the infeasible optimal IV estimator when bothNandT, the dimensions of the cross section and time series, are large. If we assume that the errors are normally distributed, the asymptotic variance of the proposed IV estimator is shown to attain the lower bound when bothNandTare large. A simulation study is conducted to assess the estimator.


2021 ◽  
pp. 19-25
Author(s):  
Mitch Kunce

Abstract The appealing but complex Hausman and Taylor (1981) random effects (instrumental variable) estimator requires prior knowledge that certain explanatory variables in a panel are uncorrelated with the latent group effects. The purpose of this examination is to outline a tractable variable pretest that facilitates the initial sorting of regressors as likely exogenous or endogenous. The variable pretest proposed herein builds on the pretest estimator suggested by Baltagi et al (2003) by providing the necessary foundation for regressor identification. Extensions are suggested for the two-way error components construct. Keywords: Panel data, Random effects, Variable pretest, Hausman-Taylor. JEL Classification: C12, C13, C23.


2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 111-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P Murray

Archimedes said, “Give me the place to stand, and a lever long enough, and I will move the Earth.” Economists have their own powerful lever: the instrumental variable estimator. The instrumental variable estimator can avoid the bias that ordinary least squares suffers when an explanatory variable in a regression is correlated with the regression's disturbance term. But, like Archimedes' lever, instrumental variable estimation requires both a valid instrument on which to stand and an instrument that isn't too short (or “too weak”). This paper briefly reviews instrumental variable estimation, discusses classic strategies for avoiding invalid instruments (instruments themselves correlated with the regression's disturbances), and describes recently developed strategies for coping with weak instruments (instruments only weakly correlated with the offending explanator).


De Economist ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 168 (4) ◽  
pp. 475-517
Author(s):  
Tanja Fendel

Abstract This study estimates the wage elasticities of migrants and natives by using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel from 1984 to 2015 and a grouping instrumental variable estimator. Female migrants who live with a partner have lower own- and cross-wage elasticities than respective female natives, and the elasticities of non-Western female migrants are insignificant. The relationship between participation and elasticity is not in all cases positive, but parallel to labour market integration, the time since migration increases the elasticities of women. Elasticities indicate the potential to increase participation; therefore, it is especially important for non-Western female migrants to remove barriers to flexible wage responses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document