Applications of support vector machine and improved k-Nearest neighbor algorithm in fault diagnosis and fault degree evaluation of gas insulated switchgear

Author(s):  
Kai Zheng ◽  
Gangquan Si ◽  
Lijie Diao ◽  
Zhou Zhou ◽  
Jiaxi Chen ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 261
Author(s):  
Lila Dini Utami

At this time the freedom to express opinions in oral and written forms about everything is very easy. This activity can be used to make decisions by some business people. Especially by service providers, such as hotels. This will be very useful in the development of the hotel business itself. But the review data must be processed using the right algorithm. So this study was conducted to find out which algorithms are more feasible to use to get the highest accuracy. The methods used are Naïve Bayes (NB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN). From the process that has been done, the results of Naïve Bayes accuracy are 71.50% with the AUC value is 0.500, Support Vector Machine is 72.50% with the AUC value is 0.936 and the accuracy results if using the k-Nearest Neighbor algorithm is 75.00% with the AUC value is 0.500. The use of the k-Nearest Neighbor algorithm can help in making more appropriate decisions for hotel reviews at this time.


Author(s):  
Linlin Kou ◽  
Yong Qin ◽  
Xunjun Zhao ◽  
Yong Fu

Bogies are critical components of a rail vehicle, which are important for the safe operation of rail transit. In this study, the authors analyzed the real vibration data of the bogies of a railway vehicle obtained from a Chinese subway company under four different operating conditions. The authors selected 15 feature indexes – that ranged from time-domain, energy, and entropy – as well as their correlations. The adaptive synthetic sampling approach–gradient boosting decision tree (ADASYN–GBDT) method is proposed for the bogie fault diagnosis. A comparison between ADASYN–GBDT and the three commonly used classifiers (K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and Gaussian naïve Bayes), combined with random forest as the feature selection, was done under different test data sizes. A confusion matrix was used to evaluate those classifiers. In K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and Gaussian naïve Bayes, the optimal features should be selected first, while the proposed method of this study does not need to select the optimal features. K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and Gaussian naïve Bayes produced inaccurate results in multi-class identification. It can be seen that the lowest false detection rates of the proposed ADASYN–GBDT model are 92.95% and 87.81% when proportion of the test dataset is 0.4 and 0.9, respectively. In addition, the ADASYN–GBDT model has the ability to correctly identify a fault, which makes it more practical and suitable for use in railway operations. The entire process (training and testing) was finished in 2.4231 s and the detection procedure took 0.0027 s on average. The results show that the proposed ADASYN–GBDT method satisfied the requirements of real-time performance and accuracy for online fault detection. It might therefore aid in the fault detection of bogies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document