CertificateLess Cryptography-Based Rule Management Protocol for Advanced Mission Delivery Networks

Author(s):  
Jongho Won ◽  
Ankush Singla ◽  
Elisa Bertino
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Chinelo Okigbo ◽  
Fatima Mohiuddin ◽  
Jesus Vargas ◽  
Edward Hamaty

VASA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 381-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Uhl ◽  
Thomas Betz ◽  
Andrea Rupp ◽  
Markus Steinbauer ◽  
Ingolf Töpel

Abstract. Summary: Background: This pilot study was set up to examine the effects of a continuous postoperative wound infusion system with a local anaesthetic on perioperative pain and the consumption of analgesics. Patients and methods: We included 42 patients in this prospective observational pilot study. Patients were divided into two groups. One group was treated in accordance with the WHO standard pain management protocol and in addition to that received a continuous local wound infusion treatment (Group 1). Group 2 was treated with analgesics in accordance with the WHO standard pain management protocol, exclusively. Results: The study demonstrated a significantly reduced postoperative VAS score for stump pain in Group 1 for the first 5 days. Furthermore, the intake of opiates was significantly reduced in Group 1 (day 1, Group 1: 42.1 vs. Group 2: 73.5, p = 0.010; day 2, Group 1: 27.7 vs. Group 2: 52.5, p = 0.012; day 3, Group 1: 23.9 vs. Group 2: 53.5, p = 0.002; day 4, Group 1: 15.7 vs. Group 2: 48.3, p = 0.003; day 5, Group 1 13.3 vs. Group 2: 49.9, p = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups, neither in phantom pain intensity at discharge nor postoperative complications and death. Conclusions: Continuous postoperative wound infusion with a local anaesthetic in combination with a standard pain management protocol can reduce both stump pain and opiate intake in patients who have undergone transfemoral amputation. Phantom pain was not significantly affected.


2015 ◽  
Vol E98.B (7) ◽  
pp. 1333-1344
Author(s):  
Raymundo BUENROSTRO-MARISCAL ◽  
Maria COSIO-LEON ◽  
Juan-Ivan NIETO-HIPOLITO ◽  
Juan-Antonio GUERRERO-IBANEZ ◽  
Mabel VAZQUEZ-BRISENO ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 224-241
Author(s):  
Amina Mohamed Abdel Fatah Sliman ◽  
Wafaa Wahdan Abd El-Aziz ◽  
Hend Elsayed Mansour

Author(s):  
Mark Newman

This chapter describes models of the growth or formation of networks, with a particular focus on preferential attachment models. It starts with a discussion of the classic preferential attachment model for citation networks introduced by Price, including a complete derivation of the degree distribution in the limit of large network size. Subsequent sections introduce the Barabasi-Albert model and various generalized preferential attachment models, including models with addition or removal of extra nodes or edges and models with nonlinear preferential attachment. Also discussed are node copying models and models in which networks are formed by optimization processes, such as delivery networks or airline networks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document