Electromyography Based Orthotic Arm and Finger Rehabilitation System

Author(s):  
Jose Gotuzzo ◽  
Sonny Vu ◽  
Sharlyn Dee ◽  
Kiran George
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-181
Author(s):  
Marcelo Bighetti Toniollo ◽  
Mikaelly dos Santos Sá ◽  
Fernanda Pereira Silva ◽  
Giselle Rodrigues Reis ◽  
Ana Paula Macedo ◽  
...  

Rehabilitation with implant prostheses in posterior areas requires the maximum number of possible implants due to the greater masticatory load of the region. However, the necessary minimum requirements are not always present in full. This project analyzed the minimum principal stresses (TMiP, representative of the compressive stress) to the friable structures, specifically the vestibular face of the cortical bone and the vestibular and internal/lingual face of the medullary bone. The experimental groups were as follows: the regular splinted group (GR), with a conventional infrastructure on 3 regular-length Morse taper implants (4 × 11 mm); and the regular pontic group (GP), with a pontic infrastructure on 2 regular-length Morse taper implants (4 × 11 mm). The results showed that the TMiP of the cortical and medullary bones were greater for the GP in regions surrounding the implants (especially in the cervical and apical areas of the same region) but they did not reach bone damage levels, at least under the loads applied in this study. It was concluded that greater stress observed in the GP demonstrates greater fragility with this modality of rehabilitation; this should draw the professional's attention to possible biomechanical implications. Whenever possible, professionals should give preference to use of a greater number of implants in the rehabilitation system, with a focus on preserving the supporting tissue with the generation of less intense stresses.


Author(s):  
David X. Cifu ◽  
Shane McNamee ◽  
David Gater ◽  
William C. Walker ◽  
Jeffery Ericksen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Zhichen Pei ◽  
Tianchen Li ◽  
Hangping Yu ◽  
Meimei Han ◽  
Joao Paulo Ferreira ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Teresa Vilar Paredes ◽  
Octavian Postolache ◽  
Joao Monge ◽  
Pedro Silva Girao

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 859-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katariina Hinkka ◽  
Mikko Niemelä ◽  
Ilona Autti-Rämö ◽  
Heikki Palomäki

Aims: The aim of this study was to explore Finnish physicians’ perceptions of sickness absence (SA) certification. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 50% of the physicians in Finland who provide care to working-age patients in a clinical practice setting. Of the 8867 physicians, 3089 responded. Physicians handling SA certification patients at least a few times per month were included ( n = 2472). Results: At least a few times per month, 61% of all physicians perceived SA issues as problematic, 60% had experienced a lack of time in dealing with SA matters, 36% had disagreed with a patient on SA certification, and 36% had met a patient who wanted a SA certificate for reasons other than a disease or injury. Physicians were least worried about patients filing complaints (4%), exhibiting threatening behaviour (2%), or switching physicians for SA certification reasons (1%). A total of 60% of physicians had prescribed SA for a longer period than necessary because of long waiting times for further care/measures. Non-specialized physicians, general practitioners, and psychiatrists experienced problems more frequently than surgeons and occupational health physicians. Over 50% of the respondents had a fairly large or very large need to deepen their knowledge of social insurance matters. The need for national guidelines for all or some diseases was reported by 80% of the respondents. Conclusions: Many physicians perceive SA tasks as problematic and are unable to dedicate enough time to them. Shortcomings in physicians’ sickness certification know-how, as well as obstacles in the healthcare and rehabilitation system, prolong the SA process. Attitudes towards the adoption of national guidelines on the duration of SA were positive.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. 35-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Tang ◽  
Gang Chen ◽  
Yan-Wen Xu ◽  
Karen Y. L. Hui-Lo ◽  
Xiao-Yuan Luo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document